84 replies to this topic

[supatyson]

That looks awesome, sounds like its going to be fantastic aswell, not many more ideas you could get, youve got alot of the good stuff.

Do you care about how many things the Autobuyer can help, things like Autoplayers or whatever. Maybe something like Cliffhanger Autoplayer, makes an easy 1500. Or something.

[sockopen]

Any idea on how fast this may be? I assume faster then a VB program since vb is rather slow....

I'm guessing 0.3 seconds. Don't quote me on that guess.




I'm going to try and keep it AutoBuyer related; a banker, tiller, safety deposit box, all that stuff is pretty relevant, not going to create an all in one program, I already did one of those. =P

http://img.photobuck...kassprogram.jpg

[Noitidart]

I'm all for a basic version! what you say? Just a plain straigh up autobuyer! woo simplicity my fav

[japser_be]

is the aber gonna be free for public
or just advanced member and above ?

[sockopen]

is the aber gonna be free for public
or just advanced member and above ?

I'll do what I can to have as public as possible, it will probably be Advanced Member+.

[Sean]

I'll do what I can to have as public as possible, it will probably be Advanced Member+.

Aren't the rules that all AutoBuyers HAVE to be in Private or above?

Edited by Sean, 07 April 2006 - 11:38 AM.

[Mr. Hobo]

I think your mean Private Member+. Advanced members don't have there own catagory.

[Silk]

Aren't the rules that all AutoBuyers HAVE to be in Private or above?

Yup, you won't be permitted to submit the AB to be available to any group lower than Private. I'd personally put it in Private even if the case was not true, it looks like it will be a very nice program and people should have to work hard to be able to use it.

[supatyson]

A restart button on the Autobuyer would be cool if you could work that in. Im not sure why, but sometimes you may need 2 restart the Autobuyer.

[llywelyn]

Looks good. Personally, I wouldn't bog it down too much with fancy features such as autopricers etc. Instead I would keep it as simple, fast and easy to use as possible. But not that my view matters much as it won't be available to me.

I seldom have enough time to access a computer (I try to post a few times every other day at least though), so the chances of me "working hard enough" to become private is highly unlikely.

[X23X]

Well hear i am reading this and thinking, this is da shit program all good stuff deff submit to private plus as you should have to wrk uber hrd for this.

[Kappa]

I think if you're gonna make an AB, and particularily releasing it to Private+, it'd be interesting to have something that checks to see if the restock system changed, and if it is, stops. Like if it's no longer just click the pet it shows, so that you don't get frozen if it does change. Could possibly screw up for some peoples computers, so it'd be nice to have it toggleable.

[Bryan]

I'm all with simplicity as well. Just make it fast and reliable. Multi-Accounts are nice, but they aren't needed.

Fast & Reliable, that's all that should be needed...

[Freddy]

I agree with Zaiban. With multi accounts you get more stuff and if it isn't fast then why even bother using it?

[Slubbz]

This is all you need

the timing should look like this

"Refresh between X and Y seconds when no rs"
"Refresh between A and B seconds when rs"

load a list
have 3 option buttons - send items to sdb/shop/leave inventory
click start

if ya wanna be fancy, make multi-account

have the proggy auto enter like a.. 98%-103% haggle

Edited by Degaware, 07 April 2006 - 07:04 PM.

[Ilya]

just let it buy an item from shop automaticly and thats it, no one uses any other features really... there are seperate programs for that...

[Freddy]

I agree with Adobe. Skip all of those lines of code and just buy the thing.

[Noitidart]

For multi accounts all you have to do is run multiple copies of the prog

[Lemonblood]

God, I hate the private AB laws. The maker should get to choose.

[Ilya]

o some private abers only allow 1 aber per perosn that sucks...
Too bad we wont get to see this aber lol

[Ender]

God, I hate the private AB laws. The maker should get to choose.

If the program is hosted and endorsed on NeoCodex, we get to choose.

It's a matter of NeoCodex's security - would you rather have NeoCodex with an ABer in private or no codex at all? Personally, I would choose the first option.

[Hawk]

o some private abers only allow 1 aber per perosn that sucks...
Too bad we wont get to see this aber lol

Too bad- I mean, its really hard to post twice a day. Then apply once every two months to become private. Oh no, we might die. Its way too stressful

[Balistix]

2 post a day is hard? .. i personally dont think so lol.

@ender : Agrees *nodsnods*

[Ilya]

Too bad- I mean, its really hard to post twice a day. Then apply once every two months to become private. Oh no, we might die. Its way too stressful

Too bad you wont get to see it either hawk...

and ender, dont argue like you know what you saying... you only saying that because your an smod... you got access to everything... If i was an smod hell yea i would like a private aber....

Anyway I dont play neo anymore...

[Hawk]

2 post a day is hard? .. i personally dont think so lol.

@ender : Agrees *nodsnods*

You didnt detect my sarcasm? Next time I will go like this [sarcasm] Blah Blah whatever I feel like saying [/sarcasm]

Would you know then