I dont quite get it..Whats wrong with clicking the box someones name is in and pressing send personal message?
Fast reply for PMs?
Started by
Something I can fuxxing remember
, Aug 22 2006 11:53 PM
30 replies to this topic
#26
Posted 23 April 2008 - 12:11 PM
#27
Posted 23 April 2008 - 12:19 PM
QUOTE (Kami @ Apr 23 2008, 09:11 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I dont quite get it..Whats wrong with clicking the box someones name is in and pressing send personal message?
Is that a reply? Is it? Really?
Because it's not in this universe...
#28
Posted 23 April 2008 - 12:22 PM
Unless an appropriate modification has already been written which we can use then I think it's too much work for too little return to make one from scratch.
#29
Posted 23 April 2008 - 12:37 PM
QUOTE (Laser Wave @ Apr 23 2008, 09:22 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Unless an appropriate modification has already been written which we can use then I think it's too much work for too little return to make one from scratch.
So, I originally wrote a post explaining how I used one before but couldn't find it... but I found it now.http://forums.dscrip...?showtopic=2578
From what I've seen you commenting, you don't really like his mods though? At least I think it was you...
#30
Posted 23 April 2008 - 12:54 PM
QUOTE (sarah. @ Apr 23 2008, 09:37 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
So, I originally wrote a post explaining how I used one before but couldn't find it... but I found it now.
http://forums.dscrip...?showtopic=2578
From what I've seen you commenting, you don't really like his mods though? At least I think it was you...
http://forums.dscrip...?showtopic=2578
From what I've seen you commenting, you don't really like his mods though? At least I think it was you...
I seem to recall ShadowLink mentioning that a previous modification which we had installed which was made by them left us wide open to XSS attacks, so yeah I'm not particularly impressed with them.
It'd be fine if the admins check it over carefully for any gaps before installing to make sure it passes security checks though. I can't see there be any real opportunities for XSS in that mod though considering what it does as long as it uses the correct IPB methods...
Edited by Laser Wave, 23 April 2008 - 12:55 PM.
#31
Posted 23 April 2008 - 07:49 PM
QUOTE (Laser Wave @ Apr 23 2008, 01:54 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I seem to recall ShadowLink mentioning that a previous modification which we had installed which was made by them left us wide open to XSS attacks, so yeah I'm not particularly impressed with them.
It'd be fine if the admins check it over carefully for any gaps before installing to make sure it passes security checks though. I can't see there be any real opportunities for XSS in that mod though considering what it does as long as it uses the correct IPB methods...
It'd be fine if the admins check it over carefully for any gaps before installing to make sure it passes security checks though. I can't see there be any real opportunities for XSS in that mod though considering what it does as long as it uses the correct IPB methods...
I don't mind installing it but at the moment I am not for installing any new mods until I can do full research on the ones we already have installed and which are taking up too much memory and cpu usage. I don't know if you guys remember but the board panel (which SL already got rid of) was taking up almost 50% of the time to load up the index page .
I want to review each mod like this before installing anything new.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users