Great, no searching privelages.
Ways to avoid board errors
Started by Icey Defeat, Apr 06 2007 08:37 PM
97 replies to this topic
#27
blahblah35
-
-
- 254 posts
Posted 06 April 2007 - 09:12 PM
im getting errors on every page now. Im gonna go to bed and try for the other 50 tomorrow. Good luck eveyrone!
#28
Hawk
-
-
- 9690 posts
hawk·ish·ly
Posted 06 April 2007 - 09:13 PM
QUOTE(Lemonblood @ Apr 7 2007, 12:10 AM) 
Great, no searching privelages.
Oh no, it is the end of the world! You are without searching privileges for a whole day!
#29
Lemonblood
-
-
- 2830 posts
Posted 06 April 2007 - 09:14 PM
I like my searching privelages, this means I can't look at the latest posts easily.
#30
Hawk
-
-
- 9690 posts
hawk·ish·ly
Posted 06 April 2007 - 09:16 PM
QUOTE(Lemonblood @ Apr 7 2007, 12:14 AM)
I like my searching privelages, this means I can't look at the latest posts easily.
Oh, I see, so you are a lazy piece of shit.
Just click four damn times and you can see any new topic on any forum from any place.
#31
nox
-
-
- 6707 posts
Posted 06 April 2007 - 09:19 PM
omg hawk flamed in a jokingly manner
+10% warn1!!
+10% warn1!!
Edited by speaker, 06 April 2007 - 09:20 PM.
#32
Hawk
-
-
- 9690 posts
hawk·ish·ly
Posted 06 April 2007 - 09:23 PM
QUOTE(speaker @ Apr 7 2007, 12:19 AM)
omg hawk flamed in a jokingly manner
+10% warn1!!
+10% warn1!!
Okay... whatever. Speaker is being an idiot, isn't that warn worthy?
#33
Lim_202
-
-
- 219 posts
Posted 06 April 2007 - 09:25 PM
Thank you for dissabling the searches icey, I have been getting less/ no errors
#34
Ryd3rX
-
-
- 167 posts
<img src='http://www.neocodex.us/forum/style_images/mem_plates/100post.gif'>
Posted 06 April 2007 - 09:28 PM
GJ Icey, I'm getting no errors now.
#35
Hawk
-
-
- 9690 posts
hawk·ish·ly
Posted 06 April 2007 - 09:28 PM
You may not be getting any errors right now, but give it time. This is Codex, shit fucks up often.
#37
Hawk
-
-
- 9690 posts
hawk·ish·ly
Posted 06 April 2007 - 09:33 PM
QUOTE(Lemonblood @ Apr 6 2007, 11:30 PM)
Still getting errors.
I'm still being annoyed by your short posts, which normally are not contributing to the conversation. How about you make a complete sentence next time?
#38
Sean
-
-
- 6188 posts
Posted 06 April 2007 - 09:34 PM
QUOTE(Hawk @ Apr 6 2007, 09:28 PM)
You may not be getting any errors right now, but give it time. This is Codex, shit fucks up often.
Damn homie. Calm down!
#39
nox
-
-
- 6707 posts
Posted 06 April 2007 - 09:35 PM
and let's tally hawk's contribution to the thread thus far...
#40
Lemonblood
-
-
- 2830 posts
Posted 06 April 2007 - 09:37 PM
QUOTE(Hawk @ Apr 7 2007, 03:33 PM)
I'm still being annoyed by your short posts, which normally are not contributing to the conversation. How about you make a complete sentence next time?
How am I not comtributing to the conversation?
#41
Hawk
-
-
- 9690 posts
hawk·ish·ly
Posted 06 April 2007 - 09:37 PM
QUOTE(speaker @ Apr 7 2007, 12:35 AM)
and let's tally hawk's contribution to the thread thus far...
Like you have done much more?
#42
Sean
-
-
- 6188 posts
Posted 06 April 2007 - 09:37 PM
I'm not going to be allowing you guys to take these cheap jabs at each other. It seems like shameless arguments to raise post count.
Want to continue flaming each other? You'll get warned.
Want to continue flaming each other? You'll get warned.
#43
Hawk
-
-
- 9690 posts
hawk·ish·ly
Posted 06 April 2007 - 09:39 PM
QUOTE(Lemonblood @ Apr 7 2007, 12:37 AM)
How am I not comtributing to the conversation?
Three word posts? C'mon, that isn't contributing.
Actually write something worthwhile.QUOTE(Sean @ Apr 7 2007, 12:37 AM)
I'm not going to be allowing you guys to take these cheap jabs at each other. It seems like shameless arguments to raise post count.
Want to continue flaming each other? You'll get warned.
Want to continue flaming each other? You'll get warned.
K.
#44
Lim_202
-
-
- 219 posts
Posted 06 April 2007 - 09:39 PM
I am still getting errors but they have decreased a lot. Thanks again
#45
ShadowLink64
-
-
- 16735 posts
Posted 06 April 2007 - 09:41 PM
I've boosted the limit by 0.5 and stopped all the background shit running... that neoitems cron was causing a lot of trouble anyways so it's permanently removed from the tasks list until we can fix it. The errors should be stopping very soon.
#46
Lemonblood
-
-
- 2830 posts
Posted 06 April 2007 - 09:42 PM
You shouldn't judge someone by their post count, or by how long their posts are.
#48
Hawk
-
-
- 9690 posts
hawk·ish·ly
Posted 06 April 2007 - 09:43 PM
QUOTE(ShadowLink64 @ Apr 7 2007, 12:41 AM)
I've boosted the limit by 0.5 and stopped all the background shit running... that neoitems cron was causing a lot of trouble anyways so it's permanently removed from the tasks list until we can fix it. The errors should be stopping very soon.
K, thats good. I'm surprised you managed to fix it so quickly this time. Normally you don't fix it for like, a few weeks
#49
Lim_202
-
-
- 219 posts
Posted 06 April 2007 - 09:43 PM
QUOTE(ShadowLink64 @ Apr 6 2007, 09:41 PM)
I've boosted the limit by 0.5 and stopped all the background shit running... that neoitems cron was causing a lot of trouble anyways so it's permanently removed from the tasks list until we can fix it. The errors should be stopping very soon.
Thank you also, it must be hard to put up with this so I'm greatful you spend your time working on this
#50
Hawk
-
-
- 9690 posts
hawk·ish·ly
Posted 06 April 2007 - 09:45 PM
QUOTE(Lemonblood @ Apr 7 2007, 12:42 AM)
You shouldn't judge someone by their post count, or by how long their posts are.
I'm not judging by your post count. Posts being to short is annoying though. You add nothing to a discussion by saying something short. Just add something worth talking about, or something that maybe looks like its worth talking about but nobody will talk about, or something that is worthwhile to read.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users
