Quantcast

Jump to content


Photo

Codex checks have been taken offline


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
45 replies to this topic

#1 Hydrogen

Hydrogen
  • Neocodex Co-Founder

  • 22213 posts


Users Awards

Posted 12 February 2005 - 08:43 PM

Due to increased security measures that we are taking at neocodex, we have taken the codex checks offline to read over some of the code and make sure it is secure and safe to use on our board system. This means that the programs will be down for the ti'me being but do not fret, the codex checks will be back soon. Shadowlink will be looking through the code for any possible vulnerabilities and then we will reinstate the codex checks like they were before.

Sorry for any inconvenience.

#2 Icey Defeat

Icey Defeat
  • 8298 posts


Users Awards

Posted 12 February 2005 - 08:47 PM

Does this mean someone has hacked them?

#3 Dominate

Dominate
  • 2090 posts

Posted 12 February 2005 - 08:49 PM

Does this mean someone has hacked them?

View Post


might be or just making it where no one can hack them

#4 Hydrogen

Hydrogen
  • Neocodex Co-Founder

  • 22213 posts


Users Awards

Posted 12 February 2005 - 08:50 PM

No one has hacked us but we dont like getting caught off guard so were going to review our code and make sure its secure.

#5 Icey Defeat

Icey Defeat
  • 8298 posts


Users Awards

Posted 12 February 2005 - 08:51 PM

Alright, had me worried for a second.

#6 Dominate

Dominate
  • 2090 posts

Posted 12 February 2005 - 08:52 PM

No one has hacked us but we dont like getting caught off guard so were going to review our code and make sure its secure.

View Post


can I review the source to make sure its safe too :p just joking I dont want too

#7 Gargar

Gargar
  • 4901 posts

Posted 12 February 2005 - 08:54 PM

are you ganna fix that out of memory thing? too

#8 Dominate

Dominate
  • 2090 posts

Posted 12 February 2005 - 09:11 PM

are you ganna fix that out of memory thing? too

View Post


only you can fix that  :p

#9 xx_WLT_xx

xx_WLT_xx
  • 2471 posts

Posted 12 February 2005 - 09:15 PM

Hydro meant SL64's checking the Codex Checks mod they made for IPB for any vulnerabilities like SQL injection, URL Spoof etc. thingies :p so that the check will not be crackable.

#10 Gnome

Gnome
  • Alpha As Fuck

  • 1054 posts


Users Awards

Posted 12 February 2005 - 09:17 PM

WEll hurry up already!! ... just messin! :p

#11 Raui

Raui
  • 5687 posts


Users Awards

Posted 12 February 2005 - 09:34 PM

lol take your ti'me :p aslong as I get to finall;y use codex programs and the checks work go right ahead :p

#12 Icey Defeat

Icey Defeat
  • 8298 posts


Users Awards

Posted 12 February 2005 - 09:42 PM

Lol, anything is crackable... just somethings arent crackable yet but someday they will be

#13 Faisal

Faisal
  • 1989 posts

Posted 12 February 2005 - 09:43 PM

Lol, anything is crackable... just somethings arent crackable yet but someday they will be

View Post


because everyone learn something everyday :p

#14 Hydrogen

Hydrogen
  • Neocodex Co-Founder

  • 22213 posts


Users Awards

Posted 12 February 2005 - 09:43 PM

Lol, anything is crackable... just somethings arent crackable yet but someday they will be

View Post

naw, everything is crackable right now...just we havent worked hard enough to find its crack yet :p

#15 Gnome

Gnome
  • Alpha As Fuck

  • 1054 posts


Users Awards

Posted 12 February 2005 - 09:45 PM

check the rear end ... That usually has Cracks :p LOL ... GL on finding that special "crack"!

#16 Gargar

Gargar
  • 4901 posts

Posted 12 February 2005 - 09:50 PM

... hoe do I fix the out of memory thing?

#17 SteWieH

SteWieH
  • 3423 posts

Posted 12 February 2005 - 10:02 PM

as far as the out fo memory here is no solution to te problem yet so please stop asking. it will be checked out in due ti'me and a solution come out if there is one

#18 xx_WLT_xx

xx_WLT_xx
  • 2471 posts

Posted 12 February 2005 - 11:32 PM

They only check the scripts used. The DLL is up to Mumei :D

And oh, you CAN actually crack the program :p if the author is not careful.. like not closing the DLL before sending the user a message that the program is inactive... hmmm :ermm:

#19 Robert

Robert
  • 6934 posts


Users Awards

Posted 13 February 2005 - 01:24 AM

:p ok then well they better be back today hopefully, I got a whole load of programs to run :D :D

#20 414de7fe6

414de7fe6
  • 2559 posts

Posted 13 February 2005 - 02:29 AM

naw, everything is crackable right now...just we havent worked hard enough to find its crack yet :p

View Post

I'll give you one thing I've found out while trying to crack the dll..

The out of memory error is a few open bytes in the file headers. Inject a overpass dll into that dll and the thing is corrupted. I'm trying to find a chaOS emulator so I can show you what I mean..

Also editing the libaries mentioned in the hex opened dll screwes it up, changing int to str and str to int provides some interesting results.

#21 pyke

pyke
  • 13686 posts


Users Awards

Posted 13 February 2005 - 06:37 AM

Damn, Euph your crazy :)

#22 DeathKnightX

DeathKnightX
  • 183 posts

Posted 13 February 2005 - 07:06 AM

YAY!!!!!!!
Now I can use Noitidart's programs.  :)

#23 ShadowLink64

ShadowLink64
  • 16735 posts


Users Awards

Posted 13 February 2005 - 07:51 AM

Yeah, what WLT said is correct. I forgot to include routines that check the input variables for any SQL characters and other potentially dangerous code. Once I get home tonight, I will review the code and make all the changes to it.

#24 Icey Defeat

Icey Defeat
  • 8298 posts


Users Awards

Posted 13 February 2005 - 08:07 AM

Lookin forward to it Shadow

#25 Dark_Sniper

Dark_Sniper
  • 1726 posts

Posted 13 February 2005 - 08:08 AM

oh so thats why I couldnt use one of Noits progs I thought I was banned or somthing :)


1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users