Quantcast

Jump to content


Photo

Unpopular Opinions

unpopular opinion scot

  • Please log in to reply
586 replies to this topic

#176 Coops

Coops
  • 🌧️🌩️🌧️


  • 4009 posts


Users Awards

Posted 02 September 2016 - 05:39 PM

404 error on your link :(

 

What I did say is that there are some genetic factors as well that lead to increased risk of Type 2, but that it can also be cause outside of any genetic factors due to a sedentary lifestyle and diet. 

Genetic risk factor doesn't equal genetic condition though, and it appears, to me, you're conflating the two.

 

With type 1, you mention risk factors, not a gene mutation that is causal to type 1 diabetes. These distinctions are crucial, especially if you're going to unintentionally, or intentionally, attempt to justify eugenics, or even just argue the possible validity of another person's shit opinion.

Here is a pretty cool break down:
http://www.diabetes....www.google.com/

It explains the difference between type 1 and type 2. It also illustrates the point about type 2 having stronger genetic components both @Jess and @Kaddict mentioned.

 

No clue why the tag for Kaddict didn't work. Whatever.

 



#177 Ladida

Ladida
  • Night Owl 🌛

  • 2152 posts


Users Awards

Posted 02 September 2016 - 05:48 PM

@Kaddict


How odd, it worked for me



#178 Kaddict

Kaddict
  • 1767 posts


Users Awards

Posted 02 September 2016 - 05:51 PM

Genetic risk factor doesn't equal genetic condition though, and it appears, to me, you're conflating the two.

 

With type 1, you mention risk factors, not a gene mutation that is causal to type 1 diabetes. These distinctions are crucial, especially if you're going to unintentionally, or intentionally, attempt to justify eugenics; or even just argue the possible validity of another person's shit opinion.

Here is a pretty cool break down:
http://www.diabetes....www.google.com/

It explains the difference between type 1 and type 2. It also illustrates the point about type 2 having stronger genetic components both @Jess and @Kaddict mentioned.

 

No clue why the tag for Kaddict didn't work. Whatever.

 

It is probably bc I have a shitty username.



#179 Romy

Romy
  • Neocodex Elite Four Member


  • 4876 posts


Users Awards

Posted 02 September 2016 - 07:02 PM

Saw someone on FB post about being an "oppressed minority" and being unable to do anything about it.

WHAT THE FUCK DID THESE PEOPLE DO.

Spoiler

 

Stop being a coward and get organized. Jeebus.

 

 

 

Also, you guys are going about eugenics in completely the wrong way. You should never EVER force people to get their tubes tied or a vasectomy, you offer some kind of incentive to dissuade them from reproducing.

 

Someone's family has a history of Haemophilia? Huntington's? Offer to cover a large portion of their medical bills if they don't have children.

History of depression or poor mental health in their family? Offer to cover the cost of mental health treatment/medications for as long as they dont have children.

History of cancer?  Same.

 

Think capitalism. Not fascism. 



#180 Kaddict

Kaddict
  • 1767 posts


Users Awards

Posted 02 September 2016 - 07:14 PM

Saw someone on FB post about being an "oppressed minority" and being unable to do anything about it.

WHAT THE FUCK DID THESE PEOPLE DO.

Spoiler

 

Stop being a coward and get organized. Jeebus.

 

 

 

Also, you guys are going about eugenics in completely the wrong way. You should never EVER force people to get their tubes tied or a vasectomy, you offer some kind of incentive to dissuade them from reproducing.

 

Someone's family has a history of Haemophilia? Huntington's? Offer to cover a large portion of their medical bills if they don't have children.

History of depression or poor mental health in their family? Offer to cover the cost of mental health treatment/medications for as long as they dont have children.

History of cancer?  Same.

 

Think capitalism. Not fascism. 

These are actually much more humane alternatives. I thought there was a mediterranean country that was passing a law, but I can't remember the details. I think everyone has to get tested for hemophilia trait, and if you are married and both are carriers, you aren't allowed to have kids. I wish I could remember more about it. 


Here is an opinion that might be unpopular?: Had a patient who was 45 and pregnant. She had 3 elective abortions previously, but decided she wanted to have and keep a baby. She got pregnant at 45. Used meth "occasionally" during her pregnancy. Then, when she finds out the baby most likely has Trisomy 21, she decides to give the baby up for adoption. To me, it is one of the most selfish things I have ever heard. To get pregnant that old, you are rolling the dice with Trisomy. And then to force another person/family/group/entity to take care of that child... eerrrrgggg. It drove me insane. Not to even mention that she didn't seem to care too much about the health of the baby when she was using meth. 



#181 Kaddict

Kaddict
  • 1767 posts


Users Awards

Posted 02 September 2016 - 07:27 PM

Well, to go full out capitalism based eugenics, Big Pharma might as well jack up the prices of any life saving medication for genetically linked diseases to the point where only the very elite could possibly afford it, thus reducing the gene pool of the mass majority from most of these genes. I feel incredibly dirty for coming up with that.

 

Mylan's Epipens anyone?

I wasn't overly bothered by epipen prices being increased (overly is the important word here). That is, until I found out that the father of the CEO is a senator who was pushing a bill which would require schools to have extra on hand in case of an emergency and the kid didn't have one (not a bad idea in and of  itself), but when the private and public sector colludes like that together, that is much worse than what that dirtbag skreli (or whatever his name is) did with jacking up big pharma prices.



#182 Romy

Romy
  • Neocodex Elite Four Member


  • 4876 posts


Users Awards

Posted 02 September 2016 - 08:00 PM

Well, to go full out capitalism based eugenics, Big Pharma might as well jack up the prices of any life saving medication for genetically linked diseases to the point where only the very elite could possibly afford it, thus reducing the gene pool of the mass majority from most of these genes. I feel incredibly dirty for coming up with that.

 

Mylan's Epipens anyone?

That'ts an interesting idea.

 

I wonder what would happen afterwards however. Most big pharma companies depend on government enforcement to maintain their patents on any new drugs they develop (iirc it's ~20 year patent). What would the government do if they decided to jack up the price like that?



#183 Mishelle

Mishelle
  • Bitch Of The Boards

  • 2245 posts


Users Awards

Posted 03 September 2016 - 07:39 AM

I think Pamela Anderson is right about porn. It has completely warped sexuality for the worst.

#184 Ubermensch

Ubermensch
  • 28 posts

Posted 04 September 2016 - 09:48 AM

But diabetes is curable and preventable? I think you're being a little unfair. Let's just kill accidental paraplegics while we're at it, so the clumsiness gene doesn't get spread.


Explain how type one diabetes is curable?

I'm still giggling at the thought of someone with a jewish username promoting eugenics

Heil Ford! Woodhull for president! ELIMINATE THE TACO STANDS!


Ubermensch is the philosophical idea of a "super-human" by Nietzsche, a German philosopher. A quick Google search will show up a lot more informations

#185 NapisaurusRex

NapisaurusRex
  • 🍴Aioli-American🍴

  • 9425 posts


Users Awards

Posted 04 September 2016 - 10:04 AM

@ Ubermensch I'm not going through explaining diabetes again. It can be turned off and on through environmental factors just like almost every other ai disorder. It does take effort though, so maybe we can just do away with lazy people, since that would really create a better master race than treating diabetes like food allergies.

#186 Ubermensch

Ubermensch
  • 28 posts

Posted 04 September 2016 - 10:09 AM

If type one diabetes was that easily cured, to the degree that you can "switch it on and off", how comes people still have to wear insulin pumps? Are they lazy?

#187 NapisaurusRex

NapisaurusRex
  • 🍴Aioli-American🍴

  • 9425 posts


Users Awards

Posted 04 September 2016 - 10:17 AM

Because it hasn't been proven by science and there isn't enough funding/isn't ethical to do studies on it, like I've also already mentioned.

#188 Ubermensch

Ubermensch
  • 28 posts

Posted 04 September 2016 - 10:19 AM

So there isn't a cure then? I'm confused.

#189 cara

cara
  • 56/m/mexico

  • 3364 posts


Users Awards

Posted 04 September 2016 - 10:21 AM

Ubermensch is the philosophical idea of a "super-human" by Nietzsche, a German philosopher. A quick Google search will show up a lot more informations


LOOOOL. This gave me a laugh. Definitely not a Jewish name.

#190 NapisaurusRex

NapisaurusRex
  • 🍴Aioli-American🍴

  • 9425 posts


Users Awards

Posted 04 September 2016 - 10:25 AM

So there isn't a cure then? I'm confused.

There is.

LOOOOL. This gave me a laugh. Definitely not a Jewish name.

That was also part of my unpopular opinion.

LOOOOL. This gave me a laugh. Definitely not a Jewish name.

That was also part of my unpopular opinion.

#191 cara

cara
  • 56/m/mexico

  • 3364 posts


Users Awards

Posted 04 September 2016 - 10:30 AM

I think Pamela Anderson is right about porn. It has completely warped sexuality for the worst.


I don't know what she said about it but this is a super unpopular opinion. I definitely agree though. I try to see the flip side where porn empowers women but I just don't agree ..

#192 Ubermensch

Ubermensch
  • 28 posts

Posted 04 September 2016 - 10:59 AM

There is.
That was also part of my unpopular opinion.
That was also part of my unpopular opinion.


What's the cure?

#193 Coops

Coops
  • 🌧️🌩️🌧️


  • 4009 posts


Users Awards

Posted 04 September 2016 - 11:04 AM

What's the cure?

Are you able to read? Legitimately asking. It's been pointed out that this was rude of me. I am sorry. This was discussed in previous pages.



#194 Mishelle

Mishelle
  • Bitch Of The Boards

  • 2245 posts


Users Awards

Posted 04 September 2016 - 11:07 AM

What's the cure?


Did you actually read the conversation from the beginning before you decided to jump in asking questions about things that have already been addressed?

I don't know what she said about it but this is a super unpopular opinion. I definitely agree though. I try to see the flip side where porn empowers women but I just don't agree ..


Yeah. Like I do believe that sex workers should be protected and we should listen to them in regards to what they say will make their jobs safer but ideally I'd like to work toward a society where people don't have to engage in sex work. I guess anything could be empowering individually but I don't agree that porn empowers all women when most porn focuses solely on the pleasure of men.

#195 cara

cara
  • 56/m/mexico

  • 3364 posts


Users Awards

Posted 04 September 2016 - 11:14 AM

Ubermensch a heads up - you talk to one of them, you talk to all of them lol.

 

 

Yeah. Like I do believe that sex workers should be protected and we should listen to them in regards to what they say will make their jobs safer but ideally I'd like to work toward a society where people don't have to engage in sex work. I guess anything could be empowering individually but I don't agree that porn empowers all women when most porn focuses solely on the pleasure of men. 

 

 

Sex workers are generally not protected .. my understanding is that the porn industry is barely regulated and there are many underage girls working in it. But it has such a bad stigma that prostitution will probably not be legalized and tax pay dollars going into making sex trade workers safer just isn't going to happen. It's a sad world we live in ....



#196 Coops

Coops
  • 🌧️🌩️🌧️


  • 4009 posts


Users Awards

Posted 04 September 2016 - 11:22 AM

Ubermensch a heads up - you talk to one of them, you talk to all of them lol.

What does that mean?



#197 cara

cara
  • 56/m/mexico

  • 3364 posts


Users Awards

Posted 04 September 2016 - 11:36 AM

What does that mean?

 

It means that he had two responses to one post directed to neither of you - one of those responses being a rather rude rhetorical question asking him if he is able to read by the Private Leader of these boards.

 

So it probably means to keep his chin up and to keep directing his posts to who they are intended for, especially since it is Jess and she is always very respectful.

 

Because I don't know about you, but I would feel extremely disheartened being new to the boards and having the Private Leader ask me if I am illiterate.



#198 Coops

Coops
  • 🌧️🌩️🌧️


  • 4009 posts


Users Awards

Posted 04 September 2016 - 11:43 AM

It means that he had two responses to one post directed to neither of you - one of those responses being a rather rude rhetorical question asking him if he is able to read by the Private Leader of these boards.

 

So it probably means to keep his chin up and to keep directing his posts to who they are intended for, especially since it is Jess and she is always very respectful.

 

Because I don't know about you, but I would feel extremely disheartened being new to the boards and having the Private Leader ask me if I am illiterate.

Except that for an entire page he asks for details - when both Jess, Kaddict and I previously discussed this entire matter with Ortin. Telling me it's not directed me is incorrect - since I was involved with the initial conversation. Yes, I'll give it to you, I could have phrased what I said a bit nicer. But considering he spent an entire page asking for information instead of just... I don't know... reading the previous page, I got a bit irritated. 

If you're going to passive aggressively call me out, don't - just straight up say it. I really dislike casual, passive aggressive remarks, and prefer to be approached directly. I'm an adult. I can handle it.



#199 cara

cara
  • 56/m/mexico

  • 3364 posts


Users Awards

Posted 04 September 2016 - 11:47 AM

Yes, I'll give it to you, I could have phrased what I said a bit nicer. 

 

I'm choosing to ignore everything else you said and just walk away with this one line. Because everything else you said was not relevant to anything that I said and looks like an attempt to provoke an argument which I have absolutely no interest in. 



#200 Romy

Romy
  • Neocodex Elite Four Member


  • 4876 posts


Users Awards

Posted 04 September 2016 - 11:48 AM

I think some people here at Codex may only have the reading comprehension of a 10 year old.

 

If you're going to passive aggressively call me out, don't - just straight up say it. I really dislike casual, passive aggressive remarks, and prefer to be approached directly. I'm an adult. I can handle it.

 

lol





Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: unpopular opinion, scot

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users