Quantcast

What works and what is paused · Email is limited to account activation and password resets.

Jump to content


Photo

Ghost Recon


  • Please log in to reply
20 replies to this topic

#1 cokiwah

cokiwah
  • 1655 posts

Posted 19 January 2006 - 04:18 PM

Posted Image

Posted Image

Posted Image

Posted Image

Advertisement

    #2 Guest_Xth Cannon_*

    Guest_Xth Cannon_*

    Posted 19 January 2006 - 04:39 PM

    Bottom one. None of them show up as transparent for me.

    #3 Eggy

    Eggy
    • Banned from trading - Do not trade with this user.

    • 1783 posts


    Users Awards

    Posted 19 January 2006 - 04:40 PM

    Top one. The bottom one is too... I don't know how to explain

    #4 hoju

    hoju
    • 1831 posts

    Posted 19 January 2006 - 04:44 PM

    Top one
    It's got more depth :o

    #5 Ukali

    Ukali
    • 22 posts

    Posted 19 January 2006 - 04:45 PM

    Bottom.

    #6 cokiwah

    cokiwah
    • 1655 posts

    Posted 19 January 2006 - 04:53 PM

    I'll make this a poll... :p

    nvm u can't lol

    #7 Sakura

    Sakura
    • 2180 posts

    Posted 19 January 2006 - 04:56 PM

    The last one is the only transparent one for Firefox.
    I like the bottom one more. THe render looks worse, but it fits with the background better. =/

    #8 SupermanFTM

    SupermanFTM
    • 5817 posts


    Users Awards

    Posted 19 January 2006 - 05:26 PM

    Last one is the only transparent, I think .gif and .png are the files that appear transparent in Firefox. Also, I like the bottom one, it fits better since there are light sources, and it's during the day ^_^

    #9 stefan

    stefan
    • 548 posts

    Posted 19 January 2006 - 05:33 PM

    I don't see difference

    #10 cokiwah

    cokiwah
    • 1655 posts

    Posted 19 January 2006 - 05:40 PM

    I can always brighten up the render... but... yea lol.

    #11 rage

    rage
    • 35 posts

    Posted 19 January 2006 - 07:33 PM

    Err, did you do anything to it other than make it into a sig?

    #12 cokiwah

    cokiwah
    • 1655 posts

    Posted 19 January 2006 - 07:38 PM

    Err, did you do anything to it other than make it into a sig?

    Err why do people always assume when they see a nice background that fits well with the render to be not be made by them?

    And I used a wallpaper, I cut the render myself, and changed parts of the background to look like that, and even though that is still half u shouldn't assume things like that...

    #13 Cory

    Cory
    • Dinnerbone'd

    • 7487 posts


    Users Awards

    Posted 19 January 2006 - 07:42 PM

    I like the top one the bets.

    The PNG file shows up transparent in my browser (firefox)

    #14 ATHFBlink

    ATHFBlink
    • 1920 posts

    Posted 19 January 2006 - 07:52 PM

    TOP


    bottem is dull

    #15 rage

    rage
    • 35 posts

    Posted 19 January 2006 - 09:07 PM

    Err why do people always assume when they see a nice background that fits well with the render to be not be made by them?

    And I used a wallpaper, I cut the render myself, and changed parts of the background to look like that, and even though that is still half u shouldn't assume things like that...


    It's not like you made the background...
    I mean when I see:

    Posted Image

    that, it doesn't seem much different..other than the render being moved down..I dont see anything else different.

    #16 soulforger

    soulforger
    • 377 posts

    Posted 19 January 2006 - 09:28 PM

    bottom, seems more blend in to the background.

    Hmm... You expected jpg file to be transparent O_o "

    The right side of the render doesn't seem to taken from the wallpaper.

    #17 cokiwah

    cokiwah
    • 1655 posts

    Posted 20 January 2006 - 12:50 PM

    It's not like you made the background...
    I mean when I see:

    Posted Image

    that, it doesn't seem much different..other than the render being moved down..I dont see anything else different.

    and if you haven't noticed... it says 20% complete... <_<

    The right side of the render doesn't seem to taken from the wallpaper.

    ur right :p

    #18 rage

    rage
    • 35 posts

    Posted 20 January 2006 - 01:50 PM

    and if you haven't noticed... it says 20% complete... <_<


    ur right :p

    I'm not trying to offend you..I was just seeing what you did to it.
    I don't see how you can tell your different percents..I dont see how 80% more can make anything different..you didnt make the background, other than the small smudge on the right..
    so what more would you add..

    So.

    Err why do people always assume when they see a nice background that fits well with the render to be not be made by them?


    I guess I was assuming right...?

    #19 XenoCyde

    XenoCyde
    • 4223 posts

    Posted 20 January 2006 - 01:55 PM

    ?? why go to all that trouble to show 2 sigs? XD

    top

    u didnt do very much to it, yet :o

    #20 Silk

    Silk
    • 6906 posts


    Users Awards

    Posted 20 January 2006 - 02:44 PM

    Top one definetly
    Just to clear this up for you
    .jpg does NOT support transparency
    .png supports transparency in firefox but in internet explorer it shows up blue
    .gif supports transparency in both firefox and ie so use .gif

    #21 cokiwah

    cokiwah
    • 1655 posts

    Posted 20 January 2006 - 06:51 PM

    ?? why go to all that trouble to show 2 sigs? XD

    top

    u didnt do very much to it, yet :o

    incredibly bored lol


    1 user(s) are reading this topic

    0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users