There's a whole argument in the UK going on about whether homosexuals should be allowed to get married and I'm all for it. If you don't like gay marriage, don't have one.
For some reason my Sidekick 4g doesn't agree with the forums very well and the cursor hops around sometimes while I'm trying to type. Then I can't move the cursor around to where I need it and delete botched sentences, or in a few cases, fragments.
As for you correcting my grammar, there's an ancient saying that goes, "When losing an argument, always correct the other persons grammar." Congratulations on continuing to fulfill that age old saying. Also if I might add, I said in previous paragraphs that I've done my research and looked at both sides of the argument on abortion. I was raised to believe in the bible and I have decided to pick and choose what I want to apply to my every day life. One lesson that I've learned is that life is precious, and I know that to many people, life begins at different times in the gestation period. I personally believe that life begins at conception. When the body(at this time the 'body' I'm referring to is when the sperm fertilizes the egg) and soul come together is when in my eyes life begins. This is a completely different subject from the topic. I am challenging you, Sweeney, to send me a link that will change my view. I am not easily swayed but as I said before, I used to be 100% anti homosexual. I used to think 'they' were abominations and outcasts, and I have personally come a long way on the subject. I want you to edjucate me seeing as you've decided to butt heads with my morals.
Huh. It's nice you don't think gay people are abominations anymore
Just wondering about some of the stuff you said about abortion (sorry if this is off topic) because I'm curious as to how far your beliefs on the subject go and your reasoning.
Life is precious - but the problem with abortion is that there's a lot of grey area. What if the woman was raped? What if there's health complications for her or the child? What if the child is so seriously disabled that they'll have no quality of life - or the mother can't provide a decent quality of life? What if she's an addict, or any number of things, or with an abusive partner? Granted, a fair amount of the time the situation won't always be as dire as that, but if life is sacred, it should also be about the quality of that life. Bringing a child into the world who will suffer horribly could be considered wrong. Similarly, a woman who suffers from severe medical complications may have to abort the fetus or risk not only her life, but also the child's life - and, as life is sacred, isn't it better to have her life saved than have two end?


Find content
Female
