Soda in Schools? Allow or Ban
#51
Posted 19 February 2008 - 04:05 PM
#52
Posted 19 February 2008 - 07:41 PM
#53
Posted 19 February 2008 - 07:44 PM
#54
Posted 23 February 2008 - 09:15 PM
Pop is a main reason for obesity, if it is being sold there, it will be drank, replace it with something healthy
The kids will still drink the healthy thing if there is no pop to buy, but let them bring it in themselves if they want it.
#55
Posted 24 February 2008 - 10:01 PM
The question of choice, also, is a moral one. Do we have the right to take away the kids' right to choose. Yes and no. Does a 2 year old know that candy he wants is empty calories? That he'd be much healthier and fuller from a plate of pasta and chicken? No. He will choose the candy because it appeals to his sweet tooth, and he doesn't know any better. Now, take that same question, and put it before a 16 year old. Most guys I know and have known will pick the pasta and chicken, 'cause you get more out of it. They don't want the extra pounds, the extra visit to the dentist, enough to eat candy nonstop. Yes, they will eat candy. Perhaps too much at times. But overall, they will make the better choice, because they have learned why it is the better choice. Should we take away their ability to get one soda in a day because they need the caffeine in school more than they do an hour before bed? No. High schools should not ban soda. They should offer plenty of healthy options as well, and at affordable prices, but the choice should always lay with the person. Mind you, private schools are privately funded and the choice now lays with the people who pay for it. But WE pay for the public schools. WE should have the right to choose. And any parent who thinks the right choice is no choice is short-changing their children, and insulting their intelligence and capability to develop same. We may begin ignorant, but given the opportunity, the human mind is, by its very design, meant to grow. This is no less true for our children than it is for us, they simply have less experience.
//end rant (with apologies to anyone I may have offended. it was not intended.)
The Cookie Dragon lets out a very deep breath.
#56
Posted 24 February 2008 - 10:11 PM
Commujism much?
Seriously. It's fucking ridiculous. If people want to get fat, fucking let them. It's your fucking right.
I am opposed to my government keeping me from doing anything that doesn't encroach upon someone else's freedoms.
#57
Posted 24 February 2008 - 10:14 PM
Seriously. It's fucking ridiculous. If people want to get fat, fucking let them. It's your fucking right.
I am opposed to my government keeping me from doing anything that doesn't encroach upon someone else's freedoms.
You ever tried riding the free fall ride at Six Flags. You know how scary it is having some guy that weighs 500+ sitting next to you. It's my fucking right to not want to shit myself because some guy wants to waste his life away shoving hot dogs down his throat. I say obesity should be monitored, not limited.
#58
Posted 24 February 2008 - 10:29 PM
“Those who desire to give up freedom in order to gain security will not have, nor do they deserve, either one.â€Â
-B. Franklin
I will give up none of my freedom. Fucking government tapping our phones, monitor our calls/sms/internet. Must have hit a time warp back to 1984.
Edited by Cataliste, 24 February 2008 - 10:30 PM.
#59
Posted 24 February 2008 - 10:41 PM
Seriously. It's fucking ridiculous. If people want to get fat, fucking let them. It's your fucking right.
I am opposed to my government keeping me from doing anything that doesn't encroach upon someone else's freedoms.
210% agreed
-B. Franklin
I will give up none of my freedom. Fucking government tapping our phones, monitor our calls/sms/internet. Must have hit a time warp back to 1984.
Agreed again, but I wanted to note the phone tapping shit isn't that big of a deal because they don't monitor every single American, only ones who have a higher probability of being a terrorist, but regardless it is killing our privacy
lol, I've been on it, but cant you just wait till you're matched with someone you like?
#60
Posted 24 February 2008 - 10:56 PM
Yes. But read the "Patriot Act". They can tap ANYONE'S phones, for NO reason. No court order. No subpoena to the phone company. They can JUST do it.
That's a step in the WRONG fucking direction.
#61
Posted 25 February 2008 - 08:47 AM
Seriously. It's fucking ridiculous. If people want to get fat, fucking let them. It's your fucking right.
I am opposed to my government keeping me from doing anything that doesn't encroach upon someone else's freedoms.
The real infringement is schooling. (I'm making a thread on that as we speak.)
Theres a difference between basic, natural rights, and convenient rights which infringe upon others rights to make things more convenient for x number of people. You also have to consider that Six Flags is a private company. If you want to get rid of obese people at Six Flags, you can campaign against it without a desire for legislation. The government monitoring our health just wreaks of potential abuse that would do more bad than good in any situation. New Zealand already has ridiculous laws about the health of its citizens which have prevented spouses from moving there because they "weighed too much." (http://www.reason.co...23596.html]here.)
-B. Franklin
I will give up none of my freedom. Fucking government tapping our phones, monitor our calls/sms/internet. Must have hit a time warp back to 1984.
2x
That's a step in the WRONG fucking direction.
2x again. It's a bad thing, regardless of how bad it is, and it's completely immoral.
Edited by Athean, 25 February 2008 - 09:32 AM.
#62
Posted 25 February 2008 - 09:15 AM
Theres a difference between basic, natural rights, and convenient rights which infringe upon others rights to make things more convenient for x number of people. You also have to consider that Six Flags is a private company. If you want to get rid of obese people at Six Flags, you can campaign against it without a desire for legislation. The government monitoring our health just wreaks of potential abuse that would do more bad than good in any situation. New Zealand already has ridiculous laws about the health of its citizens which have prevented spouses from moving there because they "weighed too much." (URL=http://www.reason.com/blog/show/123596.html]here[/URL].)
Thank God someone agrees with me!
REQUIRED schooling does NOTHING but LOWER the standard for ALL students. If you don;t want to be there, then by all means go fuck off somewhere else and let me do my learning.
But I think I have probably gotten too far off subject.
#63
Posted 25 February 2008 - 09:19 AM
Other than that, our cafeteria had a milk/iced tea machine, and a fruit juice machine. So the drink choices were relatively healthy... but once you're off school's time, you can feel free to help yourself to a mountain dew if you really want one.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users


