David Beckham
#1
Posted 11 January 2007 - 06:20 PM
#2
Posted 11 January 2007 - 06:27 PM
About the money...he's popular. What else is there to say?
Eventually he'll be like..."Oh, America sucks. Oh well...let's go back to England. Cheeri-o."
He WILL get bored. There is almost no inspiration for soccer over here.
#3
Posted 11 January 2007 - 06:39 PM
About the money...he's popular. What else is there to say?
Eventually he'll be like..."Oh, America sucks. Oh well...let's go back to England. Cheeri-o."
He WILL get bored. There is almost no inspiration for soccer over here.
Exactly.
It literally took me awhile to figure out what MLS was. xD
Then I figured it was like MLB.
#5
Posted 11 January 2007 - 07:06 PM
Actually there is a decent following, although obviously not near what it is in Europe or other parts of the world. The people that follow it are young, and cant spend the money on tickets, merchandise, or on-demand type channels to see their teams whole season. Thats my theory anyway.
#6
Posted 11 January 2007 - 07:35 PM
#7
Posted 12 January 2007 - 05:07 AM
#8
Posted 12 January 2007 - 06:16 AM
#9
Posted 12 January 2007 - 10:13 AM
#10
Posted 12 January 2007 - 10:39 AM
Lol shows your knowledge of football.
David Beckham had an extensive and sucessful career in the FA Premier Leauge, I mean he boosted his Man U squad with over 60 goals, with a lethal free kick and a deadly cross, he gathered many more assists.
He was the Captain of the English Squad which must count for something (although you're not English so you probably won't feel as strongly as others do), and scored many times for them aswell.
As for Real Madrid, he played a few games, got a few goals, but Real Madrid are a shit team because they have a crappy team chemistry, trying to buy all the big names, I.E why they went for David Beckham, but not cut out for the starting XI, when you have ZZ, Ronaldo, Raul, amongst others on your squad.
And what the fuck do you mean not stand out in LA Galaxy? He's worth around 130 million quid this bloke, and the top signing for the LA Galaxy is worth 450k. Tell me he won't own anyone? Psh.
I don't think he's done it for attention, or the money, the guys set for life with the amount of cash, him and his family just probably wanted to try something a bit different then sitting on a bench in Spain 2/3 times a week.
#11
Posted 12 January 2007 - 11:55 AM
#12
Posted 12 January 2007 - 12:29 PM
But man, thats a fuckin lot of money for an athelete. Damn I think he makes more money a year than Shaq and Kobe combined.
#13
Posted 12 January 2007 - 12:39 PM
David Beckham had an extensive and sucessful career in the FA Premier Leauge, I mean he boosted his Man U squad with over 60 goals, with a lethal free kick and a deadly cross, he gathered many more assists.
He was the Captain of the English Squad which must count for something (although you're not English so you probably won't feel as strongly as others do), and scored many times for them aswell.
As for Real Madrid, he played a few games, got a few goals, but Real Madrid are a shit team because they have a crappy team chemistry, trying to buy all the big names, I.E why they went for David Beckham, but not cut out for the starting XI, when you have ZZ, Ronaldo, Raul, amongst others on your squad.
And what the fuck do you mean not stand out in LA Galaxy? He's worth around 130 million quid this bloke, and the top signing for the LA Galaxy is worth 450k. Tell me he won't own anyone? Psh.
I don't think he's done it for attention, or the money, the guys set for life with the amount of cash, him and his family just probably wanted to try something a bit different then sitting on a bench in Spain 2/3 times a week.
None of that makes him, or anyone else, worth a million dollars a week. He was a very good player in his prime, a good player now, but he isn't the greatest person to ever play sports, which is how much hes getting paid.
#14
Posted 12 January 2007 - 12:41 PM
#15
Posted 12 January 2007 - 12:47 PM
Yea, but in your earlier post you were making a case for how amazingly good he is. He is very well known across the world, but really...$250 million?
I don't really think hes going to bring near as much to MLS as everyone is suspecting. I think the people that are going to be interested in soccer, already are. I mean, I doubt I'll watch any soccer until the World Cup, and going to a soccer game isn't on my top 10 list of things to do in LA, or anywhere else for that matter. I just think its over hyped.
#16
Posted 12 January 2007 - 01:00 PM
#17
Posted 12 January 2007 - 01:08 PM
Still not as big as A-Rod's 252 million dollar deal. Although he has to play for 10 years, Beckham is only signed for 5
Speaking of the Vikings- I'm so happy Red McCombs sold the team. Now we actually have a chance at doing something good, too bad we have Childress and a POS offense though
#18
Posted 12 January 2007 - 08:07 PM
#19
Posted 12 January 2007 - 09:03 PM
That is a good point that I didn't think of. Its like the Red Sox getting Matsuzaka. He was SEVERELY over paid for, also.
#20
Posted 12 January 2007 - 09:08 PM
Face it, Soccer in America blows. LA paid so much for Beckham so they can make money when stadiums sell out to see the guy from the movie.
#21
Posted 13 January 2007 - 08:41 AM
I can't name two people/teams nationwide except for DB. And that's only because of the Bend it Like Beckham movie.
#22
Posted 13 January 2007 - 09:13 AM
"He is not going to play any more. He will practice, but he is not going to play," Capello said at a news conference.
Beckham announced this week he will not extend his contract with Real Madrid when it expires in June and is instead leaving for the Galaxy and a five-year deal.
"The player's decision is to go to Los Angeles. He has always been a great professional, but a player who has such a major contract with another team ... we cannot count on him," Capello said. "I think one cannot have the same drive if one is already with another team."
#23
Posted 14 January 2007 - 03:30 AM
#25
Posted 16 January 2007 - 07:26 AM
watch and england game and see how many of his crosses/free kicks amount to anything. crosses either hit first man or are too deep. free kicks generally hit the wall 90% of the time
he was good at man U. thats the only good time i ahve ever seen him play apart from his early england career
and how long ago was man U
and 60 goals sounds good at first but i think ronaldo might beat that and he has one of the worst shots I have ever seen
Edited by otherworld, 16 January 2007 - 07:29 AM.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users



