Quantcast

What works and what is paused · Email is limited to account activation and password resets.

Jump to content


Photo

Firefox and Safari are more vulnerable then IE.


  • Please log in to reply
73 replies to this topic

#51 iargue

iargue
  • 10048 posts


Users Awards

Posted 16 November 2009 - 09:51 AM

It does suck, it didn't used to but it does now in comparison.



Well. My point of reference was the past :p.

Advertisement

    #52 Waser Lave

    Waser Lave
    • 25516 posts


    Users Awards

    Posted 16 November 2009 - 09:57 AM

    Well. My point of reference was the past :p.


    And everybody else was referring to the present, which is quite logical really since most people don't currently live in 2001. :p

    #53 iargue

    iargue
    • 10048 posts


    Users Awards

    Posted 16 November 2009 - 09:59 AM

    And everybody else was referring to the present, which is quite logical really since most people don't currently live in 2001. :p


    I'm pretty sure I can find a society out there that is dedicated to living in 2001 :). I'll go and join them. (They are the sole cause of why devolopers have to work with IE6)

    #54 swerving2win

    swerving2win
    • 26 posts

    Posted 16 November 2009 - 11:32 AM

    I know. But thats like saying Windows 98 sucks. It does now, back then people where like. OMG.

    IE 6 was great during its lifetime. Just because its no longer supported, does not mean we can reach back in time and declare it to suck.


    windows 98 was good for its time. You can't compare the OS with the browser. The difference is people stopped using 98 a while ago while several people still use IE 6. Both are outdated, and suck for modern day use.

    Edited by swerving2win, 16 November 2009 - 11:33 AM.


    #55 iargue

    iargue
    • 10048 posts


    Users Awards

    Posted 16 November 2009 - 11:40 AM

    windows 98 was good for its time. You can't compare the OS with the browser. The difference is people stopped using 98 a while ago while several people still use IE 6. Both are outdated, and suck for modern day use.



    Lies!. We have had 4 Windows 98 computers in this month! :)

    #56 swerving2win

    swerving2win
    • 26 posts

    Posted 16 November 2009 - 02:00 PM

    Lies!. We have had 4 Windows 98 computers in this month! :)

    O_o
    are they elderly customers? My father switched from 98 to XP 2 years ago. They tend to be late bloomers when it comes to technology.

    #57 iargue

    iargue
    • 10048 posts


    Users Awards

    Posted 16 November 2009 - 02:45 PM

    O_o
    are they elderly customers? My father switched from 98 to XP 2 years ago. They tend to be late bloomers when it comes to technology.



    Yeah. People dont like change :p

    #58 Hydrogen

    Hydrogen
    • Neocodex Co-Founder

    • 22213 posts


    Users Awards

    Posted 16 November 2009 - 03:47 PM

    Yeah. People dont like change :p

    Those who don't adapt to change get left behind :p.

    #59 sealonfire

    sealonfire
    • 523 posts

    Posted 17 November 2009 - 07:10 AM

    Those who don't adapt to change get left behind Posted Image.



    And get lol'd by people.

    #60 swerving2win

    swerving2win
    • 26 posts

    Posted 17 November 2009 - 08:16 AM

    Yeah. People dont like change :p


    Is that why you use IE 6 still :shifty:?

    #61 iargue

    iargue
    • 10048 posts


    Users Awards

    Posted 17 November 2009 - 08:51 AM

    Is that why you use IE 6 still :shifty:?



    Its like you dont even read. I'm using FIREFOX.

    #62 Hydrogen

    Hydrogen
    • Neocodex Co-Founder

    • 22213 posts


    Users Awards

    Posted 17 November 2009 - 09:09 AM

    Its like you dont even read. I'm using FIREFOX.

    Dawg, dawg. Calm yo ass down. I could say the same about j00 but that would be messed lawl.

    #63 iargue

    iargue
    • 10048 posts


    Users Awards

    Posted 17 November 2009 - 09:11 AM

    Dawg, dawg. Calm yo ass down. I could say the same about j00 but that would be messed lawl.



    Rofl. Great talking :)

    #64 fantastality

    fantastality
    • 3 posts

    Posted 17 November 2009 - 03:02 PM

    Woah, really?

    Good thing I use Opera. :p



    #65 Hydrogen

    Hydrogen
    • Neocodex Co-Founder

    • 22213 posts


    Users Awards

    Posted 17 November 2009 - 03:05 PM

    Woah, really?

    Good thing I use Opera. :p


    No, not really :p. It's a misleading statement made by a non-reputable organization who published a shoddy report.

    #66 fantastality

    fantastality
    • 3 posts

    Posted 17 November 2009 - 03:15 PM

    No, not really :p. It's a misleading statement made by a non-reputable organization who published a shoddy report.


    ...Then it's a good thing I use FF and IE sometimes, for their plugins and compatibility with more sites?

    #67 Hydrogen

    Hydrogen
    • Neocodex Co-Founder

    • 22213 posts


    Users Awards

    Posted 17 November 2009 - 03:22 PM

    ...Then it's a good thing I use FF and IE sometimes, for their plugins and compatibility with more sites?

    Well... good web developers should make their site compatible with all browsers :p. Most sites you go to, you shouldn't have problems :p.

    Also, wtf is going on in your avatar? :p

    #68 Waser Lave

    Waser Lave
    • 25516 posts


    Users Awards

    Posted 17 November 2009 - 03:26 PM

    Well... good web developers should make their site compatible with all browsers :p. Most sites you go to, you shouldn't have problems :p.


    Is that why the itemdb is currently only fully working with Firefox? ;) Lol.

    #69 fantastality

    fantastality
    • 3 posts

    Posted 17 November 2009 - 03:31 PM

    Well... good web developers should make their site compatible with all browsers :p. Most sites you go to, you shouldn't have problems :p


    Well, when I say compatibility, I mean those parts of microsoft.com and that site which tells you if you can run a game. You know, those ones which ONLY let you use IE  <_<


    Also, wtf is going on in your avatar?   :p


    Cirno, from Touhou, is being eaten by a frog. Isn't it obvious?

    #70 Hydrogen

    Hydrogen
    • Neocodex Co-Founder

    • 22213 posts


    Users Awards

    Posted 17 November 2009 - 03:43 PM

    Is that why the itemdb is currently only fully working with Firefox? ;) Lol.

    Burn :(.

    :p

    I'm a shitty web developer :p. I prefer the logic to the display :p.

    Well, when I say compatibility, I mean those parts of microsoft.com and that site which tells you if you can run a game. You know, those ones which ONLY let you use IE <_<

    Cirno, from Touhou, is being eaten by a frog. Isn't it obvious?

    Oh, yeah. I know what you mean. Those sites use Active X controls. It's a web technology that allows for rich content in browsers, similar to Adobe's Flash. As far as I know, IE is the only browser to implement them (I think it's a Microsoft thing anyway). However, that also leaves IE users vulnerable to some evil people out there. Active X controls have some interesting security policies though. The control is allowed virtually full access to the computer which makes installing one relatively dangerous: only install Active X controls from sources you trust.

    #71 iargue

    iargue
    • 10048 posts


    Users Awards

    Posted 17 November 2009 - 05:18 PM

    Burn :(.

    :p

    I'm a shitty web developer :p. I prefer the logic to the display :p.

    Oh, yeah. I know what you mean. Those sites use Active X controls. It's a web technology that allows for rich content in browsers, similar to Adobe's Flash. As far as I know, IE is the only browser to implement them (I think it's a Microsoft thing anyway). However, that also leaves IE users vulnerable to some evil people out there. Active X controls have some interesting security policies though. The control is allowed virtually full access to the computer which makes installing one relatively dangerous: only install Active X controls from sources you trust.



    That means the user is the security vulnerability, not Active X. :p

    #72 Waser Lave

    Waser Lave
    • 25516 posts


    Users Awards

    Posted 17 November 2009 - 05:20 PM

    That means the user is the security vulnerability, not Active X. :p


    You should never trust users not to do stupid things though, the option just shouldn't exist in the first place. :p

    #73 iargue

    iargue
    • 10048 posts


    Users Awards

    Posted 17 November 2009 - 05:26 PM

    You should never trust users not to do stupid things though, the option just shouldn't exist in the first place. :p



    Its a battle between security and features. Active x is full of features, but it doesnt have any security :p. Well, besides IE saying, "If you dont know the maker, DONT FUCKING INSTALL" (Not like thats EVER changed anything).


    Windows has for years been poping up whenever you run a program saying, "This could be a virus, unless you know the publisher, dont install it" and people are still like, "Yes. I would like a virus"

    #74 Shinigami88

    Shinigami88
    • 129 posts

    Posted 20 November 2009 - 10:06 PM

    yea i agree... its basically up to the user -.-


    1 user(s) are reading this topic

    0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users