You don't have to become depressed and sentimental over the whole event because you didn't go through it, but I don't think the fact that 9/11 did not affect you doesn't mean you show a complete disregard for it.
Also, 9/11 is the first time US soil was attacked for a long time. That resonates a lot more to people than Embassies getting sacked in foreign developing countries. That's why it is important.
Out of 9/11 sprung Afghanistan and Iraq wars, how the Bush administration acted and how the Obama administration is acting... so I think its importance extends beyond the twin towers in the grand scheme of things.
What's the difference between terrorism and popular extremism?
It's not very solid do debunk the importance of 9/11 based on a slight technicality of terms.
I think it's safe to say it's terrorism. =/
Thanks for a thought out reply.
First, I'm not showing complete disregard for the event. It happened, I acknowledge that. But you don't see the same sort of 'rememberance' in the UK over the
London bombings on 7/7. I was there, actually, in the city. I'm more affected by that, by being there, than by watching endless, mindless hours of repetitive news coverage of the planes hitting towers from halfway across the country.
As to your point about US soil not being violated for a long time... I have to disagree on two points. First, Embassies are sovereign territory of their parent nations. The French embassy
is France.
Second, we've been bombed by terrorists before in the United States, and people forget that it doesn't take a moslem to detonate a bomb. Timothy McVeigh blew up the
Federal Building in Oklahoma City in 1995 and it's a slow news day when, on April 19th, some ten o'clock news anchor will mention it between what the President and Paris Hilton did that day. So sure, it might affect us more because it was New York and it was a high profile target, but that doesn't make it unique, and that doesn't mean we should give it more weight than it deserves.
I'm not going to argue about the reasons for war. If you really want to, create another thread. Suffice it to say I'm not satisfied with the Bush administration's justifications for war, let alone their reasoning linking the events of 9/11 to a nation (when, after all, a nation didn't hit us - a terrorist organization did).
The bit about terrorism and extremism relates to the examples I gave. All of those examples are terrorism except for the revolution in Iran in 1979, which I call popular extremism because the people of Iran overthrew a modernizing monarch in favor of a strict, traditional and theological ruling class, the Ayatollahs. If you thought I was referring to 9/11 as popular extremism, I apologize.