The Neocodex E-Zine: Issue #4
#76 Guest_Ali_*
Posted 04 September 2008 - 05:39 PM
DISCUSS THE EZINE:
I don't really read it very thoroughly because there's not really anything of interest in it for me. I don't use programs, I know what is and isn't tolerated on Codex and I'm not really particularly interested in other people's reviews of films. I missed Michie's member spotlight feature.
#77
Posted 04 September 2008 - 05:41 PM
Thanks to everyone that explained, my mind partially shuts down after 1am or so, blame Ali for my still being awake .
Anyway censorship was carried out because the flaw your post contained upset a member it was aimed at and they acted as members should when that's the case, your pointing out of the flaw was deemed unnecessary so it was removed, though I will admit both myself and Alex were very unsure about what to do with it because the flaw pointed out was done so in a manner we considered rather mild. In saying that though, we used our amazing intuitive techniques to predict that taking this course of action would lead to less repercussions.
Though I may just have messed that up because I'm not going to remove your other post as requested as it was vague and most certainly not worth it. However, to maintain that level of vague-ness, I request this be taken to PM if you wish to discuss it futher, that goes to anyone involved.
No need to talk to you in a patronizing manner. You'll get one eventually, have no fear.
Oh boo hoo. A particular member got all wound up about something like that? What a baby.
Last time I was vague a particular staff member got sand in his vagina. Why are you so different?
#78
Posted 04 September 2008 - 05:42 PM
I know what i'm entitled to post, doesn't mean because i followed the rules people wont bitch. And since people love making 'lil digs at me these days i figured it'd be like some kinda pay day for them.
#79
Posted 04 September 2008 - 05:44 PM
DISCUSS THE EZINE:
I don't really read it very thoroughly because there's not really anything of interest in it for me. I don't use programs, I know what is and isn't tolerated on Codex and I'm not really particularly interested in other people's reviews of films. I missed Michie's member spotlight feature.
Oh we're giving in? This makes me sad.
Mmk. My talking about the ezine then:
It was enjoyable, I read about half of Ash's thing of LPC and got to know bits about it's starting off that I didn't already know, I'd already read Tyler's what's not tolerated on codex article (oh the perks of being mod) so I didn't read that again but it was easy to read when I did and I'm sure remained as such. I also read Tyler's other article and I thought the collection of SotW's was lovely, especially that 'Aether' one, whoever did that was a genious.
However I would have to say that mostly it wasn't really my thing, like Ali I'm not very interested in programs (though as I've said in ezine chat I certainly know where to go if I ever do want to know about programs, Oaken seems to have done a damned good job on his articles.) I scrolled down the film titles and as none of the films particularly interested me anyway I chose not to read the review I'm afraid, which is nothing against the quality of the article, simply personal preference.
I was also uspet to see absolutely no mention of my resign, my avid fans will be left wondering what's happened to me and god forbid the people that hate me think I've died or something and stop bitching .
#80
Posted 04 September 2008 - 05:44 PM
If people love to do that, you might wanna fix the reason why.
Just saying
D'awww, Michie read both of my articles?
Edited by Tyler., 04 September 2008 - 05:46 PM.
#81
Posted 04 September 2008 - 05:45 PM
You're right. I'm out to get you!
^What he said.
#82
Posted 04 September 2008 - 05:45 PM
Fair enough. Completely up to you. We're talking about the ezine now anyway.
Edit: Curse you Hawk and Tyler, messing up my merge!
#83 Guest_Ali_*
Posted 04 September 2008 - 05:46 PM
Oh boo hoo. A particular member got all wound up about something like that? What a baby.
Last time I was vague a particular staff member got sand in his vagina. Why are you so different?
STOP NOT DISCUSSING THE E-ZINE.
I've just checked what else was in the e-zine. I know how Codex is funded, I've witnessed a lot of the LPC stuff and don't really care about it and I know who wins SOTWs because I see the topics. I think if you keep up with current events on Codex, quite a lot of the e-zine becomes hugely irrelevant. Maybe that's just to me though. *Shrugs* Still, good work guys!
#84
Posted 04 September 2008 - 05:46 PM
I was surprised at that as well to be honest . I thought Alex might have included something at the start in his little intro to the E-Zine.
#85 Guest_Ali_*
Posted 04 September 2008 - 05:47 PM
This. Also devastated I'll now never be interviewed by Michie. Basically all I'm still at Codex for.
#86
Posted 04 September 2008 - 05:48 PM
You're not here to take shit from LW? Or me?
#87 Guest_Ali_*
Posted 04 September 2008 - 05:49 PM
You'll never know now that I'll never have a member spotlight courtesy of Michie.
#88
Posted 04 September 2008 - 05:50 PM
Oh boo hoo. A particular member got all wound up about something like that? What a baby.
Last time I was vague a particular staff member got sand in his vagina. Why are you so different?
Didn't even see this o-o.
Awwh but I was hoping to get one whilst it was all jokes, I don't want the sting of a real one!
You're entitled to believe that as much as the particular member is entitled to be wound up about it. One person's baby is another one's reasonably upset man/woman .
I don't know why I'm so different but I certainly hope it's not in a bad way . However, saying that, I've already said once if you wanted to continue vague discussion to do it via PM, and while I realise that half of the appeal to this discussion for you is probably the very fact that it's public, it can't continue, to save the report inbox from being raped if nothing else . Anything else on the matter and I shall have to invisie . Consistancy and carrying out threats and all that .
#89
Posted 04 September 2008 - 05:52 PM
Damn it Michie. First you fuck up my first post in this thread, then you quit spotlighting members. What the fuck.
Awwh but I was hoping to get one whilst it was all jokes, I don't want the sting of a real one!
You're entitled to believe that as much as the particular member is entitled to be wound up about it. One person's baby is another one's reasonably upset man/woman .
I don't know why I'm so different but I certainly hope it's not in a bad way . However, saying that, I've already said once if you wanted to continue vague discussion to do it via PM, and while I realise that half of the appeal to this discussion for you is probably the very fact that it's public, it can't continue, to save the report inbox from being raped if nothing else . Anything else on the matter and I shall have to invisie . Consistancy and carrying out threats and all that .
So you have to remove it, yet it is quoted? Good work.
Oh, and it isn't in a bad way.
#90
Posted 04 September 2008 - 05:53 PM
There uh *cough* was always something in the intro mentioning that! I don't know what you guys are talking about. It's right at the bottom of the editor's note!
#91
Posted 04 September 2008 - 05:54 PM
I've just checked what else was in the e-zine. I know how Codex is funded, I've witnessed a lot of the LPC stuff and don't really care about it and I know who wins SOTWs because I see the topics. I think if you keep up with current events on Codex, quite a lot of the e-zine becomes hugely irrelevant. Maybe that's just to me though. *Shrugs* Still, good work guys!
Thank you for checking for me Ali, I realised I'd read another article by Tyler but I was rather embarrassed because I couldn't remember what it was! Just too much good material in that ezine, can't keep it all in my head! Anyway, upon reading Tyler's article I thought to myself how it was good, I hadn't appreciated that the adverts gained codex so much money and I liked the writing device he used when he said one set of adverts got $65 every three months and one set got $20 every month, which we all know basically adds up to the same thing, but it keeps it interesting from a literary perspective! Imagine . I was also surprised at his suggestion that Hydrogen might keep some pocket money, I thought to myself about the controversy that might have started I did! But then I realised Tyler is one to stray onto the dark side of ezine-articles, did you catch the one last issue? Slagging off other Neopet cheating sites? Oooh the cheek! Does make me giggle I say. However, shant talk about it anymore, that's off-topic, this is issue #4 afterall, not #3.
I was relying on it so I could claim an extra mention and get the carriage clock, no avail .
Don't worry, Alex has made me promise to throw a few in, make sure you do something worthwhile one month and I'll interview you .
xD
So you have to remove it, yet it is quoted? Good work.
Oh, and it isn't in a bad way.
Oh I'm not removing that one, just any future ones, this one is unrelated though so it can stay. I'm not that daft Hawk!
#92
Posted 04 September 2008 - 05:56 PM
Hell, even I couldn't remember what both of my articles were about
#93
Posted 04 September 2008 - 05:57 PM
#94
Posted 04 September 2008 - 05:58 PM
#95
Posted 04 September 2008 - 06:00 PM
Maybe I needed a joke to make my article slightly funny?!
Edited by Tyler., 04 September 2008 - 06:00 PM.
#96
Posted 04 September 2008 - 06:00 PM
Oh I know . It's actually why I thought 'heck!' at the suggestion because while I'm sure Tyler intended it as a joke anyway, some people might take it literally and be all 'wth!?' and drama would ensue. However the drama in this topic appears to be completely unrelated, how wrong was I?
#97 Guest_Ali_*
Posted 04 September 2008 - 06:01 PM
You tell such horrible liez.
I was relying on it so I could claim an extra mention and get the carriage clock, no avail .
Don't worry, Alex has made me promise to throw a few in, make sure you do something worthwhile one month and I'll interview you .
Oh gosh, see, I missed such an excellent writing device by only skimreading the article as it was something I already knew about it. What a shame. Well done Tyler. *Nods* Oh, I know Michie, I just can't think of such controversy, it makes me feel all panicky inside! Tyler is fairly sly isn't he? I can't say I remember the last issue, I may have missed it.
...Are you suggesting that everything I do isn't worthwhile? I generate activity, I'm ex-longterm-staff, I'm grumpy to make the rest of you seem cheerier...I'm a godsend to this place.
#98
Posted 04 September 2008 - 06:01 PM
You were just the only one that actually read it, I'm sure
#99
Posted 04 September 2008 - 06:02 PM
PM me one reason why I should stop and I'll consider it... until then... someone has sand in his or her vagina.
#100
Posted 04 September 2008 - 06:03 PM
I didn't see it first time. Your part is too small.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users