will drinking soy milk
#26
Posted 21 January 2010 - 10:41 PM
#27
Posted 22 January 2010 - 12:50 AM
yeah, I've read articles that say that humans shouldn't drink cow's milk at all. It's for baby COWS, not humans. If we want milk that's good for us, we should drink human breast milk.
I support this... find me a breast and I shall suckle.
#28
Posted 22 January 2010 - 01:06 AM
yeah, I've read articles that say that humans shouldn't drink cow's milk at all. It's for baby COWS, not humans. If we want milk that's good for us, we should drink human breast milk.
My friend's dad said it tastes pretty wierd.
#29
Posted 22 January 2010 - 08:02 AM
Oh and y'all know most baby formulas are soy based not cow milk based right?
on my soy milk it says "Not to be used as infant formula"
#30
Posted 22 January 2010 - 11:17 AM
But we do that to cows
Although cows aren't the same as humans... heh
#31
Posted 22 January 2010 - 11:23 AM
on my soy milk it says "Not to be used as infant formula"
Well yeah but look at the powdered and canned formulas
#32
Posted 22 January 2010 - 01:51 PM
#33
Posted 22 January 2010 - 01:55 PM
prolonged drinking of breast milk leads to higher IQ
Dammit! Why has no one offered me a teet to suckle yet?!? I have yet to see a down-side (for me).
#34
Posted 23 January 2010 - 02:12 PM
#35
Posted 23 January 2010 - 02:16 PM
prolonged drinking of breast milk leads to higher IQ
Statistics fail
There has never been, and likely will never be, a well designed experiment on the subject. You can stage an observational study, and that can lead to the conclusion that drinking breast milk and high IQ's are correlated. However, correlation does not imply causation, causation can only be determined by a well designed controlled experiment.
Saying that drinking breast milk leads to higher IQ is completely ignoring the very real possibility of confounding factors.
Edited by Darkmagi310, 23 January 2010 - 02:20 PM.
#36
Posted 23 January 2010 - 03:00 PM
http://www.cbc.ca/health/story/2008/05/06/cdn-study-breastfeeding.html"Hillary Swank, get your milk from her!"
Statistics fail
There has never been, and likely will never be, a well designed experiment on the subject. You can stage an observational study, and that can lead to the conclusion that drinking breast milk and high IQ's are correlated. However, correlation does not imply causation, causation can only be determined by a well designed controlled experiment.
Saying that drinking breast milk leads to higher IQ is completely ignoring the very real possibility of confounding factors.
you're right it's still not 100% linked but in context milk has everything you need to improve your cognitive ability. the study was a pretty large one too. although the results on average wasn't that significant (only 3-4 points on average) it's still a difference.
#37
Posted 24 January 2010 - 06:05 PM
http://www.cbc.ca/health/story/2008/05/06/cdn-study-breastfeeding.html
you're right it's still not 100% linked but in context milk has everything you need to improve your cognitive ability. the study was a pretty large one too. although the results on average wasn't that significant (only 3-4 points on average) it's still a difference.
3 - 4 points on a test with a standard deviation of 15 is statistically insignificant.
#38
Posted 24 January 2010 - 08:03 PM
3 - 4 points on a test with a standard deviation of 15 is statistically insignificant.
Lol.... your graph looks like breasts
#39
Posted 24 January 2010 - 08:12 PM
Lol.... your graph looks like breasts
They do now that you've mentioned it.
#40
Posted 24 January 2010 - 08:31 PM
#41
Posted 24 January 2010 - 08:33 PM
That looks like statistically significant data right there. I want to give a grant to the researcher who is working on this topic.
#42
Posted 24 January 2010 - 08:38 PM
That is so funny. How long did it take you to do that?
#43
Posted 24 January 2010 - 08:41 PM
A minute or two.That is so funny. How long did it take you to do that?
Edited by Andy, 25 January 2010 - 04:04 AM.
#44
Posted 25 January 2010 - 08:28 AM
3 - 4 points on a test with a standard deviation of 15 is statistically insignificant.
#45
Posted 25 January 2010 - 10:05 AM
#46
Posted 25 January 2010 - 01:02 PM
Ugh, stop reading into my posts too much.3-4 points of IQ is not the same as 3-4 points on a test I'm not completely sure but I'm guessing the average IQ is around 100 then the highest amount is typically 140 so the difference between 100 and 104 is a 3% change. I don't know how significant this is in IQ. The IQ of a dog compared to humans is that of around a 2 year old child or 30 which leads me to believe that a 3% IQ change is fairly significant. But then again, I don't know how great the difference between 1 IQ is to another. Like pH scale, 3 points in difference is extremely significant. The study also hypothesized that there would be continual growth in the children's intelligence throughout the years. Though, that test hasn't been don yet
...
I dunno, maybe because some women won't exactly warm to the idea of either breastfeeding a 3 year old, or getting milked...regardless of whether it's that big of a difference or not, just by simply adding breastmilk has long term effects for IQ, why the heck not just drink it? Better than nothing.
Edited by Andy, 25 January 2010 - 01:08 PM.
#47
Posted 25 January 2010 - 01:54 PM
I dunno, maybe because some women won't exactly warm to the idea getting milked...
They'd like it if I did it :3
#48
Posted 25 January 2010 - 04:37 PM
#49
Posted 25 January 2010 - 04:58 PM
#50
Posted 27 February 2010 - 12:54 AM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users


