I saw it
New Member Rank
#51
Posted 28 February 2008 - 04:30 PM
I saw it
#52
Posted 28 February 2008 - 05:31 PM
As for the 1k level there could be Neocodex Avatar, which is a god's representative
#53
Posted 28 February 2008 - 05:34 PM
As for the 1k level there could be Neocodex Avatar, which is a god's representative
I'm not MIA
At least Retired people can still dodder around on their zimmer frames.
#54
Posted 28 February 2008 - 05:40 PM
Then we can call the 1337 posters Leet Members or L33T members
Edited by Toxic-Snipe, 28 February 2008 - 05:41 PM.
#55
Posted 28 February 2008 - 05:41 PM
Then we can call the 1337 posters Leet Members or L33T members
iawtp
#56
Posted 29 February 2008 - 01:26 AM
#57
Posted 29 February 2008 - 01:39 AM
#58
Posted 29 February 2008 - 09:11 AM
#59
Posted 29 February 2008 - 12:35 PM
#60
Posted 01 March 2008 - 05:45 AM
Different ranks for a member who only has to post crap to achieve them is a bit silly.
Perhaps you should implement this system within the Private ranks- because there's always been problems in the past about having too many private members right?
#61
Posted 01 March 2008 - 05:56 AM
New System:
Member level at 0 posts,
Advanced Member at 500 posts,
-something- Member at 1000 posts
#62
Posted 01 March 2008 - 11:23 PM
#63
Posted 02 March 2008 - 05:09 AM
The private issue got solved by a mass demotion. There's not that many people in private now. I'm not sure whether it's a good or a bad thing to have separate ranks within a rank like private. Can you explain a little more about what it would involve? Like is it hierarchical or just like groups on the same level?
Begain this post with : No I can't and nor can I be bothered to.
And then I realised well actually, I can be bothered.
The private issue being solved by mass demotion was pure idioticness. Honestly I wonder what goes through Patrick's head sometimes. You demote people who actually earnt that rank once upon a time. So what if they become inactive after a while- what happens if they come back? They have to apply again??? Dear God; lame attitude
#64
Posted 02 March 2008 - 05:55 AM
The private issue got solved by a mass demotion. There's not that many people in private now. I'm not sure whether it's a good or a bad thing to have separate ranks within a rank like private. Can you explain a little more about what it would involve? Like is it hierarchical or just like groups on the same level?
Amen this is exactly what i'm talking about.
You need to earn things yes.
But if u want to actual make it in 1 week orso you'd have to post like ...71 posts a day which is near to impossible,..
Ok 1 week is a bit less but still even for 1 month it;'s 17 posts which is still quite alot which results in spam gravedigging etc etc
#65
Posted 02 March 2008 - 06:20 AM
#66
Posted 02 March 2008 - 05:29 PM
#67
Posted 02 March 2008 - 05:29 PM
#68
Posted 04 March 2008 - 11:07 PM
* <---- * *cough*
#69
Posted 05 March 2008 - 04:44 AM
The intermediate member could possibly make those leechers/newbies strive for something and feel wanted?!
#70
Posted 05 March 2008 - 05:53 AM
#71
Posted 05 March 2008 - 06:35 AM
The intermediate member could possibly make those leechers/newbies strive for something and feel wanted?!
Exactly! I have something to strive for! 500 posts is alot to get before a rank up
#72
Posted 05 March 2008 - 06:50 AM
Now where is my cookie?
#73
Posted 05 March 2008 - 06:54 AM
Now where is my cookie?
You're too late. Kitsune ate it.
#74
Posted 05 March 2008 - 12:35 PM
#75
Posted 05 March 2008 - 12:53 PM
I suffered from this, no private for me
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users


This topic is locked
