Paul McCartney or John Lennon?
#1
Posted 12 March 2006 - 11:12 AM
#2
Posted 12 March 2006 - 12:16 PM
#3
Posted 12 March 2006 - 12:23 PM
#4
Posted 12 March 2006 - 12:28 PM
#5
Posted 12 March 2006 - 12:37 PM
#6
Posted 12 March 2006 - 12:41 PM
#7
Posted 12 March 2006 - 12:46 PM
Edit:
First part I mean close to the end of the Beatles and during their solo careers.
Edited by dck, 12 March 2006 - 12:46 PM.
#8
Posted 12 March 2006 - 12:49 PM
Anywho... John Lennon. Just because I like his voice better for the most part But really... why not add all the Beatles into the equation?
But I like Ringo... just because... hell. His name's Ringo.
#9
Posted 12 March 2006 - 12:53 PM
#10
Posted 12 March 2006 - 01:02 PM
#11
Posted 12 March 2006 - 01:59 PM
He was up for parole last year I think. Personally I was all for letting him out of jail considering he would have taken about 5 steps out of the facility then gotten killed by anyone in the vicinity.A die hard fan thought he sold out. He was singing about everyone being equal, peace and love and all that, yet was living it up with loads of moolah. Also, the fan was mental.
#12
Posted 12 March 2006 - 02:01 PM
#13
Posted 12 March 2006 - 02:04 PM
Rubbish I tell thee..
RUBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBISH.
#14
Posted 12 March 2006 - 02:07 PM
#15
Posted 12 March 2006 - 02:11 PM
#16
Posted 12 March 2006 - 02:45 PM
I still prefer John Lennon though
#17
Posted 12 March 2006 - 02:54 PM
#18
Posted 12 March 2006 - 03:02 PM
I understand why they're popular, but I don't understand why the Beatles were/are.
#19
Posted 12 March 2006 - 04:17 PM
Revolutionary to their time I guess.I never got what was good about them. Queen, I understand, GnR I understand, Metallica, Iron Madien, Slipknot, The Streets, most mainstream crap, Disturbed and all emo shit, I can understand.
I understand why they're popular, but I don't understand why the Beatles were/are.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users