Gayness/Homosexuality
#26
Posted 14 May 2010 - 07:08 AM
#27
Posted 14 May 2010 - 07:11 AM
A lot of guys use those terms a lot. I try not to judge them, but I can't help but think they're stupid.
I only use the words fag or gay when discribing things that are faggy or gay.
Like at the end of the Lakers games where Kobe Bryant and Pau Gasol share a very long, sensual embrace.
How else would you describe such a thing?
*whispers* It's so gay...
There, there, my sweet little rapist. It'll all be okay.
Thanks for the replies everyone. I agree Oreo.
Simdairy: good argument. I also agree that with time, it will pass.
#28
Posted 14 May 2010 - 07:16 AM
#29
Posted 14 May 2010 - 07:23 AM
Since when is calling someone a fag a slur against homosexuals? Calling a guy a bitch doesn't degrade women.
Since guys are clearly not women calling them a bitch wouldn't essentially offend women. However in cases where you are calling a guy gay, you might not precisely know what his true sexual alignment might be. An example of this is if you are calling someone gay in the forums. While you see that the profile clearly says male, you might not know if he's gay.
Edited by SimDairy, 14 May 2010 - 07:25 AM.
#30
Posted 14 May 2010 - 07:24 AM
Since when is calling someone a fag a slur against homosexuals? Calling a guy a bitch doesn't degrade women.
Yes it does. That is the whole point.... T_T;; That is why I brought up the use of masculine collective descriptors earlier.
#31
Posted 14 May 2010 - 07:26 AM
GO BACK TO YOUR CORNER CHEAP WHORE.
lol, let's be friends nao ♥
#32
Posted 14 May 2010 - 07:27 AM
While I'm not gay, I don't discriminate against the choice.
Edited by Ken, 14 May 2010 - 07:29 AM.
#33
Posted 14 May 2010 - 07:28 AM
stfu, you fairy.Since when is calling someone a fag a slur against homosexuals? Calling a guy a bitch doesn't degrade women.
#34
Posted 14 May 2010 - 07:28 AM
While I'm not gay, I don't discriminate against the choice.
Edited by Ken, 14 May 2010 - 07:29 AM.
#35
Posted 14 May 2010 - 07:30 AM
Yes it does. That is the whole point.... T_T;; That is why I brought up the use of masculine collective descriptors earlier.
Quit being so sensitive. You're gay, nobody actually cares.
#36
Posted 14 May 2010 - 07:33 AM
Quit being so sensitive. You're gay, nobody actually cares.
I brought this up as a debate topic... not because I am offended, but because I value hearing other people's opinions on the matter.
Edit: Sim, good point... I never thought of it that way; but it could be degrading to women depending on the situation. A lot of things can be offensive to a lot of people... Lol.
Edited by Mikes, 14 May 2010 - 07:34 AM.
#37
Posted 14 May 2010 - 07:39 AM
Since guys are clearly not women calling them a bitch wouldn't essentially offend women. However in cases where you are calling a guy gay, you might not precisely know what his true sexual alignment might be. An example of this is if you are calling someone gay in the forums. While you see that the profile clearly says male, you might not know if he's gay.
That is a terrible example. I don't know half of the genders of the people in this forum, just when I think I have them figured out someone else says they have a penis/vagina.
And must I say it again? How about y'alls just don't give a fuck and y'alls wouldn't be offended.
#38
Posted 14 May 2010 - 07:51 AM
#39
Posted 14 May 2010 - 07:56 AM
I think that gayness is fine, personally i'm female(and straight). Hope i'm not being baised but i've always found that gay males are more understanding and more 'in-tune' with there emotions.
That is because we are, and FAR SUPERIOR to straight guys.
#40
Posted 14 May 2010 - 08:26 AM
That is because we are, and FAR SUPERIOR to straight guys.
Far superior at being women, yes.
#41
Posted 14 May 2010 - 08:37 AM
Far superior at being women, yes.
Women live longer than men in every country.
#42
Posted 14 May 2010 - 08:49 AM
Women live longer than men in every country.
You enjoy the time where your cock is soft, crusty and you need a cane to walk.
#43
Posted 14 May 2010 - 08:51 AM
Women live longer than men in every country.
Is that because of the lack of genes in the Y chromosome or is it because that male life expectancies are lower because of their work (military,coal miner, construction worker, etc.)?
#44
Posted 14 May 2010 - 08:57 AM
You enjoy the time where your cock is soft, crusty and you need a cane to walk.
That is what viagra is for.
Edit: Sim, there are a lot of different arguments for that. I have heard some pretty interesting ones and they are all pretty valid lol. Not too sure what I think, to be honest.
Edited by Mikes, 14 May 2010 - 08:58 AM.
#45
Posted 14 May 2010 - 11:01 AM
#46
Posted 14 May 2010 - 11:34 AM
Heartbreaking:
Spoiler
Ouch
#47
Posted 14 May 2010 - 11:59 AM
#48
Posted 14 May 2010 - 12:27 PM
Eh only 2-4 of those are realistic, the rest are extreme cases... you can find that in anything. Also depends on the location.
No matter how much of it you think is "true" there is always more to it and there is MUCH worse going on elsewhere. I remember watching a documentary on being black and gay... it is even worse! And in other countries... don't even get me started. I count my blessings...
#49
Posted 14 May 2010 - 01:46 PM
Women live longer than men in every country.
Not in countries that limit the number of children you can have, and you need a son to carry on the family name. When a country has little girls being thrown away, it's going to affect the average woman's lifespan.
#50
Posted 14 May 2010 - 01:57 PM
Also, I call people fags because they're being faggots. Not because they're gay. Just like I call people niggers for being niggers. Am I racist? Fuck no.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users