Long article, great read.
Jung's Red Book to be published
Started by Ives, Sep 20 2009 06:41 PM
6 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 20 September 2009 - 06:41 PM
#2
Posted 20 September 2009 - 07:12 PM
tl;dr would be an understatement
. Longest article I've seen in a newspaper. Will read tommorow
#3
Posted 20 September 2009 - 07:12 PM
tl;dr would be an understatement
. Longest article I've seen in a newspaper. Will read tommorow
#4
Posted 20 September 2009 - 10:50 PM
Wow, this book seems really exciting!
I've only read Jung's journal so far, and, to quote this article, "deemed it both fascinating and worrisome, concluding that it was the work of a psychotic."
I've only read Jung's journal so far, and, to quote this article, "deemed it both fascinating and worrisome, concluding that it was the work of a psychotic."
#5
Posted 21 September 2009 - 07:11 AM
I don't really understand why they didn't release it before. It couldn't possibly be more psychotic than Lovecraft. Still, if the family wished it not to be read, I'm not sure it should be.
#6
Posted 21 September 2009 - 07:17 AM
10 page article... 
Will read soon...
Will read soon...
#7
Posted 22 September 2009 - 05:58 PM
Well, I mean, it's your fathers personal nightmares and psyche being put out in the open. No matter how great he is academically, it's personal shit. It's like releasing a diary. Now that the grandchildren are a bit detached from nearly half a century since his death, it's not as much as a trauma to put out a piece of work like that. I'm sure Jung woulda released it in his lifetime if he lived to be 105 though.I don't really understand why they didn't release it before. It couldn't possibly be more psychotic than Lovecraft. Still, if the family wished it not to be read, I'm not sure it should be.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users


