Quantcast

What works and what is paused · Email is limited to account activation and password resets.

Jump to content


Photo

Why won't TNT set out an official warning about CG'ers?


  • Please log in to reply
42 replies to this topic

#26 kadoatie

kadoatie
  • 284 posts

Posted 15 August 2010 - 07:27 PM

TNT is a big corporation that gears more towards "children" and if they admitted that there are available methods of obtaining access to different accounts, all the soccer moms would run amok because they refuse to accept that even Neopets has flaws.

Advertisement

    #27 Guest_jcrgirl_*

    Guest_jcrgirl_*

    Posted 15 August 2010 - 07:31 PM

    I don't mind getting rid of HTML in shops/galleries
    but userlookups? I like customizing those :/

    petpages too.... and pet lookups. totally unfair :(

    #28 Boggart

    Boggart
    • Professional Napper

    • 7981 posts


    Users Awards

    Posted 15 August 2010 - 07:44 PM

    But it's for teh shafety of der NEOPETS!

    #29 dfoaiu

    dfoaiu
    • 72 posts

    Posted 16 August 2010 - 12:24 AM

    Getting rid of coding in the shops would be great. I hate those huge images that people put up to advertise.

    #30 Abigail

    Abigail
    • 329 posts

    Posted 16 August 2010 - 06:26 AM

    Because they're lazy?
    Ugh, I just wish they would just stop user-edited parts of the site all together or have a premade petpage...
    They're not that important anyways.

    #31 xToxic

    xToxic
    • 349 posts

    Posted 16 August 2010 - 01:24 PM

    Having premade sections (not unlike the guild layouts with their "upload your guild logo" and changing the colours of the tables) wouldn't be a bad idea. Gives you a little bit of customisation but not enough (hypothetically) for a full blown CG attack.

    #32 Boggart

    Boggart
    • Professional Napper

    • 7981 posts


    Users Awards

    Posted 16 August 2010 - 09:40 PM

    I think TNT has started getting rid of a bit of userlook ups, one said that "it was deemed innapropriate and removed" but you'd think if it had a CG that it would be frozen :p

    #33 Brennon

    Brennon
    • 938 posts


    Users Awards

    Posted 17 August 2010 - 01:30 AM

    I pray to God/Yahweh/Allah that this event gets rid of user html in shops and lookups once and for all.


    God/Yahweh
    Same Thing.

    Because they're lazy?
    Ugh, I just wish they would just stop user-edited parts of the site all together or have a premade petpage...
    They're not that important anyways.


    I think they are heading in that direction with getting rid of the user lookup and petpage spotlights

    #34 Lineage

    Lineage
    • 498 posts

    Posted 17 August 2010 - 04:38 AM

    I pray to God/Yahweh/Allah that this event gets rid of user html in shops and lookups once and for all.


    Seriously thissss, it defeats the purpose of being able to SSW because now, using SSW is essentially setting yourself up for failure x__x

    However. Anyone who owns/takes part in malling would be in an UPROAR however because that's how they make money.
    People click on the images in their shop to get to other peoples shops and whatever.


    ..
    I don't mall though so I could carealess if they made it so you cannot edit your shop :whistling:

    Edited by Lineage, 17 August 2010 - 04:38 AM.


    #35 xToxic

    xToxic
    • 349 posts

    Posted 17 August 2010 - 05:31 AM

    I SSW but pick about the 3rd up the list. And if a link looks suspicious, disable all scripts on the page and go on it then. Or check the account in a browser I don't use Neopets for.

    I saw an item for about 900np the other day that sells for 15k. I avoided it like the plague.

    #36 Abigail

    Abigail
    • 329 posts

    Posted 17 August 2010 - 05:44 AM

    Oh is that why they got rid of the site spotlights?

    #37 munie

    munie
    • 93 posts

    Posted 17 August 2010 - 06:59 AM

    This is TNT we are talking about.. do you seriously expect them to do something right?

    #38 InsertRandomNameHere

    InsertRandomNameHere
    • 340 posts

    Posted 17 August 2010 - 07:07 AM

    This is TNT we are talking about.. do you seriously expect them to do something right?



    Haha you remind me of the advertisement on Neopets!
    There was once someone took a screenshot of an obscene advertisement on Neopets.
    It was an advertisement on Neopets about Penis Size Enhancement, make your penis longer, etc LOL!

    #39 Abrar

    Abrar
    • 157 posts

    Posted 17 August 2010 - 09:19 AM

    Haha you remind me of the advertisement on Neopets!
    There was once someone took a screenshot of an obscene advertisement on Neopets.
    It was an advertisement on Neopets about Penis Size Enhancement, make your penis longer, etc LOL!


    And yet they brand themselves as a kids only site :|
    Kids barely even play it though...compared to us teenagers and adults.

    #40 Boggart

    Boggart
    • Professional Napper

    • 7981 posts


    Users Awards

    Posted 17 August 2010 - 12:16 PM

    Only because kids only follow the latest rage, and neopets is definitely not the latest rage xD

    #41 supermnstr

    supermnstr
    • 25 posts

    Posted 18 August 2010 - 02:01 PM

    What is CGing?

    #42 Code

    Code
    • Patron of Absorbia

    • 435 posts

    Posted 19 August 2010 - 05:08 AM

    I was wondering, if they got rid of html, would people quit?

    I know the fact that when neopets got a 'new look' before, like changing all the sidebars and etc, there were massive people who disliked the new layout, etc....
    If they got rid of petpages, html and stuff, would those people that has like big graphic sites like.. futago, css graphics, would those people quit?
    How about guilds? Guilds need their webbie for sure.. without them would people still join guilds..? o-o

    Like... yeah... :p

    #43 Faval

    Faval
    • 637 posts

    Posted 19 August 2010 - 05:34 AM

    They don't have to disable Html and CSS, they can just limit their javascript library :p


    1 user(s) are reading this topic

    0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users