Quantcast

Jump to content


Photo

A Real Homosexuality Poll


  • Please log in to reply
64 replies to this topic

Poll: Are you for or against homosexuality?

Select the most appropriate response (related to your stance on Homosexuality)

You cannot see the results of the poll until you have voted. Please login and cast your vote to see the results of this poll.
Vote Guests cannot vote

#26 Jaf

Jaf
  • 1654 posts

Posted 19 June 2006 - 02:32 PM

Yes a simple and logical theory, and I do believe homosexuality (and other orientations, well maybe except for pedophilia) stride against nature and have no purpose for the growth of humanity.
Similar thoughts went through the Dutch sailors as they discovered and slaughtered the "pointless" Dodo.

So why do we have homosexuals? Is it Mother Nature's way of saying the world is overpopulated?
Beats me.

But I didn't quite get your last line Frizzle.

#27 Cataliste

Cataliste
  • Codex's Right Hand

  • 4662 posts


Users Awards

Posted 19 June 2006 - 02:50 PM

Really and truely. I don't give a shit. It does nto scar eme or anything. If they wanna fuck asses, let them.

And I could give a shit less about church either. Eeyore is right. Christianity is dumb (as are most religions.)

#28 RandomNameIgnoreIt

RandomNameIgnoreIt
  • 1828 posts


Users Awards

Posted 19 June 2006 - 02:58 PM

Yes a simple and logical theory, and I do believe homosexuality (and other orientations, well maybe except for pedophilia) stride against nature and have no purpose for the growth of humanity.


So pedophilia doesn't stride against nature and have no purpose for the growth of humanity? :p

#29 Justin

Justin
  • <img src ='http://i32.tinypic.com/302oyrp.jpg'>

  • 3595 posts

Posted 19 June 2006 - 02:58 PM

This makes no sense.

How can you be strongly for an orientation?

It's like saying someone can strongly be for liking cookies.

Doesn't make sense.

Perhaps change the question.. are you for the civil rights of humans or against them and prefer a Nazi state?

#30 RandomNameIgnoreIt

RandomNameIgnoreIt
  • 1828 posts


Users Awards

Posted 19 June 2006 - 03:00 PM

Perhaps change the question.. are you for the civil rights of humans or against them and prefer a Nazi state?


The point was to make a non-biased poll, not make it biased in the other direction :p

#31 Jaf

Jaf
  • 1654 posts

Posted 19 June 2006 - 03:04 PM

So pedophilia doesn't stride against nature and have no purpose for the growth of humanity? :p

I was actually thinking about the reproduce aspect. Yes I did.

#32 Christopher Robin

Christopher Robin
  • 5302 posts


Users Awards

Posted 19 June 2006 - 03:06 PM

ACTUALLY, Brkn, mine does NOT have biased answers, it has a selection of answers to not only voice if you're for or against, but WHAT you're for/against <_<

#33 Tetiel

Tetiel
  • 11533 posts


Users Awards

Posted 19 June 2006 - 04:20 PM

Well I have theory Jaf, I'm saying it's naturally wrong. Why might you say? It's pretty simple, bare with me.

We as humans are animals, and as we are animals, just like plants, and other living things, the only natural point of our existance (not morally, religiously etc), is to survive and spread our gene.

Since homosexuals cannot reproduce, they cannot surive on (obviously things are like that nowdays, like I said, just a theory and a belief.) so they're in the end, against nature and will just die out, like the Dodo and the French.

But I don't care, because even though it's wrong, we're all entitled to our own beliefs and opinions, I personally think it's acceptable to kill people who sleep with your family members.

Soooooooo... people who don't want children are pointless too?

#34 Justin

Justin
  • <img src ='http://i32.tinypic.com/302oyrp.jpg'>

  • 3595 posts

Posted 19 June 2006 - 07:00 PM

Soooooooo... people who don't want children are pointless too?



And people that are unable to bear children; they're useless, as well, if you believe what he says.

#35 Frizzle

Frizzle
  • M'lord

  • 16889 posts


Users Awards

Posted 20 June 2006 - 02:26 AM

Of course! Do you think natures going to take pity on them?

Ahh look at people who can't concieve, let's buy them a puppy!

NO! Mother Nature's a cruel bitch you know, don't mess with her.

#36 Eeyore

Eeyore
  • <img src ='http://i34.tinypic.com/2mecsg1.jpg'>

  • 7908 posts


Users Awards

Posted 20 June 2006 - 03:55 AM

But if Mother Nature was a cruel bitch, methinks she'd not let gays occur in the first place...

I think the idea of having a developed brain unlike that of other animals gives us the choice to do things that aren't the normal and aren't going to be good for the race on a whole in terms of evolution and reproduction. But in saying that, medicine is keeping people that would normally have died alive and capable to reproduce, so they pass on their 'inferior' genes, rather then dying and helping to make the human race more elite. I for one don't want that to stop happening because it's not natural, so I don't want homosexuality to stop either.

ACTUALLY, Brkn, mine does NOT have biased answers, it has a selection of answers to not only voice if you're for or against, but WHAT you're for/against <_<


But yours were phrased in a more influencial way.

'Gay is gay, its disgusting. They are forever condemned to hell.'

Pssh, if I didn't like gays I wouldn't think them condemed for hell, simply because I'm not catholic, that and it's really very extreme.

'Gays are alright. Go them.'

Hardly balances out the extremety. On one side there are people wanting gays to go to hell, and on the others there are...what? People sat waving a little gay pride flag in their chair, they support it but really...not that important.

Was kiiinda bias, I probably didn't get my point across very well, but I can see where brkn is coming from.

#37 Frizzle

Frizzle
  • M'lord

  • 16889 posts


Users Awards

Posted 20 June 2006 - 04:03 AM

But if Mother Nature was a cruel bitch, methinks she'd not let gays occur in the first place...


That's why homosexuals are mother natures playtoys, to laugh at and poke fun at.

#38 Jaf

Jaf
  • 1654 posts

Posted 20 June 2006 - 04:11 AM

That's why homosexuals are mother natures playtoys, to laugh at and poke fun at.

Just like blind, deaf, disabled...

But what is actually the point of this topic? I'm confused what we are making arguments for.

#39 Paradox

Paradox
  • 106 posts

Posted 20 June 2006 - 08:17 AM

I am strongly for it. Love is love. How can the world stop two people from loving each other? It makes no sense. Also, for reproduction... homosexuals might not be able to reproduce [Earth is overpopulated anyways...]... but they can take children who don't have a home [adopt them], perhaps take them out of trouble.

#40 sonic

sonic
  • 3452 posts

Posted 20 June 2006 - 11:25 AM

I am actually vice president of TAG at our school. "Teens Against Gays"

There is a stupid Soda club for gays, se we made our club.

#41 Jotun

Jotun
  • 197 posts

Posted 24 June 2006 - 10:46 AM

Even though I'm bi I don't see the need to be for or against it you are who you are and theres no point encouraging or discouraging it.

#42 pyke

pyke
  • 13686 posts


Users Awards

Posted 24 June 2006 - 10:53 AM

I am actually vice president of TAG at our school. "Teens Against Gays"

There is a stupid Soda club for gays, se we made our club.

The big difference is they are a group that is embracing what they can't control. Your just being prejudice. I also have trouble believing any school would allow such a club.

I hope you have a homosexual son/daughter.

#43 Frizzle

Frizzle
  • M'lord

  • 16889 posts


Users Awards

Posted 24 June 2006 - 10:54 AM

I hate groups that encourage or discourage sexuality or race.

It just divdes and destroys equality..

#44 pyke

pyke
  • 13686 posts


Users Awards

Posted 24 June 2006 - 10:58 AM

I hate groups that encourage or discourage sexuality or race.

It just divdes and destroys equality..

True enough. At this stage though you can't stomp out groups like gay pride groups. The reason they exist is because people don't accept them as equal people. Until that happens, you can look forward to the gay pride parade xD

#45 Justin

Justin
  • <img src ='http://i32.tinypic.com/302oyrp.jpg'>

  • 3595 posts

Posted 24 June 2006 - 11:09 AM

Strongly X 100,000 against it.


Well then it'll sure suck IF you find out you're gay. lol

#46 Jotun

Jotun
  • 197 posts

Posted 24 June 2006 - 11:56 AM

Somebody can't become gay. Even if some retarted fake ass science proves they can, you can still rehabilitate.

I'm sorry but thats nottrue. Even the so called ex-gay clinics have said that you can't change your attraction. The only thing they do is just make you hate yourself and not seek out any relationships with anything with the same-sex. Is that what you mean by rehabilitate.

#47 Jotun

Jotun
  • 197 posts

Posted 24 June 2006 - 01:13 PM

So you're saying you can't rehabilitate a rapist? How about a child molestor? A murderer? It's all the same thing, there is nothing you cannot rehabilitate. Somebody can be "gay" and not indulge in the acts of a gay. You guys can believe your science fiction stories, but i'm telling you right here they only say you can't rehab it because they don't want to give it up.

Well to be honest they can change as much you can become gay yourself. I can tell you from personal experience that no matter how hard you try your still going to be be gay. And even if you don't seek out relationships what kind of life would you have? How fulfilling would it be being in a relationship with someone you don't love or being alone for the rest of your life? And lastly whats the point of comparing homosexuality to rapist and child molestor thats just sick.

#48 Frizzle

Frizzle
  • M'lord

  • 16889 posts


Users Awards

Posted 24 June 2006 - 01:16 PM

He's saying you can change, being homosexual isn't set in your genes, just like being a murder or a peadophile isn't set in your genes, yet we still have rehab for murder's and peadophiles, so why not homosexuals?

In Alias' view they are all wrong.

#49 pyke

pyke
  • 13686 posts


Users Awards

Posted 24 June 2006 - 01:59 PM

Somebody can't become gay. Even if some retarted fake ass science proves they can, you can still rehabilitate.

You guys can believe your science fiction stories, but i'm telling you right here they only say you can't rehab it because they don't want to give it up.

You think for one second that homosexual people are gay because they choose to be gay? Why would one take the option that will have them ridiculed and observed like a piece of meat ? Your basically refuting science because it stands in the way of your religion.

#50 Frizzle

Frizzle
  • M'lord

  • 16889 posts


Users Awards

Posted 24 June 2006 - 02:41 PM

I believe it's true aswell what Alias believes in. People can choose who they fancy, just like who they want to become friends with, or what kind of ice cream they like.

Not all gay people are obeserved like you described Pyke.

It's like choosing a religion.


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users