Sacs, sacks, or sax?
#1
Posted 17 May 2012 - 12:53 PM
#2
Posted 17 May 2012 - 01:00 PM
#3
Posted 17 May 2012 - 01:03 PM
Oh is it this? http://www.chessgame...kpage=2#reply35
I am terrible at chess I don't have the concentration hehe.
#4
Posted 17 May 2012 - 01:04 PM
I don't have any idea either but the choice isn't hard.I have no idea what we're talking about...but I love the saxaphone so I went for sax
Oh is it this? http://www.chessgame...kpage=2#reply35
I am terrible at chess I don't have the concentration hehe.
Sacks. Without a doubt.
#5
Posted 17 May 2012 - 01:12 PM
Sacks.
I don't have any idea either but the choice isn't hard.
Sacks. Without a doubt.
How are you so sure noit?
#6
Posted 17 May 2012 - 01:13 PM
edit take #3: I give up trying to post the image. It had sax appeal. The rest is up to your imagination.
Edited by cronus, 17 May 2012 - 01:36 PM.
#7
Posted 17 May 2012 - 01:20 PM
'Your beautiful, tender sacs'
'Your beautiful, tender sax'
Seriously, it's not a hard choice.
#8
Posted 17 May 2012 - 01:49 PM
#9
Posted 17 May 2012 - 03:44 PM
#10
Posted 17 May 2012 - 03:55 PM
#11
Posted 17 May 2012 - 04:21 PM
I'd assume sacks refers to ball sack so yeah. I went for sax.
And not Spider egg sacs?
#12
Posted 17 May 2012 - 04:38 PM
#13
Posted 17 May 2012 - 05:29 PM
And not Spider egg sacs?
Sacks. Ball sacks.
I have messed up thinking. Do not judge me >
#14
Posted 17 May 2012 - 05:44 PM
#15
Posted 17 May 2012 - 07:46 PM
#16
Posted 18 May 2012 - 06:44 AM
#17
Posted 18 May 2012 - 07:46 AM
Why was this put in general debate anyway; it's not much of a 'debate', as such. More like an expression of opinion (as opposed to opinion and fact), or, more simply, and indeed obviously, a poll. (In other words, I find it very hard to see anyone getting butthurt/flamed in this thread.)
#18
Posted 18 May 2012 - 09:44 AM
Well, I'm going to abuse your fucking ridiculous pseudointellectual post in a thread about sacks.It has to be sax. It's a smooth, elegant, small word. It also has the least sexual reference. Of course, if I was a woman, that wouldn't be so bad, but seeing as I'm not... well, I don't think I have to insult your intelligence.
Why was this put in general debate anyway; it's not much of a 'debate', as such. More like an expression of opinion (as opposed to opinion and fact), or, more simply, and indeed obviously, a poll. (In other words, I find it very hard to see anyone getting butthurt/flamed in this thread.)
#19
Posted 18 May 2012 - 09:49 AM
Well, I'm going to abuse your fucking ridiculous pseudointellectual post in a thread about sacks.
Don't you mean sax?
#20
Posted 18 May 2012 - 10:25 AM
Don't you mean sax?
No.
#21
Posted 18 May 2012 - 07:45 PM
Sacks. Ball sacks.
I have messed up thinking. Do not judge me >
No, I don't judge. I'm with you. My mind went straight for the ball sacks. That's why I voted for it.
#22
Posted 19 May 2012 - 02:41 AM
I'm confused. What is 'sacs'?
No, I don't judge. I'm with you. My mind went straight for the ball sacks. That's why I voted for it.
To be honest, I saw you were the last poster, and it made me think of ball sacks. But im not sure if it was because of the title, or because of you. You do remind me of balls. In a nice way!
#24
Posted 19 May 2012 - 02:58 AM
I'm confused. What is 'sacs'?
Hmm isn't it the french word for bag?
Like "Ou est mon sac? Ooh la la - la putain doit avoir volé!"
#25
Posted 19 May 2012 - 05:48 AM
'Your beautiful, tender sacks'
'Your beautiful, tender sacs'
'Your beautiful, tender sax'
Seriously, it's not a hard choice.
Your beautiful, tender sacks of potatoes.
Your beautiful, tender (yolk/amniotic/dural) sacs.
Your beautiful, tender saxophone.
All 3!
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users