Opinions?
Should Neocodex promote a new administrator?
#1
Posted 03 November 2008 - 06:53 PM
Opinions?
#2
Posted 03 November 2008 - 06:54 PM
Thread over.
#3
Posted 03 November 2008 - 07:02 PM
#4
Posted 03 November 2008 - 07:15 PM
#5
Posted 03 November 2008 - 07:17 PM
#6
Posted 03 November 2008 - 07:25 PM
#7
Posted 03 November 2008 - 07:57 PM
#8
Posted 03 November 2008 - 08:11 PM
#9
Posted 03 November 2008 - 08:21 PM
#10
Posted 03 November 2008 - 08:22 PM
#11
Posted 03 November 2008 - 08:50 PM
We don't need SMods.
We don't need Mods.
Promoting people is stupid.
We need active Techs, that's it.
#12
Posted 03 November 2008 - 08:57 PM
But we don't even have an admin to implement such an idea.
We're at a dead end here.
SOMETHING needs to be done.
#13
Posted 03 November 2008 - 09:03 PM
#14
Posted 03 November 2008 - 09:04 PM
Later guys.
#15
Posted 03 November 2008 - 09:20 PM
#16
Posted 03 November 2008 - 09:29 PM
#17
Posted 04 November 2008 - 06:28 AM
#18
Posted 04 November 2008 - 06:33 AM
I agree with this. Maybe make a mod an smod and add a new mod.
#19
Posted 04 November 2008 - 02:59 PM
Since Hydrogen and Brandon are the only ones left, I can see some formalities that were once part of admin nomination no longer being important since the rank is a rather inactive one right now. If anyone remembers what the site was like in 2005, there were six of us admins (five not counting AUS since he resigned in 2005 sometime). Some of the admins were inexperienced technically, but were good at public relations. Some were good with technical issues but disliked dealing with public issues. All felt the passion for making the site a better place. This shows that you don't neccessarily need a well-rounded person to hold the admin position, but rather, a bunch of specialists that aren't dolts when it comes to representing the site when the others aren't present. Oh, and they need to be active and give up copious amounts of their time.
Usually, but sometimes there are issues with how much power is given to who in the hierarchy. Sometimes it's just very nice to have an admin on and have stuff get done right then and there. Even when there were six of us, I didn't think that many admins spoiled the soup. It was rather fun.
#20
Posted 04 November 2008 - 03:14 PM
Thoughts?
Admin(s) can decide on that.
...
Idea of a new admin hasn't completely escaped me. Have one or two people in mind with who it'd be as well. Not that a new admin is something that'll happen.
#21
Posted 04 November 2008 - 03:16 PM
...
Idea of a new admin hasn't completely escaped me. Have one or two people in mind with who it'd be as well. Not that a new admin is something that'll happen.
I do believe it's pretty much up to you now
#22
Posted 04 November 2008 - 03:16 PM
...
Idea of a new admin hasn't completely escaped me. Have one or two people in mind with who it'd be as well. Not that a new admin is something that'll happen.
Considering it's just you and Hydro who's MIA, maybe you (or you guys) should nominate people and we should vote?
#23
Posted 04 November 2008 - 03:17 PM
Bad idea. The choice shouldn't be public because it'll be totally bias towards friends etc. I think it should be up to the remaining admin (no I don't count hydro as admin anymore) and the 2 smods to decide tbh.
#24
Posted 04 November 2008 - 03:20 PM
were good until then
#25
Posted 04 November 2008 - 03:28 PM
There's more bias leaving the decision up to 1 or 3 people rather than a few hundred, no?
If anything, it could simply help Pyke decide, but not be definitive. A poll would be useful either way
I also think a privatemember+ voting would be more useful.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users


