Lol. TNT. Your so funny.
I havent Abed at all in 2010... GG.
maybe the picture you shown last time? or any info given out here..That sucks..
Posted 29 April 2010 - 02:41 PM
Lol. TNT. Your so funny.
I havent Abed at all in 2010... GG.
Posted 29 April 2010 - 02:49 PM
Posted 29 April 2010 - 02:52 PM
Lol. TNT. Your so funny.
I havent Abed at all in 2010... GG.
Posted 29 April 2010 - 06:41 PM
Posted 29 April 2010 - 06:45 PM
Frozen again.
Posted 29 April 2010 - 06:51 PM
TNT have not stop their freezing spree? I thought i'm safe already
Posted 29 April 2010 - 06:52 PM
I don't think it's the former, I changed my IP, e-mail, password, etc like I said in my post. I thought my OCR times we're a little quick, but I borrowed them from someone who's been using them for quite a while. Could be a combination of times and my account age.You seem to either be targeted, or your OCR times are too quick.
I would consider increasing the OCR times and giving the Abrosia a rest and focusing on just the NPGen until the heat dies down and your new account reaches a month or so.
Posted 29 April 2010 - 08:03 PM
I don't think it's the former, I changed my IP, e-mail, password, etc like I said in my post. I thought my OCR times we're a little quick, but I borrowed them from someone who's been using them for quite a while. Could be a combination of times and my account age.
I might just make like ten emails and ten accounts, changing my IP between making them, then let them age. -_-
Posted 29 April 2010 - 08:15 PM
Posted 30 April 2010 - 01:26 AM
Edited by Jonni, 30 April 2010 - 01:28 AM.
Posted 30 April 2010 - 06:47 AM
Posted 01 May 2010 - 08:37 PM
Posted 06 May 2010 - 07:56 AM
No. The point of this topic is to see if there is anything detected in Abrosia. We have been around since fucking 2006. I think we know what we are doing by now. Please. Shut up already.
Posted 06 May 2010 - 08:30 AM
Tsunade, did you get frozen, make a new account without changing your IP, then get frozen again?
Was the 5 hours all at once?
Posted 06 May 2010 - 11:05 AM
Two errors in this reply.
First off - why did you use 'we'? Since when have you been given any authority to call decisions on what's best for the site and talk on behalf of this site - never as I can recall. I still think you're a stuck up little shit and should get off your god damn high-horse. You are nothing but a slave (read: programmer) to this site and once they are done with you you shall be chucked out just like some of us were.
Also - NeoCodex has been around since 2004 and only us the older members would know that
Posted 06 May 2010 - 12:43 PM
Two errors in this reply.
First off - why did you use 'we'? Since when have you been given any authority to call decisions on what's best for the site and talk on behalf of this site - never as I can recall. I still think you're a stuck up little shit and should get off your god damn high-horse. You are nothing but a slave (read: programmer) to this site and once they are done with you you shall be chucked out just like some of us were.
Also - NeoCodex has been around since 2004 and only us the older members would know that
Posted 06 May 2010 - 12:47 PM
lolwutA community is part of the word we
Posted 06 May 2010 - 12:53 PM
lolwut
plural pronoun, possessive our or ours, objective us.
1.
nominative pl. of I.
2.
(used to denote oneself and another or others): We have two children. In this block we all own our own houses.
3.
(used to denote people in general): the marvels of science that we take for granted.
4.
(used to indicate a particular profession, nationality, political party, etc., that includes the speaker or writer): We in the Medical profession have moral responsibilities.
5.
Also called the royal we. (used by a sovereign, or by other high officials and dignitaries, in place of I in formal speech): We do not wear this crown without humility.
6.
Also called the editorial we. (used by editors, writers, etc., to avoid the too personal or specific I or to represent a collective viewpoint): As for this column, we will have nothing to do with shady politicians.
7.
you (used familiarly, often with mild condescension or sarcasm, as in addressing a child, a patient, etc.): We know that's naughty, don't we? It's time we took our medicine.
8.
(used in the predicate following a copulative verb): It is we who should thank you.
9.
(used in apposition with a noun, esp. for emphasis): We Americans are a sturdy lot.
com·mu·ni·ty [kuh-myoo-ni-tee] Show IPA
–noun, plural -ties.
1.
a social group of any size whose members reside in a specific locality, share government, and often have a common cultural and historical heritage.
2.
a locality inhabited by such a group.
3.
a social, religious, occupational, or other group sharing common characteristics or interests and perceived or perceiving itself as distinct in some respect from the larger society within which it exists (usually prec. by the ): the business community; the community of scholars.
4.
a group of associated nations sharing common interests or a common heritage: the community of Western Europe.
5.
Ecclesiastical . a group of men or women leading a common life according to a rule.
6.
Ecology . an assemblage of interacting populations occupying a given area.
7.
joint possession, enjoyment, liability, etc.: community of property.
8.
similar character; agreement; identity: community of interests.
9.
the community, the public; society: the needs of the community.
Posted 06 May 2010 - 12:54 PM
Posted 06 May 2010 - 12:57 PM
That's very nice. It still doesn't make "community a part of the word we".
"We" has only two parts. A W and an e.
Posted 06 May 2010 - 12:57 PM
Let me oversimplify it for you.
The word we can thus be used to denote a community.
That's very nice. It still doesn't make "community a part of the word we".
"We" has only two parts. A W and an e.
Posted 06 May 2010 - 01:02 PM
Or, in fact, those with at least a semi-decent grasp of the English language.Only to the simple minded it would seem.
Posted 06 May 2010 - 01:09 PM
Or, in fact, those with at least a semi-decent grasp of the English language.
I believe what you intended to say was that "We is a perfectly valid pronoun to use in reference to a community, given its inherently plural and inclusive nature"?
Posted 06 May 2010 - 01:12 PM
I could say that "Rabbits are small mammals in the family Leporidae of the order Lagomorpha, found in several parts of the world." in fewer words too.Sure. I could use that many words to say it, but apparently in using less words, you're still confused. Doesn't make things any easier on you, does it?
Posted 06 May 2010 - 01:17 PM
I could say that "Rabbits are small mammals in the family Leporidae of the order Lagomorpha, found in several parts of the world." in fewer words too.
Of course, if the analogy was to be accurate, those few words would have to be "Rabbits are part of the word world".
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users