Also, whoever mentioned the BNP, I think when you consider the BNPs policies they are similar to the Socialist parties. They are just racist left wing
To the British peeps!
#51
Posted 08 May 2010 - 04:47 PM
Also, whoever mentioned the BNP, I think when you consider the BNPs policies they are similar to the Socialist parties. They are just racist left wing
#52
Posted 08 May 2010 - 07:06 PM
So it's nation states in-a-sentence, eh?Gogo Clinton
How so? It's talking in percentages?
France just needs to nationalize or further regulate their private water industry and control their muslim population. And scale back their military spending
Australia needs to drop it's absurd censorship laws
America needs a major overhaul or in like a decade the bulk of the population will be enslaved by debt they can't get out of
America needs socialism like a a whale needs water. Without water, a killer whale would collapse under it's own weight. Same deal.
China needs to let the yuan float.
Japan needs to introduce birth incentives.
Korea needs to diversify it's industry (true of most countries, but esp. s. korea)
UK needs to figure out if they want to be in the EU or not. That decision more than any other would affect my vote.
Germany needs to find places to invest its riches. EMF wouldn't be a bad idea if Germany were on board.
Greece needs to realize that their people want a left-wing government; that's incompatible with austerity measures in public work forces.
Vatican needs to ban celibacy for priests. Get each and every one of those sad fucks laid.
Canada? Don't know what you need. Less snow. That's it.
#53
Posted 08 May 2010 - 07:19 PM
Canada? Don't know what you need. Less snow. That's it.
Eradicate clear majority act, plan to hold another referendum in 6 months time. If seperation vote passes then Quebec forms it's own country, try to keep relations warm (inclusion in nafta, let them use our currency etc, let any quebecers who want to, move to Canada). Hope western provinces dont follow suit. Pull out of Afghanistan, stop being America's bitch and take the hit to our relations.
#54
Posted 15 May 2010 - 01:21 PM
Oh-oh-oh. Can I just brag a little bit here? I mean did I call it, or did I call it? Front page of The Economist is David Cameron and Nick Clegg in front of Number 10 Downing Street. First coalition in 65 years, first coalition between these two parties - ever. Youngest prime minister in 200 years, and a deputy even younger. Fucking change might actually happen in Britain. Can't believe I'm saying it...Gotta be lib-con coalition. Or maybe regionals with conservatives.
Thoughts on outcome?
#55
Posted 15 May 2010 - 01:53 PM
Oh-oh-oh. Can I just brag a little bit here? I mean did I call it, or did I call it? Front page of The Economist is David Cameron and Nick Clegg in front of Number 10 Downing Street. First coalition in 65 years, first coalition between these two parties - ever. Youngest prime minister in 200 years, and a deputy even younger. Fucking change might actually happen in Britain. Can't believe I'm saying it...
Thoughts on outcome?
lol people called this months ago. labour were gonna lose since 2005, cons wernt going to win outright since 2009.
youngest pm - tony blair
so means nothing
Oh-oh-oh. Can I just brag a little bit here? I mean did I call it, or did I call it? Front page of The Economist is David Cameron and Nick Clegg in front of Number 10 Downing Street. First coalition in 65 years, first coalition between these two parties - ever. Youngest prime minister in 200 years, and a deputy even younger. Fucking change might actually happen in Britain. Can't believe I'm saying it...
Thoughts on outcome?
lol people called this months ago. labour were gonna lose since 2005, cons wernt going to win outright since 2009.
youngest pm - tony blair
so means nothing
Oh-oh-oh. Can I just brag a little bit here? I mean did I call it, or did I call it? Front page of The Economist is David Cameron and Nick Clegg in front of Number 10 Downing Street. First coalition in 65 years, first coalition between these two parties - ever. Youngest prime minister in 200 years, and a deputy even younger. Fucking change might actually happen in Britain. Can't believe I'm saying it...
Thoughts on outcome?
lol people called this months ago. labour were gonna lose since 2005, cons wernt going to win outright since 2009.
youngest pm - tony blair
so means nothing
#56
Posted 16 May 2010 - 08:54 AM
Then again labour only help the scroungers.
Lib dems would have been a better choice, bit late now though...glad they are kind of sharing power with the tories though, clegg might keep cameron in check
3 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 3 guests, 0 anonymous users


