Quantcast

Jump to content


Photo

Lol'd


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
9 replies to this topic

#1 Senapi

Senapi
  • 23 posts

Posted 18 February 2012 - 04:34 AM

Anyways it's nice that an admin just closes a thread when he knows he's wrong anyways I'd just like a response to my MegaUpload Comparison soul.

Good debate.

But you'll prolly just close this one too cause you know I have a valid point.



#2 Sweeney

Sweeney
  • 1230 posts


Users Awards

Posted 18 February 2012 - 04:37 AM

The topic was closed because you're a bullheaded waste of effort.

Much like this one will be.

#3 Turnip

Turnip
  • woomy woomy manmenmi!!

  • 2511 posts


Users Awards

Posted 18 February 2012 - 04:37 AM

If you have a problem with the moderation and rules, you don't have to come to this site~ :whistling:



#4 Senapi

Senapi
  • 23 posts

Posted 18 February 2012 - 04:39 AM

The topic was closed because you're a bullheaded waste of effort.

Much like this one will be.




No. I compared him being held liable to MegaUpload and Kim Dotcom and he never responded just closed I jsut wanted to hear a response to this


If you have a problem with the moderation and rules, you don't have to come to this site~ :whistling:






Not a problem with rules, just wanting a response to this valid point.



Edited by Senapi, 18 February 2012 - 04:40 AM.


#5 Sweeney

Sweeney
  • 1230 posts


Users Awards

Posted 18 February 2012 - 04:41 AM

No. I compared him being held liable to MegaUpload and Kim Dotcom and he never responded just closed I jsut wanted to hear a response to this

It's not a valid point.
Kim Dotcom was implicated because he was actively involved in promoting the use of MegaUpload as a resource for illegal distribution.

That does not apply to the administrators of this site.

#6 Senapi

Senapi
  • 23 posts

Posted 18 February 2012 - 04:43 AM

It's not a valid point.
Kim Dotcom was implicated because he was actively involved in promoting the use of MegaUpload as a resource for illegal distribution.

That does not apply to the administrators of this site.




That's like saying I sold a guy the tools to murder but I don't promote murder just the sell of "collectibles" so it's ok



#7 Sweeney

Sweeney
  • 1230 posts


Users Awards

Posted 18 February 2012 - 04:45 AM

That's like saying I sold a guy the tools to murder but I don't promote murder just the sell of "collectibles" so it's ok

Uh... yes.
If every person that legally sold a knife, gun or crowbar to a murderer without prior knowledge was prosecuted, we'd have no hardware stores left. Let alone gun stores.

#8 Senapi

Senapi
  • 23 posts

Posted 18 February 2012 - 04:46 AM

Uh... yes.
If every person that legall sold a knife, gun or crowbar to a murderer without prior knowledge was prosecuted, we'd have no hardware stores left. Let alone gun stores.





I never said soul WILL be i said he could be held liable just saying.




#9 Sweeney

Sweeney
  • 1230 posts


Users Awards

Posted 18 February 2012 - 04:47 AM

I never said soul WILL be i said he could be held liable just saying.

Yes. Except that's crap.
Just saying.

#10 Waser Lave

Waser Lave

  • 25516 posts


Users Awards

Posted 18 February 2012 - 04:52 AM

We've heard these discussions many times in the past, we're still here after almost 8 years, that's enough evidence for me.


1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users