What works and what is paused · Email is limited to account activation and password resets.
Posted 04 June 2013 - 07:20 AM
It was my first time using cheat programs, I said it was a TEST, without any caution, obviously I would be frozen? Next time i'll be more careful. I have about 30 shells and got frozen was not a problem.
I'll start again today. When I find some proxy that WORKS on SS, I'll be back. lol
Posted 04 June 2013 - 09:34 AM
The best list is one you make yourself. Play the games legit and time yourself, then use those times and scores for your list (or for a range if you like to use ranges). The shuffle feature is wonderful to use, as no one gets the same pattern of scores every time. The issue might have been you letting the program run all night, humanly no one can play games all night without a break or sleeping.
So when you said you got the account back just fine you mean they uniced you after a review/request?
Weeaboo
Posted 04 June 2013 - 11:09 AM
So when you said you got the account back just fine you mean they uniced you after a review/request?
Yep. Exactly how it went, I was only frozen for around 4-5days. Normal times for a ticket to even get looked at are months/years sometimes. Iced on I believe Thursday-Friday, and had the account back sometime Monday-Tuesday.
Posted 04 June 2013 - 11:20 AM
Yep. Exactly how it went, I was only frozen for around 4-5days. Normal times for a ticket to even get looked at are months/years sometimes. Iced on I believe Thursday-Friday, and had the account back sometime Monday-Tuesday.
What did you said to get your account back?!
Weeaboo
Posted 04 June 2013 - 11:28 AM
What did you said to get your account back?!
I had some help from our Account Recovery Ticket Guide. http://www.neocodex....y-ticket-guide/
I'm not posting specifics of what I said, sorry. I just somehow got very lucky and got it back.
This though, is a rare case to have a ticket looked at and answered to that fast, and to receive an account back that fast. (or to receive an account back that was frozen for SSing). Results may vary.
Edited by Satsuki, 04 June 2013 - 11:33 AM.
Posted 04 June 2013 - 12:30 PM
The best list is one you make yourself. Play the games legit and time yourself, then use those times and scores for your list (or for a range if you like to use ranges). The shuffle feature is wonderful to use, as no one gets the same pattern of scores every time. The issue might have been you letting the program run all night, humanly no one can play games all night without a break or sleeping.
The list thing is quite understandable. So say I make my own list for MSN and such and only send about 300 games using the sender would I be throwing up red flags or would their be a good chance nothing would happen? I seen someone post about possible packets detecting if you've score sent or not which is what really scares me.
Weeaboo
Posted 04 June 2013 - 12:36 PM
The list thing is quite understandable. So say I make my own list for MSN and such and only send about 300 games using the sender would I be throwing up red flags or would their be a good chance nothing would happen? I seen someone post about possible packets detecting if you've score sent or not which is what really scares me.
Be very careful, double check your scores, game ID, mod (if you used one), and times. I'd say play MSN about 15-20 times, then use those scores and times in your list. (That's what I do). That way it leaves nothing to chance with a range, and the range doesn't send something that gets reviewed (like what it did when I was frozen). If you're careful about everything, and double check, you should be ok, but using the SSer is always a risk. It's better to be slower, if you feel like a time is too fast.
Edited by Satsuki, 04 June 2013 - 12:39 PM.
Posted 04 June 2013 - 01:10 PM
Be very careful, double check your scores, game ID, mod (if you used one), and times. I'd say play MSN about 15-20 times, then use those scores and times in your list. (That's what I do). That way it leaves nothing to chance with a range, and the range doesn't send something that gets reviewed (like what it did when I was frozen). If you're careful about everything, and double check, you should be ok, but using the SSer is always a risk. It's better to be slower, if you feel like a time is too fast.
Of course it's always a risk. Yeah the guides say slower is better. Would a larger MSN list of scores do more harm or good? I'm just curious how they figure out if someone is score sending. Some people seemed to have followed every caution and still have gotten iced for doing stuff I can already do legitimately. It's odd.
Weeaboo
Posted 04 June 2013 - 01:36 PM
Of course it's always a risk. Yeah the guides say slower is better. Would a larger MSN list of scores do more harm or good? I'm just curious how they figure out if someone is score sending. Some people seemed to have followed every caution and still have gotten iced for doing stuff I can already do legitimately. It's odd.
Scores sent to fast, getting a high score when they never played before (or going from a really really low score to a very high one with nothing in between), sending an impossible score, leaving the SS on all night (forgetting to shut it off with a very long list or so), or leaving it unattended and having it send review scores and you weren't there to stop it) and sometimes they just slip up. For MSN, if you're going for ranks, YYB is faster and you can play less, but a longer list for MSN will help for ranks (as 600+ more or less can get you to the next rank sometimes) and team points. It depends on how often you'd like to play/SS the other games, and have a ratio for them. For instance, I have played no SOSD, and most of my games are YYB/MSN/SS. I'll probably play SOSD when another bonus for it comes up.
MSN is the quickest game next to SOSD, and a longer list will require more time to go over it and double check everything you're sending. But a longer list, will help in terms of rank and team points for MSN.
Edited by Satsuki, 04 June 2013 - 01:38 PM.
Posted 04 June 2013 - 02:27 PM
MSN takes me less time overall than YYB though. By longer list to check what does that mean?
Posted 04 June 2013 - 02:31 PM
More lines in a list, the bigger chance for a screw up.
Posted 04 June 2013 - 03:03 PM
Oh so smaller list are better? I would think they'd be easier to detect since the same score would come up more. I compiled like 100 scores from my MSN games.
Posted 04 June 2013 - 09:35 PM
Like Keil said in an other thread:
The size of the list doesn't matter. It's the diversity and uniqueness of the list that matters (meaning A LOT of unique score/time combinations or MODs). I recommend at least 50 unique combintions and just repeat those points
Just make sure there's no typos or other screw ups in your 100 score/time combination.
Posted 05 June 2013 - 04:43 AM
It's stuck on "Gathering Game Data". I've uninstalled then reinstalled. Remove then install. Nothing works. I don't use proxy and other program runs just fine. Anyone can help?
I don't know if anyone's answered you yet, but I came across the same problem recently. It turned out that the problem was with the game I was using. I don't think it works for Terror Mountain Tilt. Try removing the game that it gets stuck on.
Posted 05 June 2013 - 09:09 AM
May i ask how long does the score sender waits in between two score sends? It often takes me about 12 seconds to start the countdown of the new game score send. Is that normal? Thanks.
Dinnerbone'd
Posted 05 June 2013 - 12:50 PM
May i ask how long does the score sender waits in between two score sends? It often takes me about 12 seconds to start the countdown of the new game score send. Is that normal? Thanks.
No time is waited between them, besides the wait time in the list.
Posted 05 June 2013 - 05:25 PM
No time is waited between them, besides the wait time in the list.
I see, but what I am having is that there is time lags. For instance, there is a game is set to wait for 3-4 second to send out, however, what it comes out is that, in the log, score sent time are differed by around 15-16 seconds (they are consecutively send out without "Logged out at some point, Not Sent"), i.e. there is an extra waiting time (12sec) in between.
Is this a problem of my computer?
Posted 05 June 2013 - 05:58 PM
Are the occasional errors something to worry about? I started getting them only today. It says error sending score.
Posted 06 June 2013 - 01:02 PM
So I started SSing Slushie Slinger for the first time today and I've been getting a ton of "Logged out at some point, not sent" errors. Is this something I should be worried about? What might be causing this?
Posted 06 June 2013 - 01:05 PM
So I started SSing Slushie Slinger for the first time today and I've been getting a ton of "Logged out at some point, not sent" errors. Is this something I should be worried about? What might be causing this?
No, you shouldn't be worried, no one actually knows what causes it, it just happens.
Dinnerbone'd
Posted 06 June 2013 - 01:12 PM
No, you shouldn't be worried, no one actually knows what causes it, it just happens.
Night Owl 🌛
Posted 06 June 2013 - 01:26 PM
Don't give me that look, brother.
You can give me that look any time!!! 
*fangirlscream*
Dinnerbone'd
Posted 06 June 2013 - 03:28 PM
You can give me that look any time!!!
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users
Community Forum Software by IP.Board 3.4.8
Licensed to: Neocodex
This topic is locked
