but it still worth the trouble isn't it?
i bet there's no regret in it though sometimes they can make you damn pissed off.
Yeah ofcourse
Anyway, were going off topic a bit
What works and what is paused · Email is limited to account activation and password resets.
Posted 04 September 2010 - 04:57 AM
but it still worth the trouble isn't it?
i bet there's no regret in it though sometimes they can make you damn pissed off.
Posted 04 September 2010 - 08:06 AM
Posted 04 September 2010 - 08:28 AM
Edited by Trichomes, 16 March 2011 - 06:02 AM.
Posted 04 September 2010 - 09:21 AM
It is not always a woman’s irresponsibility that leads to an unwanted pregnancy. Most women do not feel as if abortion is a form of contraception, and only 8% of women who have had an abortion were not using any form of birth control at the time of conception. In some cases, unwanted pregnancy is forced by rape or incest. In these cases, there may be psychological harm to the victim, and she may be too afraid to seek help. Since the morning-after pill is only effective when used within three days of intercourse, abortion may be the only option for women who are traumatized and in no emotional state to raise a child.
Posted 04 September 2010 - 09:53 AM
Edited by Trichomes, 04 September 2010 - 09:56 AM.
Posted 04 September 2010 - 11:56 AM
Posted 04 September 2010 - 12:04 PM
Posted 04 September 2010 - 12:23 PM
Posted 04 September 2010 - 12:35 PM
Posted 04 September 2010 - 12:50 PM
I think abortion is perfectly fine.. Saying that some dumbass who can't keep her legs shut isn't abusing the system and just keeps continually having abortions instead of say, using some form of birth control anyway.
Having a kid is going to affect you the rest of your life, whether you want it to or not. I plan on going places with my life and with working full-time, going to school full-time, and owning two dogs and two cats, my life would go to shambles if a baby got thrown into the loop. Can't afford it, don't have the time to care for it nor could I really make the time to care for it because I'm working the absolute minimum I can already in order to keep on top of college and being able to pay our mortgage.
I would much rather see someone have their baby aborted than drop out of highschool/college and essentially end up not going anywhere with their life.
Posted 04 September 2010 - 01:13 PM
I would much rather people use a cheap and effective form of contraception and not have this problem.
I mean... are we really so lazy of humans now that we can't forgo a little increased stimulation to save the emotional, monetary, and moral consequences that come from abortion? I just don't understand how in the past when we were nomadic that we had no problem maintaining population size... and the only birth control then was abstinence/coitus interupptus... I guess when your community is so small that you are held to your actions more closely. It just makes me truly saddened for humanity when we can't throw out a little more pleasure to effectively eliminate risks of pregnancy. It's just beyond me.
Posted 04 September 2010 - 01:21 PM
But what if your contraceptives fail? Even if you are using a condom AND your partner is on birth control, and maybe even a third method is used, there is a very small chance that she could still get that pregnant. In that case, are you willing to bring an unwanted child into the world? Even if you chose adoption, she would still have to go through the discomfort and pain of pregnancy and labor. I mean, even if you were obviously doing everything possible to prevent pregnancy from occurring, and I would consider that pretty responsible, it could still happen. Some people just aren't ready to handle that huge responsibility.
I also think population control in the past had a lot to do with the much higher infant mortality rate.
Posted 04 September 2010 - 01:21 PM
But what if your contraceptives fail? Even if you are using a condom AND your partner is on birth control, and maybe even a third method is used, there is a very small chance that she could still get that pregnant. In that case, are you willing to bring an unwanted child into the world? Even if you chose adoption, she would still have to go through the discomfort and pain of pregnancy and labor. I mean, even if you were obviously doing everything possible to prevent pregnancy from occurring, and I would consider that pretty responsible, it could still happen. Some people just aren't ready to handle that huge responsibility.
I also think population control in the past had a lot to do with the much higher infant mortality rate.
Posted 04 September 2010 - 01:32 PM
Posted 04 September 2010 - 02:10 PM
This. I'm 21, in a far more financially stable situation than anyone else of my age that I know, more than capable of supporting a child but it just wouldn't be an option for me. Mine and my husband's careers just won't allow us to raise a child while we both work and I'd rather have an abortion than raise a miserable child whose parents don't have enough time for it.A person of any age could find themselves in this situation, and it doesn't necessarily have to be about financial difficulty either.
Posted 04 September 2010 - 02:39 PM
I never said anything about high school or college. A person of any age could find themselves in this situation, and it doesn't necessarily have to be about financial difficulty either.
I don't believe things are "meant to happen," so I'm not sure I'd be so quick to dismiss abortion as a possibility if I was doing everything I possibly could not to get pregnant. You can't just expect people not to have sex, responsibly, if they don't want to be parents. That's just unfair.
Posted 04 September 2010 - 03:05 PM
Ultimately, if you don't want to get hit by a car, don't walk outside.Unfair? I don't mean to be cliche but life is unfair! Ultimately if you do not want to have children and are scared that you will have children despite taking precautions, than don't have sex. That's not unfair, it's logical.
Posted 04 September 2010 - 03:18 PM
No, that's not what I am saying, nor what he is saying.I don't think that's reductio ad absurdum... It's like if you don't wanna get hit my a car... look both ways when you cross the street, wear a helmet if you're on a bike, be aware of your surroundings, drive defensively. Abortion in your simile would be walk willy nilly wherever you want and if you do get hit by a car, just have the car demolished and go to the hospital.
There shouldn't be a need to go to the hospital because you shouldn't have been playing in the street without protection anyways.
Posted 04 September 2010 - 03:26 PM
Condoms are what...98% effective when used perfectly in clinical trials? The statistics for typical use are far far lower but even at best that's still a 2% failure rate. Hormonal contraception is generally far more successful but still, not perfect and there are a large number of women for whom it just isn't suitable.I don't think that's reductio ad absurdum... It's like if you don't wanna get hit my a car... look both ways when you cross the street, wear a helmet if you're on a bike, be aware of your surroundings, drive defensively. Abortion in your simile would be walk willy nilly wherever you want and if you do get hit by a car, just have the car demolished and go to the hospital.
There shouldn't be a need to go to the hospital because you shouldn't have been playing in the street without protection anyways.
Posted 04 September 2010 - 03:31 PM
Still going to get someone...And what about all the people who don't have birth control as an option?oh of course! But if you couple condoms with birth control you are really, really reducing the risks.
Posted 04 September 2010 - 03:34 PM
Sorry, Cody, but that's not what he/she/it said.As I stated before in cases of rape then there should be the option for them or if the woman has serious health concerns, in any other case there shouldn't even be an option.
Posted 04 September 2010 - 03:39 PM
Fine.that was her agreeing that abortion should exist under x context. The other circumstances in which it shouldn't be permitted would fall into that moral variability range.
Posted 04 September 2010 - 03:50 PM
Other what?LOL. perhaps not... but the argument is that "You must not kill others, even if they haven't been born yet"... and not killing people would fall under morality.
Posted 04 September 2010 - 03:58 PM
That doesn't make sense.LOL! you're hilarious. It really all just varies dependent upon when the fetus becomes "alive." By my definition, everything is alive... except maybe dark matter... but that's another story entirely. So for my abortion level when does life start, I guess I think that once there is a beating heart, it constitutes as alive to me.
Posted 04 September 2010 - 04:01 PM
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users