A hijacking certainly makes more sense than most of the random theories being put about.
Of course it doesn't mean that they didn't crash later on but it explains why they aren't in the areas where they would have been if it had just crashed/exploded where contact was lost.
"Evidence is consistent with someone acting deliberately from inside the plane," he said, officially confirming the plane's disappearance was not caused by an accident."
I mean, it definitely does make the most sense considering it wasn't found anywhere near where it was supposed to be. Like you said, could have crashed later, but someone definitely had to have veered it off course. I just feel like if it was an actual hijacking/hostage situation, someone would have made contact with officials already?


