This is an airbus crashing. Silence...silence...silence... boom.
Black smoke and fire explosion cloud.
Could someone please explain to me why, when crashing into the twin towers, this effect is nullified and must mean explosives were used?
What works and what is paused · Email is limited to account activation and password resets.
Posted 13 March 2010 - 09:27 AM
Posted 13 March 2010 - 09:31 AM
Posted 13 March 2010 - 09:37 AM
Posted 13 March 2010 - 10:18 AM
Posted 13 March 2010 - 10:22 AM
Edited by mrPomroy, 13 March 2010 - 10:23 AM.
Posted 13 March 2010 - 10:34 AM
Posted 13 March 2010 - 02:16 PM
Posted 13 March 2010 - 04:11 PM
I think you should all watch Zeitgeist.
Posted 13 March 2010 - 07:12 PM
Posted 15 March 2010 - 07:28 AM
Posted 15 March 2010 - 07:42 AM
Edited by zpoy, 15 March 2010 - 07:42 AM.
Posted 15 March 2010 - 07:54 AM
Posted 15 March 2010 - 10:45 AM
That's what I was saying. I don't have a rebuttal for everything, and shit does seem a little strange about it all, but I read people saying 'airplanes don't explode like that' and 'airplane gas wouldn't cause a fireball like that'. Ask the guy flying the plane in the video I posted... he might disagree.Why did the towers fall down like a demolition? It's impossible for them to fall that fast from plane crashes. It's pretty obvious that this was an inside job, yet it is too hard for people to conceive why our government would want to kill 50,000 people for millions of dollars of oil and more investments in the military.
and this will probably be moved to the debate section soon imo
Posted 15 March 2010 - 12:27 PM
Why did the towers fall down like a demolition? It's impossible for them to fall that fast from plane crashes. It's pretty obvious that this was an inside job, yet it is too hard for people to conceive why our government would want to kill 50,000 people for millions of dollars of oil and more investments in the military.
and this will probably be moved to the debate section soon imo
Shouldn't this be in the debate section?
People who think a conspiracy about 9/11 are called Truthers: http://www.911truth.org/
Personally? I think Bush and his cronies knew something was up and allowed it to happen so the can go to war. But other then that I don't think bombs were placed or anything. I think it was more a "look the other way" scenario.
This is the documentary most Truthers go by, its their "bible":
http://www.loosechange911.com/
Like I said I don't consider myself a Truthers. I just think we don't know everything..
BTW my Uncle and Cousin were firemen from NJ who went to help on 9/11 and both have 9/11 syndrome which is a respiratory illness caused by breathing all the nasty stuff while rescuing and retrieving bodies at ground zero. Of course the government doesn't recognize it (sort of how they were with Gulf War Syndrome). They both had to retire do to the illness and my Uncle is on oxygen alot and isn't as active as he was.
Oddly enough they are Truthers..
Posted 15 March 2010 - 12:32 PM
Posted 15 March 2010 - 12:38 PM
Why did the towers fall down like a demolition? It's impossible for them to fall that fast from plane crashes.
Posted 15 March 2010 - 12:51 PM
No war started over 9/11.
Where are all of these lies coming from??
Posted 15 March 2010 - 03:31 PM
I assume you know this because you have a degree in structural engineering and understand how unique the structure of the WTC buildings were, and can diagram the forces that occurred on the steel? My Graduate Structures III class devoted a considerable amount of time to studying and calculating the WTC structural failure. The class was taught by a professor with a degree in both architecture and structural engineering. If you are capable of doing the math, you will understand why what you said is very poor reasoning.
Posted 15 March 2010 - 03:40 PM
Edited by KitsuKun, 15 March 2010 - 03:41 PM.
Posted 15 March 2010 - 03:57 PM
Meh gimme a break, I watched a video on it. The cuts in the building after it fell and the explosions in the basements/garage (I can't remember) workers/ firemen reported are related to the demolition theory. Heres a link I found on it (This is not what I read to form my opinion)
http://www.rense.com...eral67/9118.htm
Posted 15 March 2010 - 08:55 PM
Posted 16 March 2010 - 01:08 AM
Posted 16 March 2010 - 09:40 AM
If the core was lost at those levels. Then shouldnt those levels and the levels above it fall only? Or could the ones below not handle the weight?
http://www.tms.org/pubs/journals/JOM/0112/Eagar/eagar-0112.html
meh
I don't know what to believe anymore.
Posted 17 March 2010 - 10:00 AM
Afghanistan was invaded due to the 9/11 incident. And no, you didn't go to Iraq because the UN told you to. You went to Iraq, because your president saw fit to break international and US law.They didnt fall down like a demolition....
Have you ever crashed a plane into a 110 story building? I didnt think so.
Have you ever blown up a 110 story building? I didnt think so.
Dont give me this bullshit that you know how it crashed, and why it crashed. WE SAW a plane hit it. THIS MEANS A PLANE HIT IT. Are you just completely retarded that you are going to ignore the fact that a several ton plane hit a building?
And we never whent to war over 9/11... Afaganistan = country where this started. We went to iraq because the UN told us to.
No war started over 9/11.
Where are all of these lies coming from??
Posted 17 March 2010 - 03:23 PM
Afghanistan was invaded due to the 9/11 incident. And no, you didn't go to Iraq because the UN told you to. You went to Iraq, because your president saw fit to break international and US law.
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users