It does suck, it didn't used to but it does now in comparison.
Well. My point of reference was the past
What works and what is paused · Email is limited to account activation and password resets.
Posted 16 November 2009 - 09:51 AM
It does suck, it didn't used to but it does now in comparison.
Posted 16 November 2009 - 09:57 AM
Well. My point of reference was the past
.
Posted 16 November 2009 - 09:59 AM
And everybody else was referring to the present, which is quite logical really since most people don't currently live in 2001.
Posted 16 November 2009 - 11:32 AM
I know. But thats like saying Windows 98 sucks. It does now, back then people where like. OMG.
IE 6 was great during its lifetime. Just because its no longer supported, does not mean we can reach back in time and declare it to suck.
Edited by swerving2win, 16 November 2009 - 11:33 AM.
Posted 16 November 2009 - 11:40 AM
windows 98 was good for its time. You can't compare the OS with the browser. The difference is people stopped using 98 a while ago while several people still use IE 6. Both are outdated, and suck for modern day use.
Posted 16 November 2009 - 02:00 PM
Lies!. We have had 4 Windows 98 computers in this month!
Posted 16 November 2009 - 02:45 PM
are they elderly customers? My father switched from 98 to XP 2 years ago. They tend to be late bloomers when it comes to technology.
Posted 16 November 2009 - 03:47 PM
Those who don't adapt to change get left behindYeah. People dont like change
Posted 17 November 2009 - 07:10 AM
Those who don't adapt to change get left behind
.
Posted 17 November 2009 - 08:16 AM
Yeah. People dont like change
Posted 17 November 2009 - 08:51 AM
Is that why you use IE 6 still
?
Posted 17 November 2009 - 09:09 AM
Dawg, dawg. Calm yo ass down. I could say the same about j00 but that would be messed lawl.Its like you dont even read. I'm using FIREFOX.
Posted 17 November 2009 - 09:11 AM
Dawg, dawg. Calm yo ass down. I could say the same about j00 but that would be messed lawl.
Posted 17 November 2009 - 03:02 PM
Posted 17 November 2009 - 03:05 PM
No, not reallyWoah, really?
Good thing I use Opera.
Posted 17 November 2009 - 03:15 PM
No, not really
. It's a misleading statement made by a non-reputable organization who published a shoddy report.
Posted 17 November 2009 - 03:22 PM
Well... good web developers should make their site compatible with all browsers...Then it's a good thing I use FF and IE sometimes, for their plugins and compatibility with more sites?
Posted 17 November 2009 - 03:26 PM
Well... good web developers should make their site compatible with all browsers
. Most sites you go to, you shouldn't have problems
.
Posted 17 November 2009 - 03:31 PM
Well... good web developers should make their site compatible with all browsers
. Most sites you go to, you shouldn't have problems
Also, wtf is going on in your avatar?
![]()
Posted 17 November 2009 - 03:43 PM
BurnIs that why the itemdb is currently only fully working with Firefox?
Lol.
Oh, yeah. I know what you mean. Those sites use Active X controls. It's a web technology that allows for rich content in browsers, similar to Adobe's Flash. As far as I know, IE is the only browser to implement them (I think it's a Microsoft thing anyway). However, that also leaves IE users vulnerable to some evil people out there. Active X controls have some interesting security policies though. The control is allowed virtually full access to the computer which makes installing one relatively dangerous: only install Active X controls from sources you trust.Well, when I say compatibility, I mean those parts of microsoft.com and that site which tells you if you can run a game. You know, those ones which ONLY let you use IE
Cirno, from Touhou, is being eaten by a frog. Isn't it obvious?
Posted 17 November 2009 - 05:18 PM
Burn
.
I'm a shitty web developer. I prefer the logic to the display
.
Oh, yeah. I know what you mean. Those sites use Active X controls. It's a web technology that allows for rich content in browsers, similar to Adobe's Flash. As far as I know, IE is the only browser to implement them (I think it's a Microsoft thing anyway). However, that also leaves IE users vulnerable to some evil people out there. Active X controls have some interesting security policies though. The control is allowed virtually full access to the computer which makes installing one relatively dangerous: only install Active X controls from sources you trust.
Posted 17 November 2009 - 05:20 PM
That means the user is the security vulnerability, not Active X.
Posted 17 November 2009 - 05:26 PM
You should never trust users not to do stupid things though, the option just shouldn't exist in the first place.
Posted 20 November 2009 - 10:06 PM
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users