9 replies to this topic

[colt05]

which is more efficient to use for both 1P and 2P fights?

[Pavement]

They're the same for 1P but PCC is better for 2P because of the better icon combination.

[zandra]

i would recommend using sword of light/sword of fire instead of sword of air if u are after the price.


light will have 3 icons blocked by GKS but almost 90% of the bders would have gks for sure
fire will have 5 icons blocked by tabard which is a less held equip

[Pavement]

For 2P, I wouldn't use light as it's too easily defeated by JBR. Earth and Fire are solid choices though because there aren't any full blockers for either of these that are cheap (PCH is semi-fragile).

[Scot]

Anyone with a pteri instantly gets 40% resistance against air. I would get a sword of fire instead.

[themetagame]

I think PCC is better, you can create a bunch more interesting 'icon stackage' with it and (this is good/bad depending on how you look at it) it focuses less on one icon type, giving it more tactical strength when facing a Reflector/Full Blocker/Pteri (but weakening it to shields with wide coverage - like Gshield).


I'm personally planning for something like this as my 'constants':

PCC
SoR
JBR
RoTL

[openu2]

I like PCC better cause it have lot of air icons

[monkeypie105]

The PCC has more of an icon advantage with also having Light and Physical Icons... But as Scot said say the opponent was a Pteri... The PCC gets between 7-14 air icons... with the Pteri's 40% resistance that is cut down to 2.8-5.6 air icons plus the Light and Physical... so in my uneducated opinion... PCC would still stand a better chance...

[Eliam]

I'm jealous of y'all BDers with enough money to even have this conversation. =P

[monkeypie105]

I'm jealous of y'all BDers with enough money to even have this conversation. =P

lol, I am broke as hell besides I am just going off what I read/assume