Coltom's Diversion from a Pet Trading Topic
#1 Guest_coltom_*
Posted 18 September 2012 - 12:49 PM
#2
Posted 18 September 2012 - 12:52 PM
#3
Posted 18 September 2012 - 12:54 PM
I have tried to give away a white kougra, a grey kougra and an 8-bit with no luck. This place is a little jaded, and mainly deals with high end battle pets or really rare one.
You admitted to being a Neopets spy though so it's a bit different.
#4 Guest_coltom_*
Posted 18 September 2012 - 01:42 PM
Have you not noticed a huge number of freezing going on recently?
Edited by coltom, 18 September 2012 - 01:43 PM.
#5
Posted 18 September 2012 - 01:44 PM
I have postulated the possibility that I am a loyal operative working to restore the honour and integrity of neopets, and rid the site of as many parasites as possible. Only a theoretical pondering.
That could be grounds for a theoretical banning as a precaution, the safety of our members is a priority of course.
#7
Posted 18 September 2012 - 01:54 PM
and rid the site of as many parasites as possible.
W-we're parasites....? ;_;
That's pretty mean, heck not everyone who comes here even cheats D;
#8
Posted 18 September 2012 - 01:57 PM
I have postulated the possibility that I am a loyal operative working to restore the honour and integrity of neopets, and rid the site of as many parasites as possible. Only a theoretical pondering.
Have you not noticed a huge number of freezing going on recently?
If you got a hold of my main account, would you report me?
I AutoBuy frequently, botted 70% of my trophies and AoB'd the rest of them.
Yes or no?
Edited by Ivysaur, 18 September 2012 - 01:57 PM.
#9 Guest_coltom_*
Posted 19 September 2012 - 11:52 AM
Yes or no?
Why do you ask questions when you already know the answers?
#10
Posted 19 September 2012 - 12:17 PM
Have you not noticed a huge number of freezing going on recently?
No...
#11
Posted 19 September 2012 - 12:31 PM
If he did then he should at the very least be barred from trading here to protect our members. Anyone could easily miss that detail and conduct a trade with him, thus losing their account. It's our duty to at least try and offer some protection, especially to our newer members who don't know any better.
#12 Guest_coltom_*
Posted 19 September 2012 - 12:40 PM
Also Mr. Yung, you have my word that you and yours are always safe. My word is my honour. Honour in all things, and in all things honour.
Plus, I think you should ban the person that never trades, from trading.
#13
Posted 19 September 2012 - 12:42 PM
When did coltom admit to being a spy for TNT? I missed that one.
It's been more of a repeated threat.
Phrased, of course, as a hypothetical - the refuge of a coward, in my humble opinion.
#14 Guest_coltom_*
Posted 19 September 2012 - 12:46 PM
#15
Posted 19 September 2012 - 01:08 PM
Which, BTW, I've given my word I'll never take Sweeney off of "ignore", although sometimes the ignore function does not work. HIAT,AIATH.
There should be a rule about not being allowed to ignore staff. There is for virtually every other website.
So a repeated warning, seems to me as though that would be enough. So if I piss you off enough and you have my usernames you'll report me. At least threaten to report me. Got it.
#16
Posted 19 September 2012 - 01:08 PM
Which, BTW, I've given my word I'll never take Sweeney off of "ignore", although sometimes the ignore function does not work. HIAT,AIATH.
Seems legit.
#17 Guest_coltom_*
Posted 19 September 2012 - 01:14 PM
There should be a rule about not being allowed to ignore staff. There is for virtually every other website.
So a repeated warning, seems to me as though that would be enough. So if I piss you off enough and you have my usernames you'll report me. At least threaten to report me. Got it.
What part of my word is my honor was not clear?
Yung have my word, that you and yours, are always safe, from me. Not by my action, not by my inaction, not by any deed.
Also, how the heck you piss me off any more than you already have? I can not even conceive of any possible action that you might take that would top what you've already said and done.
Still, I must admit that no matter what you say, I do find you a likable sort of chap.
Edited by coltom, 19 September 2012 - 01:28 PM.
#18
Posted 19 September 2012 - 01:36 PM
I'm concerned about everyone else. We have a community to protect and if we have a "parasite" we need to heal it.
#19
Posted 19 September 2012 - 01:37 PM
we need to heal it.
Squash it.
#20
Posted 19 September 2012 - 01:40 PM
#21
Posted 19 September 2012 - 01:45 PM
Harder, better, faster, stronger?
Th-th-th-that that don't kill me, can only make me stronger.
#22
Posted 19 September 2012 - 01:47 PM
Why do you ask questions when you already know the answers?
Then I suppose I should report yours on the same grounds?
I still remember the terribly named kougra you posted in your Introduction thread and the account it originated from
Though,,I'm no where near as messed up as you ):
#23
Posted 19 September 2012 - 01:49 PM
If we have some reason to believe that a member's presence on here is threatening the safety of our members, then for sure.That could be grounds for a theoretical banning as a precaution, the safety of our members is a priority of course.
I still believe that this is all attention-seeking though. A good spy, and especially one that is employed by a company as large as Viacom, is one that never creates suspicion.
#24
Posted 19 September 2012 - 01:49 PM
I still believe that this is all attention-seeking though. A good spy, and especially one that is employed by a company as large as Viacom, is one that never creates suspicion.
It's YOU!
#25
Posted 19 September 2012 - 01:53 PM
If we have some reason to believe that a member's presence on here is threatening the safety of our members, then for sure.
If he suggests he's a spy surely it would be impolite not to take him at his word.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users



