Windows Vista UpGrade
#1
Posted 16 April 2007 - 06:31 PM
#2
Posted 16 April 2007 - 06:33 PM
#3
Posted 16 April 2007 - 06:37 PM
#4
Posted 16 April 2007 - 06:38 PM
512MB system memory
DirectX 9-capable graphics processor
#5
Posted 16 April 2007 - 06:43 PM
just run the upgrade advisor - it'll tell you if vista can run, but 256 will NOT run vista (even vista basic) and with 512 you will be able to run vista basic, but not Aero for that you need 1Gb min (and for that you also need a pretty modern graphics card) (oh and vista needs AT LEAST 20Gb disk space over and above what you have already got on your disk
#6
Posted 16 April 2007 - 06:45 PM
#7
Posted 16 April 2007 - 06:51 PM
#8
Posted 17 April 2007 - 06:55 AM
#9
Posted 17 April 2007 - 08:32 AM
Edit: Typo
Edited by Popii, 17 April 2007 - 08:32 AM.
#10
Posted 17 April 2007 - 12:27 PM
The only time Microsoft will make something that does not suck is when they start producing vacuum cleaners.
Get kUbuntu.
#11
Posted 17 April 2007 - 12:34 PM
Mine was 256 and 30gb. But then I got a gig of ram and a 250gb harddrive. I regret getting 1 gb, shoulda gotten 512 mbs and saved the rest for my eventual upgrade
And why would you want to get Vista? Not like you can run any fancy features on it, you'd just have xp (with windows blinds or something like that) with crappy drivers
Edited by Mr. Hobo, 17 April 2007 - 12:35 PM.
#12
Posted 17 April 2007 - 12:55 PM
But i bought a laptop maybe 3 months ago and i got the free upgrade and i have been waiting for like a month and haven't gotten it.
#13
Posted 17 April 2007 - 01:18 PM
The only time Microsoft will make something that does not suck is when they start producing vacuum cleaners.
Get kUbuntu.
oh please, so unrealistic. kubuntu is a total hassle to get games running and if you're lazy or bad at typing/searching, bad idea
Vista is great if your computer can handle it.
#14
Posted 17 April 2007 - 02:02 PM
Vista is great if your computer can handle it.
Vista is teh suckzorz. And Linux is more indepth than Microsoft, so what? Some of us need that kind of power. I suggest keeping Windows XP over Vista. Vista is a resource HOG. AMD 2.0Ghz 64 bit processor, Vista was CONSTANTLY eating about 40% of my resources, even when I closed EVERYTHING else out. And it pretty much took 200 Mb of RAM (Through all of it's "services") and laid claim to that.
Stick. With. XP.
nLiting XP Pro gives you the best spee don any Windows platform.
#15
Posted 17 April 2007 - 02:29 PM
#17
Posted 17 April 2007 - 03:28 PM
#18
Posted 17 April 2007 - 04:49 PM
Oy, bad idea.
With only 256mb, KDE will NOT run well.. I'd reccomend Xubuntu on that comp if you're going to reccomend a *buntu distro (I'd just reccomend Xubuntu anyways. I like Xfce )
He -might- be able to get away with using GNOME, though.
I'd much rather use ArchLinux anyday, though
#21
Posted 19 April 2007 - 07:03 PM
It's really not worth $300 though. At all. Don't upgrade unless you plan to bootleg.
#22
Posted 19 April 2007 - 08:44 PM
But yea, only good thing about vista that Ive seen is it looks awesome, which you can easily find something that makes it look the same way.
Edited by Josh0403, 19 April 2007 - 08:48 PM.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users