Underage Sex
#1
Posted 06 October 2005 - 03:48 PM
#2 Guest_Xth Cannon_*
Posted 06 October 2005 - 03:50 PM
#3
Posted 06 October 2005 - 04:16 PM
Not nessecarily. It's same as maturity. All an opinion and bullshit.Not all people are in it for the relationship magda, some people love the pleasure Anyways, whenever they feel ready. But under 15 is a no-no
#4
Posted 06 October 2005 - 07:28 PM
Its not exactly the same pleasure you get by eating a burito, but by no means does that mean you should go out and find out what its like.I myself am 13 Iwould not like to CENSORED up my life over some pleasure I could get by eayting a burito. I really think if you are that age and have sex then something is wrong go get a life have friends etc it's alot funner then being pluaged by this for the rest of your life....
I won't say much on this subject, but I'll quote frizzle on this one:
"When you see two dogs humping, it kinda takes the magic out of sex" (not ver batum, but you get the idea)
#5
Posted 07 October 2005 - 07:24 AM
Post your thoughts on underage sex
I really dont care what age I have sex *accept when im a rusty old man then I may start worring *
Underage sex is illegal in many countries, if you get caught doing it you can get in alotta trouble as far as I know. But I really don't get why it's illegal, I think it is the person's decision to have sex or not at the age they are at. So what, I lost my virginity at the age of fifteen and then my mother tried stopping me from dating the girl. I told my mom to CENSORED off and said if she tried anything, I would move out. Shit stopped there between my mom and me, she wont tell me what to do anymore. Anyways, back on topic.
It is the kid's decision to have sex or not, no one can tell them what they can or cannot do because it's a human right to do what you want with your lives, if it isn't hurting anyone else.
It is rediculous how the law thinks they can tell people how to run their lives, absolutely rediculous.
#6
Posted 24 April 2007 - 04:11 PM
I think the underage sex rule should be lowered, because I don't believe 13-16yos are as easily influenced as the law seems to believe.
#7
Posted 24 April 2007 - 04:14 PM
#8
Posted 24 April 2007 - 04:32 PM
The Jews had it right in the Song of Solomon. In order to have a good relationship you must have all three different types of love and the sexual relations that come from that love is the best there is. There is the dode which is the lust of flesh, the friendship love (which I can't remember the hebrew for), and there is the ahava which is the love which burns from the fires of the soul. Without either one of these loves you will keep yearning for more and will never be truly satisfied. But perhaps I am a romantic.
#9
Posted 24 April 2007 - 04:32 PM
I don't know, I think I prefer wait for someone that I'll enjoy much more having sex, and I discord with urban, is all about love, with love you can get more pleasure than with a prostitute, thats a true, and must say that take a girl virginity is something serious/ blood everything
#10
Posted 24 April 2007 - 04:35 PM
The Jews had it right in the Song of Solomon. In order to have a good relationship you must have all three different types of love and the sexual relations that come from that love is the best there is. There is the dode which is the lust of flesh, the friendship love (which I can't remember the hebrew for), and there is the ahava which is the love which burns from the fires of the soul. Without either one of these loves you will keep yearning for more and will never be truly satisfied. But perhaps I am a romantic.
You've just been lucky enough to find the person who you truly love. Some of us are still looking, and I have no doubt that you're right about sex being the best with the one you love. I'm kind of jealous.
#11
Posted 24 April 2007 - 04:37 PM
Well then it isn't a lie then, is it? At least it isn't to me.
#12
Posted 24 April 2007 - 04:40 PM
No, it is still a lie. Sex may be the best with the person you love, but you do not have to love a person to have great sex with them. I was just saying that I think having sex with the person you love would top all other experiences. I just have not found that person yet.
#13
Posted 24 April 2007 - 04:47 PM
#14
Posted 24 April 2007 - 04:53 PM
#15
Posted 25 April 2007 - 01:30 AM
The reason governments have underage sex laws is to protect you. If said participants aren't mature enough to comprehend the aspect of procreation in it's integrity, then they aren't yet ready to have sex. However, people can obtain this maturity at a very early age, so this law is more of a failsafe than anything else.
I honestly have no problem with it. It goes against my religion, which is why I'll restrain myself from doing it until I'm both married and of age.
#16
Posted 25 April 2007 - 03:47 PM
#17
Posted 25 April 2007 - 04:00 PM
P.S. I'm 16.
#18
Posted 25 April 2007 - 05:12 PM
#19
Posted 26 April 2007 - 01:40 AM
So the day before your 18th Birthday, you aren't mature enough to handle it, yet overnight you'll suddenly be able to hand the aspects of sexual intercourse?
I say have sex whenever you want, as long as both reciepents want to have sex, use protection and it's in the privacy of their own home, then allow it.
#20
Posted 06 June 2007 - 01:34 PM
#21
Posted 08 June 2007 - 05:37 AM
#22
Posted 09 June 2007 - 08:13 PM
one under-age kid having sex: whoa! no.
yeah, the laws were put into effect to protect children from pedophiles and the age gap has just been closing more and more. now, there are cases where it doesn't matter as long as they are within like a year or two, but damn. kids don't *really* need to be having sex. it is pretty much a maturity thing, but girls mature faster than boys, so that's where the age gaps happen. smurfie said brazil has 10 year olds getting pregnant... and when you think of it, if they're pregnant at *10* that means they could be having sex at an even younger age since the ovaries and fallopian tubes and all that don't mature until the time they hit puberty.
i mean, really. maybe it's just an "okay" thing in that country, but it's still sick. there's no possible way they could be considered mature enough. they're still kids!
bleh... it's sick. personally, i'd say the minimum age of consensual sex should be about 16. that's when the hormones get to ragin' and they might as well get on with it since they'll probably sneak around to do it anyway.
10 year old moms... *shudders* -___-
#23
Posted 09 June 2007 - 10:06 PM
Right now, I'm 16. I believe there should not be a law restricting sex between people who decide to go for it. Obviously, rape is wrong, but if a 16 and 17 year old boy and girl believe they are prepared, it should be their choice. The law won't stop people from doing it anyway, and why should other people decide how you can live your life? I agree that the best form of sex is with the person you truly love, however, it is up to the individual to decide whether or not they believe that and wish to wait for that person to come. Some aspects of life should be left to the people living them.
#24
Posted 10 June 2007 - 06:12 AM
be truthful guys... most young male teens don't *really* care about love, they just wanna get their jollies off with whoever will give it to them. "hey that mandi is such a slut...". -next week- "oh, mandi, i love you. ()" *does the horizontal cha-cha*
besides, what if they break up? "oh i love you so much! i'd never do anything to hurt you" -two weeks later- "WHY WERE YOU AT THE MALL WITH TRISHA?!".... "uh... she's got huge tits and gives good head?" *SLAP*
#25
Posted 10 June 2007 - 06:26 AM
Yeah that's a good idea.. how about we just push your religious ideas on everyone, too? This isn't America or anything.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users