Wander

Grats everyone, very festive  

 While I agree that it was irresponsible to film the child instead of doing anything, what right or responsibility does the cameraman have to interfere? I mean plenty of people film police beatings, but not a one of them tries to step in and stop them from continuing.

Obviously police beatings aren't to be interfered with unless you want your ass beat too. 

Filming cops abusing their powers is the only piece of evidence that sheds light on what really happened like in Eric Garners case. They get off the hook pretty easily even when at fault. Cops are above the law so I wouldn't fuck with them. Los Angeles is actually requiring all officers to wear body cameras soon, so maybe things will change. 

I think the author took down Notscript for Chrome :\ 

Here's a script that does the same thing though it's called ScriptSafe:

https://chrome.googl...ahbdbdgdf?hl=en

The one for Firefox is still active though I believe. 

Sign me up for Pokemon, iSketch and Cards against Humanity  

Parents are really ugly about other people touching their kids. It's happened before, and that's why workers aren't supposed to touch other people's children even when they doing stuff like this. It's because some parents will sue the company / store that touched their kid. It's just what people do.

In other words, kids are immune to any sort of punishment for this behavior. People can literally get sued for just about anything in the US (Assuming this is in America). I'll bet the parents didn't have to pay for any of the damage either. ._.