Where do you guys fall?
Political Compass
#1
Posted 07 October 2008 - 03:17 AM
#2
Posted 07 October 2008 - 05:10 AM
#4
Posted 07 October 2008 - 06:56 AM
#5
Posted 07 October 2008 - 07:13 AM
#7
Posted 07 October 2008 - 12:13 PM
#8
Posted 07 October 2008 - 12:55 PM
Edited by Kyle, 16 April 2012 - 01:41 PM.
#9
Posted 07 October 2008 - 01:32 PM
By the way, the left/right is economic, up/down is social.
Edited by Fred Hampton, 07 October 2008 - 01:35 PM.
#10
Posted 07 October 2008 - 02:27 PM
#11
Posted 07 October 2008 - 02:56 PM
#12
Posted 07 October 2008 - 03:14 PM
Also, its a good idea to take a look at the page they display following the test. In particular, these images:
It puts your ideals into perspective.
Also, I had a topic a long time ago about something that shows up on this test. The idea that people with inherited disabilities shouldn't be allowed to reproduce. It got like three replies
#13
Posted 07 October 2008 - 03:58 PM
#14
Posted 07 October 2008 - 07:10 PM
#15
Posted 07 October 2008 - 07:16 PM
I thought Ron Paul was a libertarian.
Edited by FlashGM, 07 October 2008 - 07:17 PM.
#16
Posted 07 October 2008 - 07:24 PM
#18
Posted 08 October 2008 - 12:05 AM
I thought Ron Paul was a libertarian.
Not really. I mean, the dems might be a bit high on the y axis, but those are generally right.
#19
Posted 08 October 2008 - 03:01 AM
Not really. I mean, the dems might be a bit high on the y axis, but those are generally right.
Ya, I don't think democrats are that authoritarian. They even seem a bit too far right
Also Mike Gravel is an interesting guy, first one I saw in the purple quadrant besides Friedman and he has alot of interesting opinions.
http://en.wikipedia...._of_Mike_Gravel
#20
Posted 08 October 2008 - 05:03 AM
Not really. I mean, the dems might be a bit high on the y axis, but those are generally right.
uh...no man...are you confusing right and left lol (mike gravel is wayyyyyyyyyyyyyyy far left)
and nah man ron paul is a libertarian lol
Edited by nox, 08 October 2008 - 05:10 AM.
#21
Posted 08 October 2008 - 07:58 AM
Um, not really. He is in favor of the Fair Tax, which is basically as non-partisan as you can get. His other policies suggest he is in favor of deregulation, which makes him an economic freedom advocate (hence his closeness to the right end of the graph). He might be a liberal in social issues (which he is) but he is most definitely in favor of economic freedom. Otherwise he wouldn't have "...previously sought for the Democratic Party and Libertarian Party nomination for the office of President of the United States of America in 2008."
And Ron Paul is an economic right winger - strong economic freedoms. But he isn't a libertarian in the actual sense of the word. He is a Libertarian, as in the Libertarian Party of the US, but that isn't the same as a libertarian (small 'L').
#22
Posted 08 October 2008 - 08:00 AM
This compass incorporates a larger range of political philosophy unbeknownst to the average Amerikkkan and generally the right side is capitalist to varying degrees.
Also with the question of libertarianism, that simply means you believe in enabling the largest amount of rights for the people with little regulation (with Anarchism being the highest level of libertarianism). The Libertarian Party (note the capitalized L) has butchered this word to perpetuate their right-wing agenda in deregulation for companies which hundreds of years of class struggle fought for by workers has gained them (minimum wages, child labour, vacation, sick pay, pension, etc). Any deregulation would completely revert this even further than it already is in the Amerikkkan state for your average worker (especially now with the crisis).
Edited by Fred Hampton, 08 October 2008 - 08:12 AM.
#23
Posted 08 October 2008 - 08:10 AM
This compass incorporates a larger range of political philosophy unbeknownst to the average Amerikkkan and generally the right side is capitalist to varying degrees.
Amerikkkan?
I think it's pretty obvious though that most the issues people put the spotlight on aren't all the main issues within politics. It's not surprising really, politics is 90% theatrics, as evidenced by the fact that Reagan was ever a president.
#24
Posted 08 October 2008 - 08:14 AM
This compass incorporates a larger range of political philosophy unbeknownst to the average Amerikkkan and generally the right side is capitalist to varying degrees.
Also with the question of libertarianism, that simply means you believe in enabling the largest amount of rights for the people with little regulation (with Anarchism being the highest level of libertarianism). The Libertarian Party (note the capitalized L) has butchered this word to perpetuate their right-wing agenda in deregulation for companies which hundreds of years of class struggle fought for by workers has gained them (minimum wages, child labour, vacation, sick pay, pension, etc). Any deregulation would completely revert this even further than it already is in the Amerikkkan state for your average worker (especially now with the crisis).
Quoted as to not get overlooked, last on first page. ;
I think it's pretty obvious though that most the issues people put the spotlight on aren't all the main issues within politics. It's not surprising really, politics is 90% theatrics, as evidenced by the fact that Reagan was ever a president.
It's true, western capitalist politics is a soap opera.
#25
Posted 08 October 2008 - 08:21 AM
This compass incorporates a larger range of political philosophy unbeknownst to the average Amerikkkan and generally the right side is capitalist to varying degrees.
Also with the question of libertarianism, that simply means you believe in enabling the largest amount of rights for the people with little regulation (with Anarchism being the highest level of libertarianism). The Libertarian Party (note the capitalized L) has butchered this word to perpetuate their right-wing agenda in deregulation for companies which hundreds of years of class struggle fought for by workers has gained them (minimum wages, child labour, vacation, sick pay, pension, etc). Any deregulation would completely revert this even further than it already is in the Amerikkkan state for your average worker (especially now with the crisis).
Your point on libertarianism is exactly what I was trying to say, but more radical. Ron Paul and other Libertarians in the US aren't exactly social libertarians in the actual sense of the word.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users