sup ill visit yall decomposing skeletons in a couple hunned years
Ok so who else is freezing themself
#1
Posted 28 May 2009 - 02:45 PM
sup ill visit yall decomposing skeletons in a couple hunned years
#2
Posted 28 May 2009 - 03:17 PM
I would think no.
#3
Posted 28 May 2009 - 03:21 PM
#4
Posted 28 May 2009 - 03:26 PM
#6
Posted 28 May 2009 - 03:35 PM
#7
Posted 28 May 2009 - 03:36 PM
#8
Posted 28 May 2009 - 03:39 PM
Which is what I don't understand about this.
#9
Posted 28 May 2009 - 03:41 PM
I always assumed it was better to be frozen pre-death. Like a bit before an uncurable disease kills you. Didn't they freeze Walt Disney before he died.
Nevermind that's a myth
#10
Posted 28 May 2009 - 03:46 PM
#11
Posted 28 May 2009 - 03:52 PM
#12
Posted 28 May 2009 - 03:55 PM
http://en.wikipedia....mically-induced
kinda creepy:
Before the company moved to Arizona from Riverside, California in 1994, it became a center of controversy when a county coroner ruled that Alcor client Dora Kent (Saul Kent's mother) was murdered with barbiturates before her head was removed for neuropreservation by the company's staff. Alcor contended that the drug was administered after her death. No charges were ever filed
Edited by rockage, 28 May 2009 - 03:59 PM.
#13
Posted 28 May 2009 - 04:20 PM
At current technology levels, it's pointless.
#14
Posted 28 May 2009 - 04:23 PM
#15
Posted 28 May 2009 - 04:28 PM
Yeah, it does. Unless you're at absolute zero, you will get cellular breakdown.
And over long periods, even the slightest bit of decay will be catastrophic.
#16
Posted 28 May 2009 - 04:31 PM
#17
Posted 28 May 2009 - 04:52 PM
Maybe in science fiction. The real world doesn't work that simply.
And yes, I know that absolute zero is unreached, and theoretically unreachable.
#18
Posted 28 May 2009 - 05:04 PM
#19
Posted 28 May 2009 - 05:09 PM
Ok, look; you cannot simultaneously cease metabolic activity whilst using any sort of intravenous fluid to alter said metabolism.
They're simply incompatible.
What exactly do you know about real cryonics or cryogenics? All current freezings are post-mortem, which isn't what I'm talking about.
#20
Posted 28 May 2009 - 05:11 PM
What exactly do you know about real cryogenics? (i'd actually like to know, it's an interesting subject).
#21
Posted 28 May 2009 - 05:13 PM
What exactly do you know about real cryogenics? (i'd actually like to know, it's an interesting subject).
Nothing specific, but I know a hell of a lot about biology.
#22
Posted 28 May 2009 - 05:18 PM
it seems like a scam to me :\
#23
Posted 28 May 2009 - 05:27 PM
it seems like a scam to me :\
I believe what they do for postmortem preservations is flood the body with antifreeze, which, in theory, stops ice crystals forming in the tissues as the body is frozen. Personally, though, I doubt this works fully, given how long it'd take the stuff to diffuse into muscle. Bone marrow, particularly, would probably still be destroyed.
Real cryonics would require the body to be cooled to very near absolute zero, and almost instantaneously to avoid the formation of crystals.
Of course, if a blood substitude could be developed that containted pervasive antifreeze, that would get around the rapid freezing issue. Arctic cod have a similar enzyme that stops them from freezing to death.
As for warming the body up again... that'd be even trickier
#24
Posted 28 May 2009 - 05:32 PM
#25
Posted 28 May 2009 - 05:33 PM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users


