Thinking of making a thing that is portable, has a display and is rectangular with rounded corners? Well, DON'T! You'll be infringing Apple's new design patent.
Apple already owns a design that describes an iPad-like slab with rounded corners, patent US D627,777. Now it's got another one and it's much simpler: behold US D670,286.
Filed in November 2010, '286 was published by the US Patent Office on 6 November this week. The scope of the patented design is defined by the eight submitted diagrams, which show a thin rectangular iPad-like device with rounded corners. Here it is:
You can look but you can'ttouchcopy this
The solid black line outlines the aspect of the design that is now patented. Broken lines are added for context. So, essentially, that'll be just a rectangle with rounded corners protected, then.
The previous design patent was more detailed, and included various ridges and trim around the fondleslab, rather than this latest all-encompassing filing that just simply patents a rectangle with non-sharp corners.
It took 15 of Apple's finest to come up with this particular shape; iPad engineering manager Jody Akana, the late Steve Jobs and Sir Jony Ive are among those credited with creating the design.
Apple's protected rectangles are often used as a example of PATENTS GONE MAD, but it's no match for this gem from the US Patent Office Hall of Fame, "a method of exercising a cat", which describes the use of handheld laser-pointer for keeping friendly felines fit as a fiddle. ®
Apple is granted a patent on the rectangle. No, really
#1
Posted 08 November 2012 - 10:20 AM
#2
Posted 08 November 2012 - 10:22 AM
#3 Guest_idonotexist_*
Posted 08 November 2012 - 10:23 AM
#4
Posted 08 November 2012 - 02:08 PM
And then how patents are enforced is even stupider. Allowing a Jury to decide on technical matters they cannot comprehend is a terrible choice.
#5
Posted 08 November 2012 - 04:35 PM
Better get the patents in for the square!
#6
Posted 08 November 2012 - 10:09 PM
I wouldn't worry about the Etch-a-Sketch. It has two little knobby parts that make it different than the iPad. But that's the only difference I can see. I'm sure all the insides are precisely the same. Now you can put your fears to rest.
#7
Posted 08 November 2012 - 10:46 PM
#8
Posted 09 November 2012 - 01:30 AM
#9
Posted 09 November 2012 - 03:44 AM
#10
Posted 10 November 2012 - 02:48 PM
Makes me hate my iPhone.
#11
Posted 10 November 2012 - 03:12 PM
I like how Steve Jobs dies and apple starts suing and starts getting sued as well as making ridiculous patents.
Makes me hate my iPhone.
Apple was not exactly quiet on the litigation front when Jobs was alive...
#12
Posted 10 November 2012 - 03:54 PM
#13
Posted 10 November 2012 - 03:57 PM
I am surprised they got it. So if I apply for a patent for the shape of a square I would get it.
Only if you're secretly on the board of a multi-billion dollar corporation, I'd imagine.
#14
Posted 10 November 2012 - 04:36 PM
I am surprised they got it. So if I apply for a patent for the shape of a square I would get it.
When I think of the biggest square on Neocodex, it is you that I think of.
#15
Posted 10 November 2012 - 05:22 PM
If i didn't already, love you
(ps, i definitely did already)
#16
Posted 10 November 2012 - 06:32 PM
Only if you're secretly on the board of a multi-billion dollar corporation, I'd imagine.
Ya that would be the only problem.
When I think of the biggest square on Neocodex, it is you that I think of.
Thanks.
#17
Posted 10 November 2012 - 06:42 PM
Ya that would be the only problem.
Thanks.I am also the brightest cookie in the shed. Remember that everyone.
I think you mean NOT the brightest....
#18
Posted 10 November 2012 - 06:43 PM
I think you mean NOT the brightest....
Well that was the joke but in the pic it was a pretty bright cookie.
#19
Posted 11 November 2012 - 03:29 PM
#20
Posted 11 November 2012 - 05:53 PM
#21
Posted 11 November 2012 - 06:53 PM
so are you telling me i can file a patent for the shape of a triangle?
If you wanted but I do not know if it would go through.
#22
Posted 12 November 2012 - 02:31 PM
#23
Posted 12 November 2012 - 02:34 PM
#24
Posted 13 November 2012 - 04:56 AM
#25
Posted 20 November 2012 - 05:33 PM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users



