Quantcast

Jump to content


Photo

Wow.. what would you do...?, NOTE: Somewhat Mature


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
90 replies to this topic

#26 amyjia

amyjia
  • 854 posts

Posted 21 April 2006 - 05:55 PM

Hi! I decided to make the thread here so hopefully Cody's thread will be saved.. ok.. Alias :p

Oh lovely, are you happy now? Too bad I don't believe religion to mean as it's defined in the dictionary.

well what do you believe religion to mean? for reference here is the definition I gave.

religion- belief in and worship of God or gods. 2. A specific system of belief, worship, etc., often involving a code of ethics.


You can conclude yourself what happens when a man "does it" with a woman in a natural form, they become pregnant. That's basically the only "good" thing that comes out of sex. You can't have a child if you "do it" with the same sex, and only leaves personal lust and desire, and that's never good.


do you believe a man and a woman should only have sex when trying to have a baby?

No, if the man and woman are married, I consider it okay.

Also do you believe in sex outside of marriage?

Obviously from my last answer, no.


Well, if a man and a woman have sex without the purpose of having a child, doesn't that also only leave personal lust and desire?.. which you say is never good :p

#27 Ives

Ives
  • 4320 posts


Users Awards

Posted 21 April 2006 - 06:01 PM

[In my belief] It's natural to desire the human flesh. That simple. Theres no right or wrong, just what will fuck you up or not.

#28 Alex

Alex
  • 6640 posts


Users Awards

Posted 21 April 2006 - 06:03 PM

Guys stick to the topic. This isnt debate and the topic's author did not intend it to be.
No more.

#29 Will

Will
  • 2229 posts

Posted 21 April 2006 - 06:07 PM

Nope, it would instead make him a whore tongue.gif

He shouldn't do it at all... HECK no. I don't know... maybe I'm very conservative.. but accepting money for a sexual act... well... I could never ever ever do... *shudders* I mean... the guy's straight... I'm not sure he would even enjoy it... I really don't reccomend it...

Hehe, Tet you have no idea. Guys have imagination. Maybe in real life I'm getting head from a gay guy but in my imagination...a younger Marilyn Monroe is doing the dirty work. I'd do it.

#30 Darkness

Darkness
  • 1432 posts

Posted 21 April 2006 - 06:07 PM

Back on Topic

I am straight and would never consider doing such a thing for any amount of money, especially such a little amount of money.

That is my answer ^^^

#31 RandomNameIgnoreIt

RandomNameIgnoreIt
  • 1828 posts


Users Awards

Posted 21 April 2006 - 06:09 PM

Sex can be with whomever you want however, provided that it is a genuine committed loving relationship between both parties and the intent is eventual marriage.

One of the big problems I see with the sex philosophy of other people is that they think casual sex is okay, because it doesn't bother them personally. Unfortunately, one has no idea of the repurcussions it may have now or in the future in terms of others.

#32 Darkness

Darkness
  • 1432 posts

Posted 21 April 2006 - 06:20 PM

it is a genuine committed loving relationship between both parties and the intent is eventual marriage.

I see it in a somewhat strange matter because it depends. First thing, opposite sexes is fine, provided it's not rape. I also add that to the quote above, preferably.
Personally, I don't think same sex is wrong, I just prefer not to be a part of it, be around it, ect. as can be understood in opposite sex unless I want to for whatever reason. I think right and wrong is pretty much whatever you make it out to be really..

#33 RandomNameIgnoreIt

RandomNameIgnoreIt
  • 1828 posts


Users Awards

Posted 21 April 2006 - 06:20 PM

If the answer to this question isn't obvious to you.... it's time to take a step back and take a look at your life and who you are.

#34 Darkness

Darkness
  • 1432 posts

Posted 21 April 2006 - 06:22 PM

If the answer to this question isn't obvious to you.... it's time to take a step back and take a look at your life and who you are.

Are you implying that there's a right or wrong answer, or that you just don't know your preference? It just depends on if you find it wrong or not.

Edited by Darkness, 21 April 2006 - 06:22 PM.


#35 Waser Lave

Waser Lave

  • 25516 posts


Users Awards

Posted 21 April 2006 - 06:22 PM

Personally I would never want any other bloke to go anywhere near my cock (unless it's a doctor/surgeon, and it was for medical purposes)...for any amount of money.

It would just feel weird. O_o

#36 RandomNameIgnoreIt

RandomNameIgnoreIt
  • 1828 posts


Users Awards

Posted 21 April 2006 - 06:24 PM

Are you implying that there's a right or wrong answer, or that you just don't know your preference?


Betraying your sexuality and exchanging sex favors for an inconsequential amount of money... quite a wrong answer :p

#37 Kitchwa

Kitchwa
  • 3256 posts

Posted 21 April 2006 - 06:30 PM

honestly though, if the guy had to think about it.. he wasn't too 100% straight.. he at least had curiousity..

thats changes everything. So your saying hes not gay but hes sort of considering it...
is that classified as being a bi-sexual?

#38 Kitchwa

Kitchwa
  • 3256 posts

Posted 21 April 2006 - 06:34 PM

ohh alright then

#39 RandomNameIgnoreIt

RandomNameIgnoreIt
  • 1828 posts


Users Awards

Posted 21 April 2006 - 06:35 PM

I think sex is overated and doesn't have to be something holy and special and shit.. however it does make it better when you truly love the person..


Imagine someone you love....

...now imagine them taking it in three places in a gang bang.

Do you really think everything with someone you love can be the same regardless of their sexual history? You don't think it's any less special because they've done the same thing for everyone else that they do with you? ...or more with everyone else?

I'm just trying to figure out how not special you think it is ;)

#40 RandomNameIgnoreIt

RandomNameIgnoreIt
  • 1828 posts


Users Awards

Posted 21 April 2006 - 06:41 PM

It's not that really.. I mean.. it does irk me a bit to think that.. or a lot I guess.. but I was just saying there is such a thing as casual sex.. now don't get me wrong here.. because when it is with the person you love it is a million times better.. but still.. I don't think sex should be help up on this pedestal... hmpf.

I think the saddest part of reading your post was simply me immagining my s/o getting gang banged.. and I was royally pissed.. like a mad rush of heat and anger came over me.. hmpf.. go figure.. fucking love.. lol


Exactly... which is what I meant earlier about repurcussions... Even if casual sex doesn't bother you, or in this example her, it can hurt someone else later...

Which is why I am quite firmly against it :D

#41 Ives

Ives
  • 4320 posts


Users Awards

Posted 21 April 2006 - 06:50 PM

Basically with you there BRKN. There are several things to worry about with casual sex that tends to go unnoticed, including STD, accidents etc. [/End of my personal response to brkn.] As for homosexual acts, I don't see what the problem is with them. I don't like men sexually, but I dont see the problem with just saying "Sorry, I'm not interested" like any other person. Even if there is a god, what someone does in their bedrooms with the same sex is between them and God. Off of that, I believe the rules apply to anyone, no matter what sexuality, what religion, what ideal belief on sex. Be careful

#42 Ender

Ender
  • 4323 posts

Posted 21 April 2006 - 06:59 PM

Never. I'm pretty secure in my sexuality, although I'm fine with homosexuals as long as they don't try to hit on you.

#43 Grizzly

Grizzly
  • <img src ='http://i29.tinypic.com/9iwl5w.jpg'>

  • 3964 posts


Users Awards

Posted 21 April 2006 - 07:05 PM

I think sex is overated and doesn't have to be something holy and special and shit.. however it does make it better when you truly love the person..

as far as my morals go.. well I'm about as immoral as alias tends to go off the deep end.. :rolleyes:


"Some say that sex is overated, but they just ain't doing it right" Lol a quote from Ludacris. Just reminded me of it. :ninja: Anyways back on topic-

We live in a completely different society today and we can't always follow all the same rules of the bible made centuries ago. If we compared ourselves to people back then, we live in a much corrupted society. If people back then saw how we lived today, they'de all agree that we would burn in hell.

Face it, back then people were a lot more religious. Sex was regarded as a method to reproduce nothing more. People were not expected to have sex unless they were married. And that's why homosexuality was so shameful, because homosexuals only took part in sexual intercourse for their personal pleasures.

My point being, those who think homosexuality is religiously corrupt you're probably complete hippocrites to me. Because unless your planning not to have sex until you're married, then you're just as bad sinners in my opinion.

#44 pyke

pyke
  • 13686 posts


Users Awards

Posted 21 April 2006 - 07:10 PM

Never. I'm pretty secure in my sexuality, although I'm fine with homosexuals as long as they don't try to hit on you.

A pretty typical response from someone your age. You've still most likely got a few years of actual "experience" to catch up on before you can say that :p

#45 Ives

Ives
  • 4320 posts


Users Awards

Posted 21 April 2006 - 07:30 PM

Homo sexuality of any type has always been wrong, and will always be wrong. There's no "but's" or "if's", you just don't do it.


Let me start off with the fact I really wouldn't do it. Secondly, what? Homosexuality is by no means wrong. What isn't right is the time people are wasting complaining about it. I've never, and never will, understand how people will say homosexuality is wrong. It's their lifes. If they don't serve so called purpose, then thats helping keep control of the population. Not to mention, gays can reproduce through sperm just like anyone, except without acting upon heterosexuality. As for the flirting argument, its pretty simple. All you have to say is "Sorry, not interested!" like anyone else on the planet. Gives me the urge to make a thread on heterosexuality.

#46 Ives

Ives
  • 4320 posts


Users Awards

Posted 21 April 2006 - 08:01 PM

Can you give me your reasons on why you feel that homo sexuality is perfectly okay?


1. The world is overpopulated as is
2. What people do in their bedrooms should not concern others
3. They create a somewhat surronding of tolerance, something people lack in this day of age.

#47 Ives

Ives
  • 4320 posts


Users Awards

Posted 21 April 2006 - 08:18 PM

The desire for lust in a bad way isn't the best way to go. So I do sort of agree with you there. Of course, I find homosexuality natural, but opinions are opinions. :p

#48 Will

Will
  • 2229 posts

Posted 21 April 2006 - 08:22 PM

Fun fact time!

The bonobo is one of the few animals besides humans to engage in homosexual activity.

Alias you probably wouldn't like them, they have LOTS of casual sex.

#49 Guest_Casilla_*

Guest_Casilla_*

Posted 21 April 2006 - 08:24 PM

Fun fact time!

The bonobo is one of the few animals besides humans to engage in homosexual activity.

Alias you probably wouldn't like them, they have LOTS of casual sex.

I remember those. They have hard time keeping them in zoos because they have sex all the time. Traumatizing to the kids and all. <grin>

Wikipedia is, of course, always to our rescue...

http://en.wikipedia....sexual_behavior

Concerning bonobo...

Social behavior

Sexual intercourse plays a major role in Bonobo society, being used as a greeting, a means of conflict resolution and post-conflict reconciliation, and as favors traded by the females in exchange for food. Bonobos are the only non-human apes to have been observed engaging in all of the following sexual activities: face-to-face genital sex (most frequently female-female, then male-female and male-male), tongue kissing, and oral sex. This happens within the immediate family as well as outside of it. Bonobos do not form permanent relationships with individual partners. When Bonobos come upon a new food source or feeding ground, the increased excitment will usually lead to communal sexual activity, assumedly decreasing tension and allowing for peaceful feeding.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bonobo

Edited by Casilla, 21 April 2006 - 08:26 PM.


#50 Guest_Casilla_*

Guest_Casilla_*

Posted 21 April 2006 - 08:36 PM

That's doesn't seem very nice, comparing our acts to animals :p

True. But if you're argung base instinct, obviously, homosexuality does not go against it, as animals (with no ability to think on our level) practice homosexuality. It is a matter of, whether or not homosexuality was an intended desire or not. Seems like a social behavior, though, for the bonobo, rather than genetic. So it would actually be something you would use against homosexuality, if you bent it right. I don't know - I don't know the research done on bonobos. It seems easy, though, wouldn't it? To isolate young ones and see if they grow up to exhibit homosexual tendencies. If so, then it's a genetic (instinctual) behavior; if not, then it is social. I wonder if anyone has...

It is rather humourous, though, the bonobo. Think of it! Oral sex as a way of saying hello.


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users