Isn't interpretation solidifying the fact that laws are opinionated?
It is, yes, but I was trying to make a point that there's a difference between the interpretation of a lawmaker and the interpretation of law enforcement therefore emphasizing the power in the enforcement and not the laws themselves. I apologize if that was confusing. A good judge will try to look at the intent of the law, not just what the law says. So in that respect, power lies with the enforcement officer. I'm not sure what your exact position is in law enforcement, but I'm sure you, for example, may see someone break a certain law, but let them go because in your opinion, they had good reason to do so or it wasn't severe enough to justify enforcement other than a warning. In that way, the power lies with you, not the law, not the lawmakers. That's why I asked what their interpretation of "higher power" was.