The UN makes clear how much of a joke it is. Discuss.
Iran elected to UN disarmament commission
Started by RandomNameIgnoreIt, Apr 20 2006 03:42 PM
26 replies to this topic
#2 Guest_Casilla_*
Guest_Casilla_*
Posted 20 April 2006 - 03:44 PM
Why does this organization still exist?http://www.cnsnews.c...T20060417c.html
The UN makes clear how much of a joke it is. Discuss.
No, really.
#3
Tetiel
-
-
- 11533 posts
Posted 20 April 2006 - 03:45 PM
QFEWhy does this organization still exist?
No, really.
#4
pyke
-
-
- 13686 posts
Posted 20 April 2006 - 04:51 PM
greeeeeat xDLondon's Sunday Times quoted unnamed Iranian officials as saying that Iran had recruited and trained 40,000 suicide bombers, who were ready to attack American and British targets.
"We are ready to attack American and British sensitive points if they attack Iran's nuclear facilities," said Dr. Hassan Abbasi, head of the Center for Doctrinal Strategic Studies in the Revolutionary Guards.
Iran needs to be dealt with. Give their government the boot
#5
pyke
-
-
- 13686 posts
Posted 20 April 2006 - 04:55 PM
I wonder how'd you go about recruiting suicide bombers
Iran doesn't have suicide bombers.
#6
Hydrogen
-
-
- 22213 posts
Neocodex Co-Founder
Posted 20 April 2006 - 04:57 PM
iran is a funny nation people are cool..gov is kinda weird 
I think its good, now they have a voice
people are cool..gov is kinda weird I think its good, now they have a voice
#7
pyke
-
-
- 13686 posts
Posted 20 April 2006 - 05:02 PM
Unfortanately its a voice in a decaying organization with no power. xDiran is a funny nation
I think its good, now they have a voice
#8
Hydrogen
-
-
- 22213 posts
Neocodex Co-Founder
Posted 20 April 2006 - 05:09 PM
eh...it removes some of the western medias bias...or atleast attempts toUnfortanately its a voice in a decaying organization with no power. xD
#10
Hydrogen
-
-
- 22213 posts
Neocodex Co-Founder
Posted 20 April 2006 - 05:17 PM
isnt lebanon an arab state too?damn lucky im lebanese, not arab
its right there with the rest of em
#11
els1
-
-
- 238 posts
Posted 20 April 2006 - 05:20 PM
dont think so im roman catholic most of lebanon is catholic. But we dont speak like them, we speak lebanese which is different to theres
#12
Hydrogen
-
-
- 22213 posts
Neocodex Co-Founder
Posted 20 April 2006 - 05:21 PM
Yeah, lebanon has a Christian/Catholic minority but I believe lebanon is majorly a Muslim statedont think so im roman catholic most of lebanon is catholic
http://www.cia.gov/c...ok/geos/le.htmlMuslim 59.7% (Shi'a, Sunni, Druze, Isma'ilite, Alawite or Nusayri), Christian 39% (Maronite Catholic, Greek Orthodox, Melkite Catholic, Armenian Orthodox, Syrian Catholic, Armenian Catholic, Syrian Orthodox, Roman Catholic, Chaldean, Assyrian, Copt, Protestant), other 1.3%
note: 17 religious sects recognized
#13
els1
-
-
- 238 posts
Posted 20 April 2006 - 05:24 PM
yea but if you go there which I have been there is mostly half half. I live in australia. Damn where 39% better then nothing
#14
Hydrogen
-
-
- 22213 posts
Neocodex Co-Founder
Posted 20 April 2006 - 05:25 PM
Er...alright?yea but if you go there which I have been there is mostly half half. I live in australia
Australia rocks...except there is too much drinking there
#15
els1
-
-
- 238 posts
Posted 20 April 2006 - 05:27 PM
yep its right too much drink and can NEVER trust a girl there most have aids :| damn junkies
#16
Warlord
-
-
- 3988 posts
Posted 20 April 2006 - 05:28 PM
Do whatever it takes to get gas prices back down.
*returns to shadows*
*returns to shadows*
#17
pyke
-
-
- 13686 posts
Posted 20 April 2006 - 05:30 PM
Your thinking of the wrong situation I believeDo whatever it takes to get gas prices back down.
*returns to shadows*
#18
Warlord
-
-
- 3988 posts
Posted 20 April 2006 - 05:36 PM
Your thinking of the wrong situation I believe
gas has shot back up in price and I hear them blaming it on iran
#19
RandomNameIgnoreIt
-
-
- 1828 posts
Posted 20 April 2006 - 06:15 PM
I think its good, now they have a voice
Part of the duty of UN disarmament commission members is to prevent more countries from going for nukes...
...Iran recently did just that, and continues to do so...
Now... they are responsible for preventing what they are NOW doing. They also disobeyed the UNs rules and broke the seals on the nuclear equipment, WHICH THEY ARE NOW PARTIALLY IN CHARGE OF ENFORCING
Do you honestly think they should have a voice on this?
Edited by BrknPhoenix, 20 April 2006 - 06:16 PM.
#20
Hydrogen
-
-
- 22213 posts
Neocodex Co-Founder
Posted 20 April 2006 - 06:42 PM
They should have a voice just as much as anyone elsePart of the duty of UN disarmament commission members is to prevent more countries from going for nukes...
...Iran recently did just that, and continues to do so...
Now... they are responsible for preventing what they are NOW doing. They also disobeyed the UNs rules and broke the seals on the nuclear equipment, WHICH THEY ARE NOW PARTIALLY IN CHARGE OF ENFORCING
Do you honestly think they should have a voice on this?
, its better than to silence them
#21 Guest_Casilla_*
Guest_Casilla_*
Posted 20 April 2006 - 07:28 PM
It has nothing to do with having a voice. Iran has always had a voice. It has to do with responsibility.They should have a voice just as much as anyone else
They will abuse the system - they already have.
But whatever, I am not so much concerned about it. If the US ever does get involved with Iran, the UN will look even more ridiculous than it did when we went to Iraq, because this time the corruption will be all the more apparent.
You guys have to realise that the US only uses its nuclear weapons to, basically, show off. We have more than any other nation, but would we use it in a time of war? Only as a last resort.
Even IF Iran or - any other country - dropped a nuclear bomb on US soil - would we respond in same? No. We'd go in with conventional weaponry and take over the place and not let anything hold us back like we did with Iraq. Everyone is afraid that a nuclear war will start with ONE nuclear weapon - it won't. It will start with TWO - whoever responds.
We are not so irresponsible as to respond.
Edited by Casilla, 20 April 2006 - 07:28 PM.
#22
Hydrogen
-
-
- 22213 posts
Neocodex Co-Founder
Posted 20 April 2006 - 07:36 PM
Thats a pretty bold claim....bush is still in powerWe are not so irresponsible as to respond.
#23
RandomNameIgnoreIt
-
-
- 1828 posts
Posted 20 April 2006 - 07:40 PM
They should have a voice just as much as anyone else
Except in this instance that are being given more voice than others on an order that they themselves cannot obey...
What's next, we're going to start putting prisoners on prison committees?
#24 Guest_Casilla_*
Guest_Casilla_*
Posted 20 April 2006 - 07:42 PM
No, I say that confidently with Bush in power. I'd be more afraid of an idiot Democrat who doesn't understand the consequences of his actions rather than Bush - who, we must remember, makes very few decisions without consulting his very qualified staff. I'm still confident, though, that if anything did happen, whoever was in charge would be suitably advised by his staff and the military on the consequences of landing a nuke.Thats a pretty bold claim....bush is still in power
It's not a matter of jumping the gun. Bush has never jumped the gun before. =P But let's not turn this topic into something about Bush.
Edited by Casilla, 20 April 2006 - 07:43 PM.
#25
Warlord
-
-
- 3988 posts
Posted 20 April 2006 - 10:18 PM
I'd like to take a wild guess and just assume they actually are using the uranium/ nuclear program for civillian power stations
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
