This topic is locked
QUOTE (BrknPhoenix @ Nov 10 2007, 02:01 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Presently, VB.NET has its own tutorial section whereas all other .NET things are lumped under other. C# has more tutorials than VB.NET so I'd at least think it'd be proper for that to have a section (hm, I think I asked about this in this forum over a year ago and it never got a reply, lol.)
Further, I'd recommend just calling it all .NET Tutorials, as opposed to having separate sections of VB.NET, C#.NET, ASP.NET, etc, because they are all intertwined. Aside from some syntax differences, someone who is only moderately experienced in .NET can easily look at VB.NET and convert it to C#, or vice versa. The differences are purely in syntax but they use all the same libraries and are organized in the same way. ASP.NET of course is a little different, except for the fact that it uses the languages C# and VB.NET as its programming languages. It isn't one itself...
Anyway, I just think this would be a more logical way to organize it. Just came to mind as I was submitting a tutorial.
Further, I'd recommend just calling it all .NET Tutorials, as opposed to having separate sections of VB.NET, C#.NET, ASP.NET, etc, because they are all intertwined. Aside from some syntax differences, someone who is only moderately experienced in .NET can easily look at VB.NET and convert it to C#, or vice versa. The differences are purely in syntax but they use all the same libraries and are organized in the same way. ASP.NET of course is a little different, except for the fact that it uses the languages C# and VB.NET as its programming languages. It isn't one itself...
Anyway, I just think this would be a more logical way to organize it. Just came to mind as I was submitting a tutorial.
So, should Codex make new sections in the programming tutorial area to address all the .NET languages separately?
Voice your opinion! Vote!
