woo thats an awesome idea because i suck i will balance out kitchwas team
Graphics Clans
Started by Jeff, Dec 26 2006 08:22 PM
36 replies to this topic
#26
Posted 27 December 2006 - 06:00 PM
#27
Posted 27 December 2006 - 06:29 PM
Two clans, two leaders. Those leaders. Tet and Balmung, fighting for the greatest clan out there
Despite the jibberish I just stated above, I think its a great idea =D
Despite the jibberish I just stated above, I think its a great idea =D
Lawl. That would be fun xD But the main point is to be with your friends and have lotsa competition.
#28
Posted 27 December 2006 - 06:38 PM
Just make some rules, so that their evenly matched and there aren't people who are good at graphics and have had a lot of practice in on clan vs. people new to graphics in another and it should work out fine.
#29
Posted 27 December 2006 - 07:35 PM
Sameeee. Though my opinion probably doesn't matter that much. xD
Same here
Probably I would try to enjoy one clan and make my horrible paintings heh e.e
Ctually I think this ida should be aproved, is great
Edited by G3N3R4T10N, 27 December 2006 - 07:35 PM.
#30
Posted 27 December 2006 - 08:02 PM
Sounds like a good idea.
But no Xiphos + Coki teams. >_<
But no Xiphos + Coki teams. >_<
#32
Posted 27 December 2006 - 08:43 PM
Lawl. That'd be like the ole' anarchy. But I'm pretty sure coki = nonexistant here anymore. But if he does return, no Xiphos + Coki xD
Coki still pops in every now and then, but still keep then away from each other =D
-hopes the idea of clans gets approved-
#33
Posted 27 December 2006 - 08:46 PM
Coki still pops in every now and then, but still keep then away from each other =D
-hopes the idea of clans gets approved-
-hopes the idea of clans gets approved-
Yeah I was just looking at sotw entries and saw his post there xD. So, anyways, yes, still keep Xipphos and Coki away from each other.
And me too, Kitch (luke, right?)
#34
Posted 27 December 2006 - 10:14 PM
Yes as long as we have no.. you know... overly unbalanced teams i think it should be okay but remember the staff should have a right to break up any team if they feel it's much too unfair. We will be discussing this in the leader area
#35
Posted 28 December 2006 - 02:30 PM
Yes as long as we have no.. you know... overly unbalanced teams i think it should be okay but remember the staff should have a right to break up any team if they feel it's much too unfair. We will be discussing this in the leader area
Exactly
Thanks tet
Edit: Wtfux...I have -rep? xD
Added a new idea. Look at my first post.
#36
Posted 28 December 2006 - 02:34 PM
EDIT: New idea/possible add-on?
I think to try and stop a 'domination clan', as Justin said, I think we can try to have different levels of competition, like Amateur, Intermediate, Pro. It's a chance to prevent a dominating clan but possibly a bit more difficult.
The different skill levels would have to be subforums in the tryouts section. The only problem I think this would bring up is having 'Pro' people trying to get into a lower level.
I hate people using Pro, semi pro etc. Since everyone will have a different opinion on what makes something a certain level and since it's purely opinions you can't get a true idea of what level you would be.I think to try and stop a 'domination clan', as Justin said, I think we can try to have different levels of competition, like Amateur, Intermediate, Pro. It's a chance to prevent a dominating clan but possibly a bit more difficult.
The different skill levels would have to be subforums in the tryouts section. The only problem I think this would bring up is having 'Pro' people trying to get into a lower level.
Pro meaning professional, so anyone being Pro for making a signature makes no sense at all. If someone was Pro then they'd be making graphics/web design etc for money, not to show off on some website.
-sigh-
x.x don't take that the wrong way, it just annoys me xD
#37
Posted 28 December 2006 - 06:06 PM
I want Tim and Foogie (Even though I don't really talk to her and she doesn't make sigs ) on my team
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users