Quantcast

What works and what is paused · Email is limited to account activation and password resets.

Jump to content


Photo

'New Member' Requirements Adjusted


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
87 replies to this topic

#1 ShadowLink64

ShadowLink64
  • 16735 posts


Users Awards

Posted 28 October 2006 - 05:51 PM

Hello,

In light of the decreased activity on the board, posting requirements to gain Member rank have been increased from 1 post to 5 posts in an effort to divert activity to the board. This means that you cannot download any of our programs until you have made 5 board posts (it used to be 1).

As a result, about 1,311 'Member' accounts have been downgraded to 'New Member' because they have made less than 5 posts.

This change is only temporary and will be adjusted once more when activity increases, as Neocodex has always believed in offering programs to those who readily need them. You will find that 5 posts as a requirement is not much to ask, as other sites usually expect a lot more commitment in order to get access to downloads.

Advertisement

    #2 Shin

    Shin
    • 1586 posts

    Posted 28 October 2006 - 05:56 PM

    NeoCodex still went up 2 places on big-boards.com tongue.gif

    http://www.big-board...highlight/1759/

    I hope this doesn't mean 5 posts of spam instead of 1. x_x

    #3 ShadowLink64

    ShadowLink64
    • 16735 posts


    Users Awards

    Posted 28 October 2006 - 05:57 PM

    Also, there is the whole 'spam' issue associated with this. If an excessive amount of spamming occurs, all that will result is that the posts will be removed and the user will have to make decent posts before downloading.

    QUOTE(shin @ Oct 28 2006, 07:56 PM) View Post

    I hope this doesn't mean 5 posts of spam instead of 1. x_x

    If the posts are clearly spam, then we will require them to make decent posts, or they will risk not being able to download. tongue.gif

    #4 Shin

    Shin
    • 1586 posts

    Posted 28 October 2006 - 05:59 PM

    QUOTE(ShadowLink64 @ Oct 28 2006, 09:57 PM) View Post

    If the posts are clearly spam, then we will require them to make decent posts, or they will risk not being able to download. tongue.gif


    Seems like a good plan. thumbsup.gif

    #5 Tim

    Tim
    • 2795 posts

    Posted 28 October 2006 - 06:02 PM

    Sounds good. There haven't been many good topics to post in lately, so not many new members are posting. :\

    Edited by Shðrty, 28 October 2006 - 06:13 PM.


    #6 Christopher Robin

    Christopher Robin
    • 5302 posts


    Users Awards

    Posted 28 October 2006 - 06:14 PM

    Reasonable request smile.gif Most sites it's around 50 or more...

    #7 ShadowLink64

    ShadowLink64
    • 16735 posts


    Users Awards

    Posted 28 October 2006 - 06:15 PM

    To those who want to spam to get access to the downloads:

    http://www.neocodex....view=getnewpost

    Learn from his example. wink.gif

    QUOTE(shin @ Oct 28 2006, 07:59 PM) View Post

    Seems like a good plan. thumbsup.gif

    Yeah, it just got put into effect. laugh.gif

    #8 Crayon

    Crayon
    • 913 posts

    Posted 28 October 2006 - 06:30 PM

    QUOTE(ShadowLink64 @ Oct 28 2006, 07:15 PM) View Post

    To those who want to spam to get access to the downloads:

    http://www.neocodex....view=getnewpost

    Learn from his example. wink.gif
    Yeah, it just got put into effect. laugh.gif


    Owned.

    #9 the_hitman

    the_hitman
    • 800 posts

    Posted 28 October 2006 - 06:32 PM

    Personally i think it should be 10 decent posts before the member rank is apllied but thats just my opinion. But this wou;d stop members posting a welcome topic then just download programs. Good work shadowlink.

    #10 Plew

    Plew
    • 1754 posts

    Posted 28 October 2006 - 06:36 PM

    QUOTE(the_hitman @ Oct 28 2006, 07:32 PM) View Post

    Personally i think it should be 10 decent posts before the member rank is apllied but thats just my opinion. But this wou;d stop members posting a welcome topic then just download programs. Good work shadowlink.

    nice idea. 10 posts sounds way better than 5 posts shifty.gif

    #11 ShadowLink64

    ShadowLink64
    • 16735 posts


    Users Awards

    Posted 28 October 2006 - 06:39 PM

    QUOTE(Plew @ Oct 28 2006, 08:36 PM) View Post

    nice idea. 10 posts sounds way better than 5 posts shifty.gif

    I think so too, but it's a good idea to work up gradually (to make sure the idea works first of all). tongue.gif

    In my opinion, there's no excuse for this lack of activity since program usage is really really high right now (over 430 uses in the last 24 hours) compared to the 300 or so I saw in September. dry.gif I figure some of that can be sacrificed to get some posts on the board.

    #12 Plew

    Plew
    • 1754 posts

    Posted 28 October 2006 - 06:43 PM

    QUOTE(ShadowLink64 @ Oct 28 2006, 06:39 PM) View Post

    I think so too, but it's a good idea to work up gradually (to make sure the idea works first of all). tongue.gif

    In my opinion, there's no excuse for this lack of activity since program usage is really really high right now (over 430 uses in the last 24 hours) compared to the 300 or so I saw in September. dry.gif I figure some of that can be sacrificed to get some posts on the board.

    i thought all the progs were getting runtime errors.... blink.gif

    #13 Crayon

    Crayon
    • 913 posts

    Posted 28 October 2006 - 06:46 PM

    QUOTE(Plew @ Oct 28 2006, 06:43 PM) View Post

    i thought all the progs were getting runtime errors.... blink.gif


    Most of them are.. if you try Trix's first program (Daily Doer,) it would still work. If you try FireBird's Auto Pricer, you will get a Runtime error.

    #14 ShadowLink64

    ShadowLink64
    • 16735 posts


    Users Awards

    Posted 28 October 2006 - 06:47 PM

    QUOTE(Crayon @ Oct 28 2006, 08:46 PM) View Post

    Most of them are.. if you try Trix's first program (Daily Doer,) it would still work. If you try FireBird's Auto Pricer, you will get a Runtime error.

    They should get fixed by the author.... or we should do another downloads cleanup. unsure.gif We can't have programs that don't work in our downloads system. That's just unacceptable service.... we want programmers and members to hold the opinion that Neocodex is home to the best programs of its type. tongue.gif

    #15 nox

    nox
    • 6707 posts


    Users Awards

    Posted 28 October 2006 - 07:10 PM

    i tried a handful of codex programs a week or so ago, and nearly all of them had some sort of error

    #16 ShadowLink64

    ShadowLink64
    • 16735 posts


    Users Awards

    Posted 28 October 2006 - 07:11 PM

    QUOTE(nox @ Oct 28 2006, 09:10 PM) View Post

    i tried a handful of codex programs a week or so ago, and nearly all of them had some sort of error

    And that says something about the quality of some of our programs, doesn't it? 1we8.gif

    I do believe we're going to have to take a look at these programs again. tongue.gif

    #17 Crayon

    Crayon
    • 913 posts

    Posted 28 October 2006 - 07:42 PM

    QUOTE(ShadowLink64 @ Oct 28 2006, 07:11 PM) View Post

    And that says something about the quality of some of our programs, doesn't it? 1we8.gif

    I do believe we're going to have to take a look at these programs again. tongue.gif


    PM me if you need help.

    #18 Mr. Hobo

    Mr. Hobo
    • 8152 posts


    Users Awards

    Posted 28 October 2006 - 08:23 PM

    It would be funny if you made the minimum requirement to be a member is a PPD count of at least 1 tongue.gif. Annoy those leeches

    #19 jpt

    jpt
    • 1288 posts

    Posted 28 October 2006 - 09:05 PM

    Gotta love all those newbies posting 5 times and then leaving again.

    #20 Kyle

    Kyle
    • Legit.

    • 2082 posts


    Users Awards

    Posted 28 October 2006 - 09:42 PM

    QUOTE(jocxo @ Oct 28 2006, 10:10 PM) View Post

    finally yahoo.gif yahoo.gif yahoo.gif yahoo.gif yahoo.gif yahoo.gif yahoo.gif yahoo.gif yahoo.gif

    i was hoping that you had to have 10-25 thumbsup.gif but tis ok biggrin.gif

    Im with you. I would like to see it raised even more, but I guess thats because ive already met the requirements tongue.gif

    #21 the_hitman

    the_hitman
    • 800 posts

    Posted 28 October 2006 - 11:45 PM

    QUOTE(ShadowLink64 @ Oct 29 2006, 01:47 PM) View Post

    They should get fixed by the author.... or we should do another downloads cleanup. unsure.gif We can't have programs that don't work in our downloads system. That's just unacceptable service.... we want programmers and members to hold the opinion that Neocodex is home to the best programs of its type. tongue.gif


    I'm quite sure all of mine still work becuase i fix and re-release it everytime someone reports an error that i can fix.

    Plus shadowlink working up is a good idea and i think you should get it to 10 posts then leave it that way. It would make codex more active i reckon.

    Edited by the_hitman, 28 October 2006 - 11:47 PM.


    #22 otherworld

    otherworld
    • 1022 posts

    Posted 29 October 2006 - 01:12 AM

    yeah this is just gonna mean alot of gravedigging on programs that dont even work where newbies can add good job or something like that

    #23 Waser Lave

    Waser Lave
    • 25516 posts


    Users Awards

    Posted 29 October 2006 - 04:15 AM

    I still think we should implement my idea of decreasing a members post count by 2 for every message of spam which they do. devil.gif So if their first message is spam, they'll go down to -1 posts. tongue.gif

    #24 Lemonblood

    Lemonblood
    • 2830 posts

    Posted 29 October 2006 - 04:37 AM

    I'm in doubt of this increasing activity.. Hn.

    #25 _visitor_deleted

    _visitor_deleted
    • 1 posts

    Posted 29 October 2006 - 06:22 AM

    i dont care if i have to post more cuz i love posting!!


    1 user(s) are reading this topic

    0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users