I think someone is jealous of someone elses hairrrrr.
If I had his hair. I wouldn't have a job. People dont like people who look like stoner's protecting their money. :|
Posted 03 October 2010 - 02:26 PM
I think someone is jealous of someone elses hairrrrr.
Posted 03 October 2010 - 02:34 PM
People dont like people who look like stoner's protecting their money. :|
Posted 03 October 2010 - 02:42 PM
If I had his hair. I wouldn't have a job. People dont like people who look like stoner's protecting their money. :|
Posted 03 October 2010 - 02:44 PM
He doesnt even look like a stoner, he looks like someone I would purposely take my money too, even if it was just to admire his hair, duhhh.
And if someone like that had a problem getting a job, I can guarantee you that it wasnt because of their hair. :|
Posted 03 October 2010 - 03:04 PM
He doesnt even look like a stoner, he looks like someone I would purposely take my money too, even if it was just to admire his hair, duhhh.
And if someone like that had a problem getting a job, I can guarantee you that it wasnt because of their hair. :|
A stoner wouldn't be so bad. If they looked like:
I might have some reservations.
Posted 03 October 2010 - 03:08 PM
Maybe for you, who doesn't have multi-million dollar data that has to be protected. You might trust him, but the fat cats that own the company would take one look at him and be, "No".
They pay lots of money to keep a lot more money safe. They dont do tattoos, jewelry, any arrests period. They dont do people who are in debt, or gamble, or anything that puts them at risk for needing money.
Anyone that looks remotely like a stoner, doesn't get to protect several million dollars worth of data. Period.
Posted 03 October 2010 - 03:16 PM
And yet somehow they still hire a fucktard like you...Maybe for you, who doesn't have multi-million dollar data that has to be protected. You might trust him, but the fat cats that own the company would take one look at him and be, "No".
They pay lots of money to keep a lot more money safe. They dont do tattoos, jewelry, any arrests period. They dont do people who are in debt, or gamble, or anything that puts them at risk for needing money.
Anyone that looks remotely like a stoner, doesn't get to protect several million dollars worth of data. Period.
Posted 03 October 2010 - 03:16 PM
I don't have tattoos, jewelery, any arrests, i'm not in debt, and i don't gamble.
Guess i can do your job!
Posted 03 October 2010 - 03:27 PM
Clearly you missed the part about being a stoner.
And thats physical requirements. Unless you know how to secure a domain, or even what a domain is, you wouldn't be able to do this job.
Posted 03 October 2010 - 03:31 PM
And yet somehow they still hire a fucktard like you...
I guess no system is perfect.
Securing a domain, ha.
Posted 03 October 2010 - 03:43 PM
They higher me because I know what I am doing. Regardless of what you're personal opinion is of me, I do happen to have more then 20 industry grade certifications, and have 7 years worth of experience in this field. So you may think that I am stupid, but you know nothing whatsoever about me.
I fail to see the joke. :|
Posted 03 October 2010 - 03:47 PM
You're a laugh and a half, man.
"They higher me because i know what i am doing."
That would have sounded great if you spelled hire right.
Posted 03 October 2010 - 03:52 PM
Posted 03 October 2010 - 03:53 PM
Dont misquote me.
Posted 03 October 2010 - 03:56 PM
Posted 03 October 2010 - 04:10 PM
Dont misquote me.
Posted 03 October 2010 - 08:32 PM
Posted 03 October 2010 - 09:36 PM
Posted 03 October 2010 - 11:29 PM
No he doesn't.He has the banhammer... I'm already scared lol
Posted 04 October 2010 - 06:33 AM
Busted out the Rasta Sherpa Hat.
2nd Place or Bust.
Posted 04 October 2010 - 10:51 AM
Could we get a picture where your facial features AREN'T all bleached out by Oprah-cam? Everyone looks good when you can't see their face.
Posted 04 October 2010 - 01:55 PM
That's true.
And if it's like a body shot it's some girl bending down so the boys can oggle at their cleavage. Sure it's nice and all but how can we judge anyone if there's no actual clear picture of body and the face?
Posted 04 October 2010 - 02:38 PM
Posted 04 October 2010 - 03:03 PM
That's true.
No offense to other people here, but mainly this applies to girls on this forum. How come there's no actual like... you know, pictures. Pictures without the myspace angles, blurriness and high exposure and contrast? And if it's like a body shot it's some girl bending down so the boys can oggle at their cleavage. Sure it's nice and all but how can we judge anyone if there's no actual clear picture of body (no bending down or doing some obscene pose) and the face?
Posted 04 October 2010 - 05:44 PM
If there's cleavage, who needs a face?
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users