Find content
Not Telling
Personally, I'm skeptical about this protest. Parasitism is what I see here, why should those who have worked hard to get where they are, give a free lunch to those who didn't? Why should I be punished for working hard to get where I am today by having my well earned pay cut down and given to some slob who might just spend it on alcohol and drugs. But that's only my opinion if these people are calling for more benefits; since I saw quite a few of these down with capitalism signs, this is what I'm assuming.
In all honestly I'm not seeing what these Occupy people are trying to accomplish, they keep talking about their fight against corporate greed and corruption on their website, but really that's not saying much. That's not presenting any solution to whatever their problem may be. These people seem to be there just to complain, not to do anything productive. If someone could tell me what exactly their goal is, in very specific non-generalized answers, I would appreciate it. Oh, and actually offering a solution would be good.
Vendel
Member Since 13 Aug 2011Offline Private
#1521601 Occupy Wall Street ?
Posted by
on 24 October 2011 - 10:35 PM
#1501041 Westboro Baptist Church
Posted by
on 17 August 2011 - 06:40 PM
I forgot to what extent I'm allowed to swear on this forum so I'm going to censor my speech a bit.
I have no idea what RAINBOW UNICORN DEFECATION your talking about, but I INTERCOURSE fail to see what point your attempting to make. If you are trying to make a case about priests and their bad habit of having unicorniphiliac relations with kids, then I guess I agree... But honestly I think you could have chosen a better way
.
I have no idea what RAINBOW UNICORN DEFECATION your talking about, but I INTERCOURSE fail to see what point your attempting to make. If you are trying to make a case about priests and their bad habit of having unicorniphiliac relations with kids, then I guess I agree... But honestly I think you could have chosen a better way
.
#1499620 Do you believe in god?
Posted by
on 13 August 2011 - 04:08 PM
I readily agree with that second poster, you've certainly opened a can of worms by asking that. It's nice realizing that on internet, protected by a measure of anonymity, you can get away with asking these questions without significant repercussions.
But I digress, my answer is no; I do not believe in god, because it is an existence that can't be proven, however it also cannot be disproven, to argue this would be a fallacy. However I look at it another way. What if I were to say that I believe god is an intangible, invisible unicorn, omnipresent and omniscient . You also can't prove it nor disprove it. I feel that if I were to accept an idea that a god exists, I'd be putting my trust into something akin to a fictional character.
But I digress, my answer is no; I do not believe in god, because it is an existence that can't be proven, however it also cannot be disproven, to argue this would be a fallacy. However I look at it another way. What if I were to say that I believe god is an intangible, invisible unicorn, omnipresent and omniscient . You also can't prove it nor disprove it. I feel that if I were to accept an idea that a god exists, I'd be putting my trust into something akin to a fictional character.
