56 replies to this topic

[Vex]

Australia doesnt need no nuclear weapons, we will just weazle our way out of everything. It will go like this

Lets Bomb Australia and kill everyone there
Okay, how many people live there
20 Million
Fuck that, I aint wasting my time on that bullshit....

Australia survies

lucky. I've always wanted to live in Australia. No, I live in America. The worlds going to be like

"Fuck Ya! Been Waiting for this for a looong time."

We're dead

[Ives]

Even with something like this a Nuke would still be deadly effective. Take the Abomb for example that was dropped over Nagasaki killed 60k people instantly and that was from the blast. It then killed well over 60k more from the radiation over the next few days. The Nuclear bombs of today are way more powerful on a blast level. The nuclear aspect of it is actually a un wanted side effect.
This really goes to how big the nukes are. Every ones nukes are going to be different. For example Russia may have 4500 more nukes then us, but that doesn't mean that they are any where near the strength of the US's.

For example we have these subs called the Triton subs *recently declassified* That carry ten nuclear war heads on them. Each sub has enough nuclear fire power on it to destroy every major COUNTRY in the world except for the US and the former USSR. Back when ever I read the story about the Triton subs their where ten *known* subs under the US commands. It was projected that another 25 would be created by the year 2010. Also you have to know that this is unclassified information, so by now chances are very high that we have something bigger out their.

You just have to remember that its not the number of nukes, but more the power of the nukes.

All though I really don't think that it matters on size or number, since its going to go like this.

Someone launches nuke -
Someone else responds with nuke -
Someone else is like Shit guys and launches a nuke -
It spreads like wild fire and half the world is gone -
Australia is like WTF Mate and then we have the end of the world -

The end.....

*(for a animated version of this watch =
http://www.ebaumswor...ndofworld.html)

Funny thing is its true. However, if an accident were to occur, the damages could be easily absorbed by ANEB.

[Cory]

Something like the "ANEB" that you talk about would have been a great invention back around the time of say chernobyl, but if it was a actual attack then it wouldn't do to much good.

I think if something like you mentioned ever is invented then the world will jumps leaps and bounds in technology.

I mean look at it like this if it is no longer a extreme hazard when/if a nuclear meltdown occurs, then the world with start going off nuclear power and so much more can be obtained by such resources

[Raui]

I absoutly hate nuclear weapons. Look at all the testing places. Their radioactive level is through the roof. They could save them for a serious scenario like meteors hitting earth or something that doesnt involve earth. Just like life Earth only gets one chance before it ends. Seriously why cant countries just get along.

[Cory]

Seriously why cant countries just get along.

Wow, You just seriously made a complex question look easy.


really it can be summed up pretty easily. PEOPLE - Politicians. That is why countries do not get along.

[Frizzle]

Wrong Marine, Religion is why countries don't get along.

[Cory]

Yes Religion is a huge aspect, but religion wouldn't take effect if it wasn't for stupid people.


For example lets all hate Jews because they killed Jesus. Doesnt really make since no matter what religion you are does it? Yet ignorant people take certain versus of the bible or other holy references to literal. I think the only one everyone should take 100% literal is thou shall not kill.