20 replies to this topic

[AjayC]

http://hosted.ap.org...EMPLATE=DEFAULT

Thoughts? I dunno, seems kinda wacko to me. But then again. It IS California.

[Ellcrys]

I don't think it would really happen. Or that it would be a very good idea. Sometimes people just need to seperate or things can just get way worse, even violent. Sometimes it takes many years for a person to realize they want someone else, maybe even decades.

[AjayC]

It's really just the gay community getting pissed off.

LOL at this quote: "Since California has decided to protect traditional marriage, I think it would be hypocritical of us not to sacrifice some of our own rights to protect traditional marriage even more"

owned.

[BellaBleu]

Doubt it. Divorce does bring in some nice tax for the cash-strapped state...

[AjayC]

Oh, and incase you non-californians don't know. That quote is referring to Proposition 8, which banned gay marriage in the state.


I'm not sure how much coverage that got outside of my great state

[Noitidart]

Nah divorce is important. People just go ok we're getting married then they get to know each other. Divorce is needed.

[iargue]

Nah divorce is important. People just go ok we're getting married then they get to know each other. Divorce is needed.

It means they wont do that shit anymore. They will instead actually fucking wait till they know each other.


I didnt read the artice... I hope they include an exclusion for cheating lying dirty whores.

[BellaBleu]

It means they wont do that shit anymore. They will instead actually fucking wait till they know each other.


I didnt read the artice... I hope they include an exclusion for cheating lying dirty whores.

But that is like the gray area...people can claim their spouse is what you just said and circumvent the point of the law

[iargue]

But that is like the gray area...people can claim their spouse is what you just said and circumvent the point of the law

At which point I guess I'll just result to killing her. No way I am spending my life associated to someone who betrayed me.

[Melchoire]

Not gonna happen. Case closed.

Edit: After reading it the guy makes a really good an legitimate point. But it's still not gonna happen.

Edited by Melchoire, 01 December 2009 - 11:10 PM.

[akira4444]

That means celebrities who marry for five minutes have to say with their spouse as a result of a drunken night on the town.

Hear that, Britney? Lol lol.

[Mr. Hobo]

At which point I guess I'll just result to killing her. No way I am spending my life associated to someone who betrayed me.

Or you could just live in separate homes and not interact with each other

[iargue]

Or you could just live in separate homes and not interact with each other

I'm not spending a single fucking cent on that bitch. Ever. And, I'm not associating my name to her, or taking responsibility for anything she has done. I'm not visiting her in the hospital, and definitely do not want her visiting me. Hell, I never ever want to see or hear from her.

Divorce is the only damn option. And if thats illegal, I guess I'll have to go to the illegal act that I can still commit. Murder.

[ShadowLink64]

There's a reason why 50% of marriages end in divorce.... the people don't belong with the other person, enough said. Take away divorce, and then watch what happens (ie. the kind of stuff iargue is talking about).

Just because the web designer guy who's pushing this is happily married, doesn't mean everyone will be/is.

[xZel]

Why do people have so much free time that they can just try and make up laws? Get a damn hobby.

[saif]

They got a hundred reason to make up shit,
yes they're from cali

Edited by saif, 02 December 2009 - 09:29 PM.

[BellaBleu]

Why do people have so much free time that they can just try and make up laws? Get a damn hobby.

Or get a good lobby ;P

[travis]

Has anyone read the article? It's a satirical point-making movement.
Guy is win.

[AjayC]

Has anyone read the article? It's a satirical point-making movement.
Guy is win.

I know! It's hilarious how badly he owns Californians.

[kbbbb]

Maybe it's not so whacko...a little extreme maybe. A few months ago the now leader of the Opposition party in Australia said marriage should be harder to get and harder to get out of, and there should be a return to the laws before "no fault divorce" came in. So people couldn't just break up if they were fighting. You could say that's well on to heavily restricting divorce (not banning it)

[SillyInsaneLittleGirl]

haha i thought it was funny xD

The effort is meant to be a satirical statement after California voters outlawed gay marriage in 2008, largely on the argument that a ban is needed to protect the sanctity of traditional marriage. If that's the case, then Marcotte reasons voters should have no problem banning divorce.

that guy is brilliant! :]