164 replies to this topic

[Warlord]

http://www.cracked.c...-medias-broken/


We could only be so lucky to have real zombies

[Yung]

Do you honestly live under a rock?

http://en.wikipedia....lism#Starvation

I'll let Wikipedia handle this for me.

Spoiler

There is a large step from moving forward in technology, to moving backwards in technology. 99% of the world does not know how to make a fire without a lighter. Does not know how to preserve food without a freezer. Does not know how to make shelter. Does not know which berries are poisonous and which are not. We are utterly reliant on technology for absolutely everything that we do. With over 97% of the human population eliminated, what are the chances that people that know how to do these things, and females capable of reproducing (Without ANY of the medical advanced we have in today's age). Is it possible? Perhaps. But its also very unlikely.

I wonder if the person who wrote that has a PHd?

[Sweeney]

I wonder if the person who wrote that has a PHd?

*PhD.

[luvsmyncis]

Ofc, I'll be bringing my Mr anyways~

Weird sex party hot air balloon. I find that more horrifying than the zombies!

[Nymh]

Weird sex party hot air balloon. I find that more horrifying than the zombies!

*dramatic gasp*

Well I never! You don't even know who my guest was going to be!

[Elindoril]

I wonder if the person who wrote that has a PHd?

You're never going to stop using that stale joke, are you?

[iargue]

I wonder if the person who wrote that has a PHd?

Yes. They do.

1: Wikipedia isn't 100% accurate. I thought everyone knew that.
2: Women were giving birth long before technology or medical advances. I'm sure there are also plenty of women who don't make it to a hospital and push their babies out on the side of the road.
Hell, there are women in 3rd world countries doing it in huts at this very moment.

1)Wikipedia is more accurate then any source you will find today, because wikpedia uses more than one source to collate their information, whereas everything else uses just a single source. I've never been presented with false information on wikipedia, whereas the textbooks issued by my college has been wrong multiple times. Even if you don't trust Wikipedia, just look at the sources.
2)Did I ever say "No one ever gave birth before technology!!!!" No, but a large portion of women died during childbirth in the days before we had technology to assist with it. They are definitely capable of giving birth, but without technology they have a largely increased chance to die during it, or have other serious complications.

[NapisaurusRex]

2)Did I ever say "No one ever gave birth before technology!!!!" No, but a large portion of women died during childbirth in the days before we had technology to assist with it. They are definitely capable of giving birth, but without technology they have a largely increased chance to die during it, or have other serious complications.

Without technology, or without increased knowledge? Do you think a woman giving birth in the US at home today would have a much, much higher chance of dying than someone in a hospital surrounded by technology?

[luvsmyncis]

*dramatic gasp*

Well I never! You don't even know who my guest was going to be!

I assumed it was the shirtless werewolf guy from True Blood. I have a gif, but I'm not at home. PM it to you later.

[Sweeney]

I assumed it was the shirtless werewolf guy from True Blood. I have a gif, but I'm not at home. PM it to you later.

It was definitely me.
*flex*

[Waser Lave]

It was definitely me.
*flex*

[Sweeney]

[Drakonid]

1) Wikipedia is the best non-specialized source of information.

2)

[Pooo]

I think there's been stuff like this for ever, and the 2012 hype is dramatizing things.