215 replies to this topic

[iargue]

That doesn't mean that homosexuals and bisexuals should be marginalized.

Evolution excludes gays, stop complaining.

[Trichomes]

As another bisexual female, I think you're being completely irrational, Mishelle. Clearly vaginas exist for the purpose of procreation, which does require heterosexual vaginal intercourse. Nature did not intend for artificial insemination, so comparing a vagina to a lock and a penis to a key is perfectly logical and unbiased. It's selfish to assume that the analogy is homophobic. Of course not all women are attracted to men, and therefore do not want to engage in vaginal penetration by a penis. However, that is why your vagina is there.

[Mishelle]

Evolution excludes gays, stop complaining.

Yeah that's why centuries of straight coupling has only produced straight babies. When are you going to stop being an idiot?

As another bisexual female, I think you're being completely irrational, Mishelle. Clearly vaginas exist for the purpose of procreation, which does require heterosexual vaginal intercourse. Nature did not intend for artificial insemination, so comparing a vagina to a lock and a penis to a key is perfectly logical and unbiased. It's selfish to assume that the analogy is homophobic. Of course not all women are attracted to men, and therefore do not want to engage in vaginal penetration by a penis. However, that is why your vagina is there.

What does procreation have to do with institutionalized slut-shaming. It occurs in both the hetero and lqbtq community...

Edited by Mishelle, 02 November 2010 - 01:53 PM.

[iargue]

Heterocentric is defined as the bias that heterosexual is normal and homosexual is not normal. Heterocentric ideals such as "lock and key" promotes the idea that everyone is presumed heterosexual until stated otherwise. When talking about sex I don't see a huge problem with acknowledging the fact that homosexuals and bisexuals exist. Slut-shaming doesn't just occur in the heterosexual community.

Heterosexuals can reproduce naturally.
Homosexuals cannot reproduce naturally.

Which one is logically, "normal".

And you started this from no were, which just pissed me off. No one exlucded Homosexuals. We were talking about sluts, and why a girl sleeping with everyone is bad, but not a guy. We were not talking about homosexuals because we are afraid of them. We excluded them because they were not in the topic.

[Trichomes]

Yeah that's why centuries of straight coupling has only produced straight babies. When are you going to stop being an idiot?


What does procreation have to do with institutionalized slut-shaming. It occurs in both the hetero and lqbtq community...

You were the one who strayed off topic in the first place...

Heterosexuals can reproduce naturally.
Homosexuals cannot reproduce naturally.

Which one is logically, "normal".

And you started this from no were, which just pissed me off. No one exlucded Homosexuals. We were talking about sluts, and why a girl sleeping with everyone is bad, but not a guy. We were not talking about homosexuals because we are afraid of them. We excluded them because they were not in the topic.

I actually agree with you. Just because someone is scientifically abnormal, it doesn't make them a lesser person. I see nothing wrong with considering heterosexuality the norm.

Edited by Trichomes, 02 November 2010 - 01:59 PM.

[iargue]

Yeah that's why centuries of straight coupling has only produced straight babies. When are you going to stop being an idiot?

Lol

http://en.wikipedia....tural_selection

[Mishelle]

Heterosexuals can reproduce naturally.
Homosexuals cannot reproduce naturally.

Which one is logically, "normal".

And you started this from no were, which just pissed me off. No one exlucded Homosexuals. We were talking about sluts, and why a girl sleeping with everyone is bad, but not a guy. We were not talking about homosexuals because we are afraid of them. We excluded them because they were not in the topic.

Just because they can't reproduce doesn't exclude them from evolution since despite heterosexual procreation they continue to exist.

I stated that that concept was both misogynistic and homophobic. My wording was wrong, I should've said heterocentric. I was asked to elaborate on the topic don't pitch a bitch fit just because someone asked my opinion. And like I said, slut shaming occurs in both communities. This isn't just about women and men, this is about institutionalized monogamy and sexual taboo.

[iargue]

You were the one who strayed off topic in the first place...



I actually agree with you. Just because someone is scientifically abnormal, it doesn't make them a lesser person. I see nothing wrong with considering heterosexuality the norm.

I don't every specifically exclude homosexuality. If thats your thing, good for you.

But I get pissed off whenever people bitch just because gays are not being recognized. They want gay people to be the center of the world for something, because they feel that they are just as popular. When in reality, they are a tiny minority.

[Trichomes]

Nah, I was speaking from a strictly biological standpoint.

[Mishelle]

Why shouldn't they be recognized when the topic at hand also directly effects them? In the lgbtq community gay men are expected to be promiscuous, but gay women are expected to constantly pursue long term relationships, and women who sleep around are generally seen as unfavorable because they're not good enough to be in a relationship. Why? This obviously transcends the "lock and key" analogy.

[iargue]

Just because they can't reproduce doesn't exclude them from evolution since despite heterosexual procreation they continue to exist.

I stated that that concept was both misogynistic and homophobic. My wording was wrong, I should've said heterocentric. I was asked to elaborate on the topic don't pitch a bitch fit just because someone asked my opinion. And like I said, slut shaming occurs in both communities. This isn't just about women and men, this is about institutionalized monogamy and sexual taboo.

I will "pitch a bitch fit" because your telling me I am wrong for liking girls.

Why shouldn't they be recognized when the topic at hand also directly effects them? In the lgbtq community gay men are expected to be promiscuous, but gay women are expected to constantly pursue long term relationships, and women who sleep around are generally seen as unfavorable because they're not good enough to be in a relationship. Why? This obviously transcends the "lock and key" analogy.

Because not everyone is gay. I'm sure less then 10% of the Neocodex community is homosexual or bisexual. We dont have to specifically cater to one form of sexual preference, just the majority.


And here is an extended version of the lock and key analogy.

"If the lock refuses to accept any keys, its a shitty lock. If they key doesn't fit in any lock, its broken"

[Mishelle]

I will "pitch a bitch fit" because your telling me I am wrong for liking girls.




Because not everyone is gay. I'm sure less then 10% of the Neocodex community is homosexual or bisexual. We dont have to specifically cater to one form of sexual preference, just the majority.


And here is an extended version of the lock and key analogy.

"If the lock refuses to accept any keys, its a shitty lock. If they key doesn't fit in any lock, its broken"

Lol where did I say you're wrong for liking girls? I don't think you're trying hard enough, maybe you should try a little harder.

Recognize=/=cater

Edited by Mishelle, 02 November 2010 - 02:19 PM.

[Lucian]

Straying back to the topic, I think those girls posting nude pics/video online aren't all slut. I'm pretty sure a good percentage of them would not have sex let alone do any sexual activities with all of the people they meet.

[iargue]

Straying back to the topic, I think those girls posting nude pics/video online aren't all slut. I'm pretty sure a good percentage of them would not have sex let alone do any sexual activities with all of the people they meet.

You dont have to sleep with someone to be a slut?


Oh.... And I'm guessing you've sent in a picture then.

[Lucian]

No, not on the internet. But I guess a sexually promiscuous person would be considered a slut. But then again, who isn't sexually promiscuous?

[luvsmyncis]

No, not on the internet. But I guess a sexually promiscuous person would be considered a slut. But then again, who isn't sexually promiscuous?

I'm not. I'm a motherfucking saint, bitch.

[redlion]

I'm not. I'm a motherfucking saint, bitch.

By choice?

Cause I'd fuck you.

Never seen a picture of you, but just from the mental aspect, I could fuck you and laugh with you afterwards. Strait sex only tho, you pull out the strapon and I got's to go.

[luvsmyncis]

By choice?

Cause I'd fuck you.

Never seen a picture of you, but just from the mental aspect, I could fuck you and laugh with you afterwards. Strait sex only tho, you pull out the strapon and I got's to go.

[Sweeney]

He's not alone, though. Let's be honest.

[luvsmyncis]

Score!
And I didn't even have to post boobie pictures. See girls? This is how you do it!

[Sweeney]

You mean, if we'd kept quiet, boobie pictures were coming?
Patrick is so getting a strongly worded message about this >_<

[Mr. Hobo]

You mean, if we'd kept quiet, boobie pictures were coming?
Patrick is so getting a strongly worded message about this >_<

Well I'm sure I can piece together something with my expert photoshop/ms paint skills if you were interested

[phalkon]

i request a link to your source

[redlion]

I think you're adorably witty. And the sexual attraction comes from your gift with innuendo and stark honesty. It's not as bad a combination as you painted it in that other thread. or maybe it was this one.

He's not alone, though. Let's be honest.

Um, I thought it was nearly unanimous.

Score!
And I didn't even have to post boobie pictures. See girls? This is how you do it!

Well, don't say you didn't have to. That's still an ace in the hole to seal the deal with any one of us. But yeah.

You mean, if we'd kept quiet, boobie pictures were coming?
Patrick is so getting a strongly worded message about this >_<

You're jumping the gun. You can't rule out the possibility of future endeavors like that.

Well I'm sure I can piece together something with my expert photoshop/ms paint skills if you were interested

Your skillz might just do the trick. But they're not exactly what I'm looking for. Knowamsayin?

[luvsmyncis]

I think you're adorably witty. And the sexual attraction comes from your gift with innuendo and stark honesty. It's not as bad a combination as you painted it in that other thread. or maybe it was this one.

And it probably didn't hurt when the boys started to discover that I've got a "lock" in my drawers instead of a "key".

GIRL POWER.