7 replies to this topic

[iloveorange]

It seems like it wouldn't be too terribly difficult for some superior codexians. I also know nothing about auto players, just a suggestion.

[Torque]

i feel like this would be extremely trackable and easily freezable since youre playing actual people

[RealRacingFan]

This would be great, but as in the above post, you'd be tracked and you're gonna be playing against real people. So, it's better off making 2 accounts and playing KQ.

[jcrdude]

Think again.

First off, this obviously can't just be sent because you are competing against other people.

Next, all the games are click-oriented IIRC. This would require any program to actually load the game and not just simulate it like every program does.

Next, TNT changes the game line-up sporadically. This would require a new solution to be developed for the new minigame.

Next, it's still a board game. Even without program-caliber skills, a lucky player could still theoretically win.

Next, you need to consider a problem that exists in Player v. Player. Typically the person with the fastest computer and connection speed wins. This would likely be the case with a Bot v. Bot game.

Lastly, there's the ethical question. Which is less ethical:

• Botting restocking where there are often hundreds of people refreshing a shop... and even a bot can't GUARANTEE a competitive buy against skilled people.
• Botting in a 1-on-1 game. You would be specifically targeting one person and saying "You don't stand a chance of winning this game."

If you are winning every single game, pretty soon nobody will want to play you anymore... unless you use a side account, but that gets back to the original suggestion.

[iloveorange]

Think again.

First off, this obviously can't just be sent because you are competing against other people.

Next, all the games are click-oriented IIRC. This would require any program to actually load the game and not just simulate it like every program does.

Next, TNT changes the game line-up sporadically. This would require a new solution to be developed for the new minigame.

Next, it's still a board game. Even without program-caliber skills, a lucky player could still theoretically win.

Next, you need to consider a problem that exists in Player v. Player. Typically the person with the fastest computer and connection speed wins. This would likely be the case with a Bot v. Bot game.

Lastly, there's the ethical question. Which is less ethical:

• Botting restocking where there are often hundreds of people refreshing a shop... and even a bot can't GUARANTEE a competitive buy against skilled people.
• Botting in a 1-on-1 game. You would be specifically targeting one person and saying "You don't stand a chance of winning this game."

If you are winning every single game, pretty soon nobody will want to play you anymore... unless you use a side account, but that gets back to the original suggestion.

dream killer! :* ( thanks for looking though.

[J03]

Bot vs. Bot, who will win?

[Faval]

The one with the better computer/connection as he said

dream killer! :* ( thanks for looking though.

He didn't say it was impossible. It's just...not worth it that's all

[flashraven]

He didn't say it was impossible. It's just...not worth it that's all

Yes. Too much effort for an uncool game.